13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Best surgical technique and outcomes for large macular holes: retrospective multicentre study in Japan

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Real-World Evidence - What Is It and What Can It Tell Us?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes.

            Large macular holes usually have an increased risk of surgical failure. Up to 44% of large macular holes remain open after 1 surgery. Another 19% to 39% of macular holes are flat-open after surgery. Flat-open macular holes are associated with limited visual acuity. This article presents a modification of the standard macular hole surgery to improve functional and anatomic outcomes in patients with large macular holes. A prospective, randomized clinical trial. Patients with macular holes larger than 400 μm were included. In group 1, 51 eyes of 40 patients underwent standard 3-port pars plana vitrectomy with air. In group 2, 50 eyes of 46 patients underwent a modification of the standard technique, called the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique. In the inverted ILM flap technique, instead of completely removing the ILM after trypan blue staining, a remnant attached to the margins of the macular hole was left in place. This ILM remnant was then inverted upside-down to cover the macular hole. Fluid-air exchange was then performed. Spectral optical coherence tomography and clinical examination were performed before surgery and postoperatively at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Visual acuity and postoperative macular hole closure. Preoperative mean visual acuity was 0.12 in group 1 and 0.078 in group 2. Macular hole closure was observed in 88% of patients in group 1 and in 98% of patients in group 2. A flat-hole roof with bare retinal pigment epithelium (flat-open) was observed in 19% of patients in group 1 and 2% of patients in group 2. Mean (or median) postoperative visual acuity 12 months after surgery was 0.17 (range, 0.1-0.6) in group 1 and 0.28 (range, 0.02-0.8) in group 2 (P = 0.001). The inverted ILM flap technique prevents the postoperative flat-open appearance of a macular hole and improves both the functional and anatomic outcomes of vitrectomy for macular holes with a diameter greater than 400 μm. Spectral optical coherence tomography after vitrectomy with the inverted ILM flap technique suggests improved foveal anatomy compared with the standard surgery. Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reappraisal of biomicroscopic classification of stages of development of a macular hole.

              J Gass (1995)
              To update the biomicroscopic classification and anatomic interpretations of the stages of development of age-related macular hole and provide explanations for the remarkable recovery of visual acuity that occurs in some patients after vitreous surgery. Recent biomicroscopic observations of various stages of macular holes are used to postulate new anatomic explanations for these stages. Biomicroscopic observations include the following: (1) the change from a yellow spot (stage 1-A) to a yellow ring (stage 1-B) during the early stages of foveal detachment is unique to patients at risk of macular hole; (2) the prehole opacity with a small stage 2 hole may be larger than the hole diameter; and (3) the opacity resembling an operculum that accompanies macular holes is indistinguishable from a pseudo-operculum found in otherwise normal fellow eyes. The change from a yellow spot (stage 1-A) to a yellow ring (stage 1-B) is caused primarily by centrifugal displacement of retinal receptors after a dehiscence at the umbo. The hole may be hidden by semiopaque contracted prefoveolar vitreous cortex bridging the yellow ring (stage 1-B occult hole). Stage 1-B occult holes become manifest (stage 2 holes) either after early separation of the contracted prefoveolar vitreous cortex from the retina surrounding a small hole or as an eccentric can-opener-like tear in the contracted prefoveolar vitreous cortex, at the edge of larger stage 2 holes. Most prehole opacities probably contain no retinal receptors (pseudo-opercula). Surgical reattachment of the retina surrounding the hole and centripetal movement of the foveolar retina induced by gliosis may restore foveal anatomy and function to near normal.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Acta Ophthalmologica
                Acta Ophthalmol
                Wiley
                1755375X
                December 2018
                December 2018
                April 19 2018
                : 96
                : 8
                : e904-e910
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Ophthalmology; Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences; Kagoshima Japan
                [2 ]Department of Ophthalmology; Sapporo City General Hospital; Sapporo Japan
                [3 ]Department of Ophthalmology; Institute of Health Biosciences; The University of Tokushima Graduate School; Tokushima Japan
                [4 ]Department of Ophthalmology; Faculty of Medicine; University of Tsukuba; Tsukuba Japan
                [5 ]Department of Ophthalmology; National Defense Medical College; Tokorozawa Japan
                [6 ]Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science; Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences; Nagoya Japan
                [7 ]Department of Ophthalmology; Faculty of Medical Sciences; University of Fukui; Fukui Japan
                [8 ]Department of Ophthalmology; Nara Medical University; Kashihara Japan
                [9 ]Department of Ophthalmology; Hyogo College of Medicine; Nishinomiya Japan
                Article
                10.1111/aos.13795
                29671948
                f7e65654-ff3a-4f89-922e-db6e29f60233
                © 2018

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#am

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article