1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The use of tobacco in online trailers of top-grossing movies

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          INTRODUCTION

          Images of tobacco use in movies have been studied extensively, showing that smoking in movies can cause the initiation of smoking among young people. Tobacco use in movie trailers, however, has not been monitored to the extent of full-length films. As such, the purpose of this study was to assess how many online trailers from top-grossing movies contain images of tobacco use, and to estimate audience exposure to those depictions.

          METHODS

          A total of 964 trailers from the top-grossing movies of 2010–16 were located on YouTube and analyzed for the number of tobacco ‘incidents’ (tobacco went off screen and on screen, a different actor had tobacco, or a new scene contained tobacco). Audience exposure was measured through ‘impressions’, by multiplying each trailer’s number of incidents by the number of times the trailer was viewed.

          RESULTS

          From 2010 to 2016, the trailers from top-grossing movies increased in: total per cent of tobacco incidents (16% in 2010 vs 21% in 2016), total number of incidents (69 in 2010 vs 102 in 2016), and tobacco impressions (89 million in 2010 vs 725 million in 2016).

          CONCLUSIONS

          A considerable number of online movie trailers contain incidents of tobacco use, with a noteworthy exposure to those incidents. As such, tobacco use in movie trailers should be monitored to the same extent as full-length movies, and public health professionals should advocate for age-verification restrictions to movie trailers that contain tobacco incidents and that anti-smoking advertisements be shown before trailers containing any incidents.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Is "YouTube" telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Smoking in top-grossing movies --- United States, 1991-2009.

            (2010)
            Exposure to onscreen smoking in movies increases the probability that youths will start smoking. Youths who are heavily exposed to onscreen smoking are approximately two to three times more likely to begin smoking than youths who are lightly exposed; a similar, but smaller effect exists for young adults. To monitor the extent to which tobacco use is shown in popular movies, Thumbs Up! Thumbs Down! (TUTD), a project of Breathe California of Sacramento-Emigrant Trails, counted the occurrences of tobacco use (termed "incidents") shown in U.S. top-grossing movies during 1991-2009. This report summarizes the results of that study, which found that the number of tobacco incidents depicted in the movies during this period peaked in 2005 and then progressively declined. Top-grossing movies released in 2009 contained 49% of the number of onscreen smoking incidents as observed in 2005 (1,935 incidents in 2009 versus 3,967 incidents in 2005). Further reduction of tobacco use depicted in popular movies could lead to less initiation of smoking among adolescents. Effective methods to reduce the potential harmful influence of onscreen tobacco use should be implemented.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Tobacco Use in Top-Grossing Movies — United States, 2010–2016

