1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Initial Safety and Feasibility of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation: A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Urolithiasis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          There is a need to reliably render urolithiasis patients completely stone free with minimal morbidity. We report on the initial safety and feasibility with steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation (SURE) in a prospective study using basket extraction as a comparison.

          Materials and Methods:

          A pilot randomized controlled study was conducted comparing SURE with basket extraction postlaser lithotripsy. SURE is performed using the CVAC™ Aspiration System, a steerable catheter (with introducer). The safety and feasibility of steering CVAC throughout the collecting system under fluoroscopy and aspirating stone fragments as it was designed to do were evaluated. Fluoroscopy time, change in hemoglobin, adverse events through 30 days, total and proportion of stone volume removed at 1 day, intraoperative stone removal rate, and stone-free rate (SFR) at 30 days through CT were compared.

          Results:

          Seventeen patients were treated ( n = 9 SURE, n = 8 Basket). Baseline demographics and stone parameters were not significantly different between groups. One adverse event occurred in each group (self-limiting ileus for SURE and urinary tract infection for Basket). No mucosal injury and no contrast extravasation were observed in either group. The CVAC catheter was steered throughout the collecting system and aspirated fragments. There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time, procedure time, change in hemoglobin, or stone removal rate between groups. SURE removed more and a greater proportion of stone volume at day 1 vs baskets (202 mm 3 vs 91 mm 3, p < 0.01 and 84% vs 56%, p = 0.022). SURE achieved 100% SFR at 30 days vs 75% for baskets, although this difference was not statistically significant ( p = 0.20).

          Conclusions:

          This initial study suggests SURE is safe, feasible, and may be more effective in stone removal postlaser lithotripsy compared to basketing. More development is needed, and larger clinical studies are underway.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients.

          To assess the current indications, perioperative morbidity, and stone-free outcomes for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) worldwide. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) collected prospective data for consecutive patients who were treated with PCNL at centers around the world for 1 year. PCNL was performed according to study protocol and local clinical practice guidelines. Stone load and location were recorded, and postoperative complications were graded according to the modified Clavien grading system. Between November 2007 and December 2009, 5803 patients were treated at 96 centers in Europe, Asia, North America, South America, and Australia. Staghorn calculus was present in 1466 (27.5%) patients, and 940, 956, and 2603 patients had stones in the upper, interpolar, and lower pole calices, respectively. The majority of procedures (85.5%) were uneventful. Major procedure-related complications included significant bleeding (7.8%), renal pelvis perforation (3.4%), and hydrothorax (1.8%). Blood transfusion was administered in 328 (5.7%) patients, and fever >38.5°C occurred in 10.5% of patients. The distribution of scores in modified Clavien grades was: No complication (79.5%), I (11.1%), II (5.3%), IIIa (2.3%), IIIb (1.3%), IVa (0.3%), IVb (0.2%), or V (0.03%). At follow-up. the 30-day stone-free rate was 75.7%, and 84.5% of patients did not need additional treatment. With a high success rate and a low major complication rate, PCNL is an effective and safe technique overall for minimally invasive removal of kidney stones.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients.

              To assess the current indications for ureteroscopy (URS) treatment, outcome in terms of stone-free rate, and intra- and postoperative complications using the modified Clavien grading system.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Endourol
                J Endourol
                end
                Journal of Endourology
                Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers (140 Huguenot Street, 3rd Floor New Rochelle, NY 10801 USA )
                0892-7790
                1557-900X
                September 2022
                24 August 2022
                24 August 2022
                : 36
                : 9
                : 1161-1167
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.
                [ 2 ]Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.
                [ 3 ]Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Newton Wellesley Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
                [ 4 ]Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
                [ 5 ]Division of Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery, Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.
                [ 6 ]Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
                Author notes
                [*]Address correspondence to: Roger L. Sur, MD, Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health, 200 W Arbor Drive #8897, San Diego, CA 92103, USA rlsur@ 123456ucsd.edu
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3176-8437
                Article
                10.1089/end.2021.0759
                10.1089/end.2021.0759
                9422793
                35331002
                f7dcda58-4c51-423f-b43f-d9120666ce33
                © Roger L. Sur, et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

                This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 4, References: 15, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Procedures

                urolithiasis,aspiration,evacuation,ureteroscopy,sure
                urolithiasis, aspiration, evacuation, ureteroscopy, sure

                Comments

                Comment on this article