7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Prevalence of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus among Livestock and Ticks in Zhambyl Region, Kazakhstan, 2017

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT.

          Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a highly fatal zoonotic disease endemic to Kazakhstan. Previous work estimated the seroprevalence of CCHF virus (CCHFV) among livestock owners in the Zhambyl region of southern Kazakhstan at 1.2%. To estimate CCHFV seroprevalence among cattle and sheep, we selected 15 villages with known history of CCHFV circulation (endemic) and 15 villages without known circulation (nonendemic) by cluster sampling with probability proportional to livestock population size. We collected whole blood samples from 521 sheep and 454 cattle from randomly selected households within each village and collected ticks found on the animals. We tested livestock blood for CCHFV-specific IgG antibodies by ELISA; ticks were screened for CCHFV RNA by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and CCHFV antigen by antigen-capture ELISA. We administered questionnaires covering animal demographics and livestock herd characteristics to an adult in each selected household. Overall weighted seroprevalence was 5.7% (95% CI: 3.1, 10.3) among sheep and 22.5% (95% CI: 15.8, 31.2) among cattle. CCHFV-positive tick pools were found on two sheep (2.4%, 95% CI: 0.6, 9.5) and three cattle (3.8%, 95% CI: 1.2, 11.5); three CCHFV-positive tick pools were found in nonendemic villages. Endemic villages reported higher seroprevalence among sheep (15.5% versus 2.8%, P < 0.001) but not cattle (25.9% versus 20.1%, P = 0.42). Findings suggest that the current village classification scheme may not reflect the geographic distribution of CCHFV in Zhambyl and underscore that public health measures must address the risk of CCHF even in areas without a known history of circulation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
          American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
          0002-9637
          1476-1645
          May 04 2022
          May 04 2022
          : 106
          : 5
          : 1478-1485
          Affiliations
          [1 ]1U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia;
          [2 ]2Epidemic Intelligence Service, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology and Laboratory Services, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia;
          [3 ]3U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – Central Asia Office, Almaty, Kazakhstan;
          [4 ]4Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia;
          [5 ]5Zhambyl Oblast Department of Health, MoH, Taraz, Kazakhstan;
          [6 ]6Zhambyl Oblast Department for Quality Control and Safety of Goods and Services, MoH, Taraz, Kazakhstan;
          [7 ]7Zhambyl Oblast Veterinary Inspection, MoA, Taraz, Kazakhstan;
          [8 ]8Zhambyl Oblast Veterinary Department of Oblast Administration, Taraz, Kazakhstan;
          [9 ]9Central Reference Laboratory, Branch of NRCV, MoES, Almaty, Kazakhstan
          Article
          10.4269/ajtmh.21-1092
          9128673
          35378505
          f8c44a2d-5fde-4222-b455-2e59c2580216
          © 2022
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article