              The Surgeon General has concluded that there is a causal relationship between depictions of smoking in the movies and the initiation of smoking among young persons ( 1 ). The more youths see smoking on screen, the more likely they are to start smoking; youths who are heavily exposed to onscreen smoking imagery are approximately two to three times as likely to begin smoking as are youths who receive less exposure ( 1 , 2 ). A Healthy People 2020 objective is to reduce the proportion of youths exposed to onscreen tobacco marketing in movies and television (Tobacco Use Objective 18.3) ( 3 ). To assess the recent extent of tobacco use imagery in youth-rated movies (G, PG, PG-13*), 2010–2016 data from Thumbs Up! Thumbs Down! (TUTD), a project of Breathe California of Sacramento-Emigrant Trails were analyzed and compared with previous reports. † In 2016, 41% of movies that were among the 10 top-grossing movies in any calendar week included tobacco use, compared with 45% in 2010. Among youth-rated movies, 26% included tobacco use in 2016 (including 35% of PG-13 movies) compared with 31% in 2010 (including 43% of PG-13 movies). The steady decline in the number of tobacco incidents in youth-rated movies from 2005–2010 stopped after 2010. The total number of individual occurrences of tobacco use in a movie (tobacco incidents) in top-grossing movies increased 72%, from 1,824 in 2010 to 3,145 in 2016, with an increase of 43% (from 564 to 809) occurring among PG-13 rated movies. Reducing tobacco use in youth-related movies could help prevent the initiation of tobacco use among young persons. TUTD counts occurrences of tobacco incidents, defined as the use or implied use of a tobacco product (cigarettes, cigars, pipes, hookah, smokeless tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes) by an actor, in U.S. top-grossing movies each year. Trained monitors count all tobacco incidents in those movies that are among the 10 top-grossing movies in any calendar week of the year. Previous reports have used this criterion because U.S. movies ranked in the 10 top-grossing movies for at least 1 week have accounted for 96% of U.S. ticket sales ( 4 – 6 ). At least two monitors independently evaluate each film; any differences are resolved by a supervisor who independently watches the film using the same protocol. Incidents of implied use have been rare and occur when a person is handed or is holding, but does not necessarily use, a tobacco product. A new incident was counted each time 1) a tobacco product went off screen and then came back on screen; 2) a different actor was shown with a tobacco product; or 3) a scene changed and the new scene contained the use or implied use of a tobacco product. § To calculate the percentage of movies with tobacco incidents, the number of movies with tobacco incidents was divided by the total number of movies, and the average number of tobacco incidents per movie was calculated for each motion picture company. For each year during 2010–2016, the number of top-grossing movies with tobacco incidents and overall number of tobacco incidents were calculated. Results were also analyzed by Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) ratings (G, PG, PG-13, R). Findings were also compared with data from reports from 1991–2010 ( 4 , 5 ). In 2016, among 143 top-grossing movies, 59 (41%) had tobacco incidents, compared with 62 (45%) of 137 in 2010; among top-grossing R-rated movies, 35 (67%) of 52 had tobacco incidents in 2016, compared with 35 (71%) of 49 in 2010 (Table 1). Among youth-rated movies (G, PG, or PG-13), 24 (26%) of 91 had tobacco incidents in 2016, compared with 27 (31%) of 88 in 2010. Overall, from 2010 to 2016, the number of top-grossing movies with tobacco incidents ranged from 58 in 2014 to 76 in 2013 (Table 1). TABLE 1 Number and percentage of top-grossing movies with any tobacco incidents, by Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) rating and movie company — United States, 2010–2016 Movie company MPAA rating* No. (%) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Comcast (Universal) G/PG 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) PG-13 1 (17) 4 (40) 3 (50) 2 (29) 6 (67) 3 (30) 2 (18) 21 (36) R 6 (86) 6 (86) 8 (73) 10 (77) 5 (71) 5 (50) 2 (22) 42 (66) Disney G/PG 1 (11) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (2) PG-13 0 (0) 3 (60) 1 (33) 2 (40) 0 (0) 2 (50) 1 (20) 9 (32) R 0 (0) 1 (100) 0 (0) 1 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 2 (100) Fox G/PG 0 (0) 2 (29) 1 (17) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (7) PG-13 3 (38) 3 (50) 2 (40) 2 (33) 4 (57) 4 (36) 4 (67) 22 (45) R 5 (71) 2 (100) 3 (100) 6 (100) 5 (63) 5 (100) 4 (80) 30 (83) Independents† G/PG 3 (60) 0 (0) 1 (50) 2 (67) 1 (20) 2 (67) 1 (17) 10 (37) PG-13 6 (55) 6 (46) 12 (52) 10 (50) 9 (47) 10 (59) 6 (38) 59 (50) R 15 (83) 6 (67) 15 (68) 19 (83) 7 (58) 16 (70) 16 (70) 94 (72) Sony G/PG 0 (0) 1 (17) 1 (33) 1 (33) 2 (50) 1 (20) 0 (0) 6 (24) PG-13 8 (67) 7 (58) 6 (60) 4 (57) 5 (71) 3 (50) 3 (33) 36 (57) R 2 (67) 7 (78) 6 (75) 5 (83) 5 (83) 4 (100) 5 (100) 34 (83) Time Warner (Warner Bros.) G/PG 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (100) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (8) PG-13 2 (22) 4 (33) 4 (44) 3 (27) 2 (25) 4 (50) 2 (20) 21 (31) R 4 (50) 3 (50) 5 (83) 3 (50) 3 (33) 6 (60) 4 (67) 28 (55) Viacom (Paramount) G/PG 0 (0) 3 (60) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 3 (23) PG-13 3 (75) 3 (50) 2 (40) 1 (25) 2 (25) 2 (67) 5 (56) 18 (46) R 3 (50) 1 (33) 3 (75) 4 (100) 2 (67) 2 (67) 4 (100) 19 (70) Subtotal by ratings All G/PG 4 (11) 6 (14) 3 (11) 4 (21) 3 (12) 3 (13) 1 (4) 24 (13) All PG-13 23 (43) 30 (47) 30 (49) 24 (40) 28 (46) 28 (47) 23 (35) 186 (44) All youth-rated§ 27 (31) 36 (37) 33 (37) 28 (35) 31 (36) 31 (38) 24 (26) 210 (34) All R 35 (71) 26 (70) 40 (74) 48 (81) 27 (60) 38 (69) 35 (67) 249 (71) All ratings 62 (45) 62 (46) 73 (51) 76 (55) 58 (44) 69 (50) 59 (41) 459 (51) * G = General Audiences (all ages admitted); PG-13 = Parents Strongly Cautioned (some material might be inappropriate for preteenagers); R = Restricted (under age 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). † Independent movie companies include producer-distributors that are not members of MPAA, but regularly adhere to MPAA ratings and advertising rules. § Youth-rated includes G/PG and PG-13. Although the percentage of top-grossing movies with tobacco incidence decreased during 2010–2016, the total number of tobacco incidents in top-grossing movies increased by 72%, from 1,824 to 3,145 (Table 2). The total number of incidents in G or PG movies decreased by 87% (from 30 to 4), whereas the number in PG-13 movies increased 43% (from 564 to 809), and the number in R-rated movies increased 90% (from 1,230 to 2,332). Compared with previous studies ( 4 , 5 ), smoking incidents had peaked at 3,962 incidents in 2005; the year with the lowest number of recorded smoking incidents (1,613) was 1998 (Figure). During 2010–2016, the lowest number of tobacco incidents (1,743) occurred in 2015; the highest number since 2010 (3,145) occurred in 2016, representing an 80% increase compared with the previous year. TABLE 2 Number of tobacco incidents in top-grossing movies, by Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) rating and movie company — United States, 2010–2016 Movie company MPAA rating* 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Total Comcast (Universal) G/PG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PG-13 19 78 39 53 173 11 266 639 R 35 154 251 398 76 113 50 1,077 Disney G/PG 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 PG-13 0 148 102 57 0 123 6 436 R 0 20 0 4 0 0 0 24 Fox G/PG 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 5 PG-13 96 174 205 3 101 150 145 874 R 274 36 47 278 210 59 47 951 Independents† G/PG 20 0 19 2 15 5 4 65 PG-13 132 22 282 315 625 187 128 1,691 R 582 216 720 511 559 456 889 3,933 Sony G/PG 0 9 2 1 12 83 0 107 PG-13 198 166 178 26 184 15 144 911 R 33 537 246 155 225 156 576 1,928 Time Warner (Warner Bros.) G/PG 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 5 PG-13 4 106 265 309 16 30 40 770 R 80 62 267 233 343 322 541 1,848 Viacom (Paramount) G/PG 0 95 0 0 0 0 0 95 PG-13 115 50 92 12 66 3 80 418 R 226 4 166 217 34 30 229 906 Subtotals by ratings All G/PG 30 107 23 8 27 88 4 287 All PG-13 564 744 1,163 775 1,165 519 809 5,739 All youth-rated§ 594 851 1,186 783 1,192 607 813 6,026 All R 1,230 1,029 1,697 1,796 1,447 1,136 2,332 10,667 All ratings 1,824 1,880 2,883 2,579 2,639 1,743 3,145 16,693 * G = General Audiences (all ages admitted); PG-13 = Parents Strongly Cautioned (some material might be inappropriate for preteenagers); R = Restricted (under age 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). † Independent movie companies include producer-distributors that are not members of MPAA, but regularly adhere to MPAA ratings and advertising rules. § Youth-rated includes G/PG and PG-13. FIGURE Tobacco incidents in top-grossing movies, by movie rating* — United States, 1991–2016 *Ratings are assigned by the Motion Picture Association of America, the trade organization that represents the six major movies studios. G = General Audiences (all ages admitted); PG = Parental Guidance Suggested (some material might not be suitable for children); PG-13 = Parents Strongly Cautioned (some material might be inappropriate for children under 13); and R = Restricted (under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian). The figure above is a bar chart showing the number and percentages of tobacco incidents in top-grossing movies, by movie rating, in the United States during 1991–2016. Discussion The findings in this report indicate that although there were previously reported declines in the number of youth-rated movies with tobacco incidents observed during 2005–2010 ( 4 , 5 ), since 2010 there has been no progress in reducing the total number of tobacco incidents in youth-rated movies. Had the trend established from 2005 to 2010 continued, all youth-rated films would have been smoke-free by 2015. Although there were fewer top-grossing movies depicting tobacco use in 2016 compared with 2010, an increase in the number of such incidents occurred, thereby concentrating exposure to tobacco use in fewer films. The average number of tobacco incidents increased 55% in youth-rated movies with any tobacco depiction, from 22 incidents in 2010 to 34 incidents in 2016, and increased 91% in R-rated films with any tobacco depictions, from 35 incidents in 2010 to 67 incidents in 2016. Tobacco use depictions are now uncommon in G and PG films; however, the 43% increase in the total number of tobacco-use incidents in PG-13 movies, from 564 in 2010 to 809 in 2016, is of particular public health concern because of the established causal relationship between youths’ exposure to smoking in movies and smoking initiation ( 1 ). The six major motion picture companies have policies to reduce depictions of tobacco use in youth-rated films, ¶ which likely contributed to the reduction in the number of movies with tobacco incidents during 2005–2010. TUTD started systematic data collection of onscreen tobacco use in movies in 1991. Occurrences of tobacco use in movies varied from 1991 to 2010, reaching a peak in 2005 then declining by almost half by 2010 ( 4 , 5 ). Public health organizations, investors, state health departments, and state attorneys general raised concerns regarding tobacco incidents in movies beginning in 2001, which might account, in part, for the decrease in onscreen tobacco incidents after 2005 and before major motion picture companies adopted policies regarding tobacco imagery in youth-rated films ( 4 , 5 ). However, the lack of progress in recent years suggests that enhanced measures to address tobacco incidents in movies are warranted. One such intervention would be the assignment of an R rating to any movie with smoking or other tobacco-use imagery (unless the portrayal is of actual historical figures who smoked, a documentary, or if the portrayal includes the negative effects of tobacco use) ( 7 – 9 ). Other interventions include certifying that no payments have been received by the studio or producers for depicting tobacco use in the movies and ending the onscreen depiction of actual tobacco brands ( 7 , 8 ). These and additional interventions, if implemented, could help eliminate tobacco incidents in youth-rated movies ( 7 – 9 ). State and local health departments could also work with state agencies that manage movie subsidies to ensure that such subsidies do not go to films that include depictions of tobacco use. During 2010–2016, approximately 24 states awarded approximately $3.5 billion in public subsidies, such as tax credits, to productions of movies with tobacco incidents, including youth-rated movies.** Currently the MPAA does not assign R ratings to movies based on tobacco use incidents. In 2007, the MPAA developed a smoking “rating descriptor” that is applied to a few movies that contain smoking. These descriptors can appear in fine print in the box with the letter rating for a movie and can appear on advertisements and promotions to describe the type of content in a movie, such as language, violence, nudity, or sexual content. However, 89% of top-grossing, youth-rated movies with smoking did not carry the MPAA “smoking descriptor” in 2015 ( 9 ). A longitudinal cohort study of smoking onset among youths viewing movies released during 1998–2003 concluded that classifying movies with smoking with an R rating could reduce the number of teen smokers by approximately 18% ( 7 ). The Surgeon General notes that the magnitude of the effect of an R rating for smoking would be similar to increasing the price of cigarettes from $6.00 to $7.50 per pack ( 10 ). The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, detailed audience composition data are not publicly available; therefore, the number of tobacco use impressions (one person seeing one tobacco incident one time, a measure of total audience exposure) delivered by a particular movie to children and adolescents could not be determined. Second, the sample did not include all movies. However, the samples of top grossing movies were used because they are expected to account for approximately 95% of theater tobacco-use impressions ( 4 – 6 ). Finally, the measure used to assess tobacco exposure from movies should be interpreted cautiously because movies can be viewed through other channels (e.g., recorded media, such as DVDs and Blu-ray; television; and online streaming) that do not contribute to the calculation of in-theater impressions. As viewing platforms expand, it is important to identify whether youths are being exposed to tobacco imagery through other media sources, such as broadcast and cable television, on-demand services, and social media. Further research into youths’ exposure to tobacco imagery in these and other forms of media could also help identify the impact that exposure through these sources has on youths’ tobacco use. If current trends continue, 5.6 million youths who are alive today are projected to die from tobacco-related diseases ( 10 ). Whereas the number of top-grossing movies with tobacco use incidents continued to decline from 2010 to 2016, one in four youth-rated movies featured tobacco imagery, which is harmful to youths and causes youths to start using tobacco. The frequency and increase in tobacco incidents in PG-13 movies is of public health concern because these movies are rated as appropriate for youths. Opportunities exist for movie studios to reduce tobacco incidents that appear in youth-related movies, including rating films with smoking R, which would help prevent or delay the initiation of tobacco use among young persons and prevent premature deaths from tobacco-related diseases. Summary What is already known about this topic? The Surgeon General has concluded that there is a causal relationship between depictions of smoking in the movies and the initiation of smoking among young persons. The more frequently youths see smoking on screen, the more likely they are to start smoking; youths who are heavily exposed to onscreen smoking imagery are approximately two to three times more likely to begin smoking than are youths who are less exposed. What is added by this report? Previously reported declines in number of top-grossing movies with tobacco use has continued; however, the decline in the total number of tobacco incidents has not progressed since 2010. From 2010 to 2016, the total number of tobacco incidents in top-grossing movies increased, with a 43% increase occurring among movies rated PG-13. What are the implications for public health practice? Although there were fewer youth-rated films with tobacco incidents in 2016 than in 2010, total depictions of tobacco use has remained stable, concentrating such exposure in fewer films. Reducing tobacco incidents that appear in youth-related movies would prevent the initiation of tobacco use among young persons. An R rating for movies with tobacco use could potentially reduce the number of teen smokers by 18% and prevent their premature deaths from tobacco-related diseases.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Tob Prev Cessat
                Tob Prev Cessat
                TPC
                Tobacco Prevention & Cessation
                European Publishing on behalf of the European Network for Smoking and Tobacco Prevention (ENSP)
                2459-3087
                01 July 2019
                2019
                : 5
                : 23
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Health and Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, United States
                Author notes
                CORRESPONDENCE TO Christopher M. Seitz. Department of Health and Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Leon Levine Hall of Health Sciences, 1179 State Farm Road, Boone, North Carolina 28608, United States. E-mail: seitzcm@ 123456appstate.edu
                Article
                23
                10.18332/tpc/110008
                7205040
                f83ed5b7-94e3-4925-9178-1a08e50705d8
                © 2019 Seitz C.P

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 30 April 2019
                : 03 June 2019
                : 12 June 2019
                Categories
                Short Report

                tobacco,smoking,movies,policy,prevention
                tobacco, smoking, movies, policy, prevention

                Comments

                Comment on this article