13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Measures of Physical Performance and Muscle Strength as Predictors of Fracture Risk Independent of FRAX, Falls, and aBMD: A Meta‐Analysis of the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Measures of muscle mass, strength, and function predict risk of incident fractures, but it is not known whether this risk information is additive to that from FRAX (fracture risk assessment tool) probability. In the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study cohorts (Sweden, Hong Kong, United States), we investigated whether measures of physical performance/appendicular lean mass (ALM) by DXA predicted incident fractures in older men, independently of FRAX probability. Baseline information included falls history, clinical risk factors for falls and fractures, femoral neck aBMD, and calculated FRAX probabilities. An extension of Poisson regression was used to investigate the relationship between time for five chair stands, walking speed over a 6 m distance, grip strength, ALM adjusted for body size (ALM/height 2), FRAX probability (major osteoporotic fracture [MOF]) with or without femoral neck aBMD, available in a subset of n = 7531), and incident MOF (hip, clinical vertebral, wrist, or proximal humerus). Associations were adjusted for age and time since baseline, and are reported as hazard ratios (HRs) for first incident fracture per SD increment in predictor using meta‐analysis. 5660 men in the United States (mean age 73.5 years), 2764 men in Sweden (75.4 years), and 1987 men in Hong Kong (72.4 years) were studied. Mean follow‐up time was 8.7 to 10.9 years. Greater time for five chair stands was associated with greater risk of MOF (HR 1.26; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.34), whereas greater walking speed (HR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.90), grip strength (HR 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.82), and ALM/height 2 (HR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.90) were associated with lower risk of incident MOF. Associations remained largely similar after adjustment for FRAX, but associations between ALM/height 2 and MOF were weakened (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.99). Inclusion of femoral neck aBMD markedly attenuated the association between ALM/height 2 and MOF (HR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.10). Measures of physical performance predicted incident fractures independently of FRAX probability. Whilst the predictive value of ALM/height 2 was substantially reduced by inclusion of aBMD requires further study, these findings support the consideration of physical performance in fracture risk assessment. © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community

          Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE): development and evaluation.

            A Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) was evaluated in a sample of community-dwelling, older adults. Respondents were randomly assigned to complete the PASE by mail or telephone before or after a home visit assessment. Item weights for the PASE were derived by regressing a physical activity principal component score on responses to the PASE. The component score was based on 3-day motion sensor counts, a 3-day physical activity dairy and a global activity self-assessment. Test-retest reliability, assessed over a 3-7 week interval, was 0.75 (95% CI = 0.69-0.80). Reliability for mail administration (r = 0.84) was higher than for telephone administration (r = 0.68). Construct validity was established by correlating PASE scores with health status and physiologic measures. As hypothesized, PASE scores were positively associated with grip strength (r = 0.37), static balance (r = +0.33), leg strength (r = 0.25) and negatively correlated with resting heart rate (r = -0.13), age (r = -0.34) and perceived health status (r = -0.34); and overall Sickness Impact Profile score (r = -0.42). The PASE is a brief, easily scored, reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of physical activity in epidemiologic studies of older people.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study--a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men.

              Very little information is available to direct the prevention or management of osteoporosis in men. The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study is a prospective cohort study designed to examine the extent to which fracture risk is related to bone mass, bone geometry, lifestyle, anthropometric and neuromuscular measures, and fall propensity, as well as to determine how fractures affect quality of life in men. The study is also designed to understand how osteoporosis is related to prostate disease. At baseline, participants completed questionnaires regarding medical history, medications, physical activity, diet, alcohol intake, and cigarette smoking. Objective measures of anthropometric, neuromuscular, vision, strength, and cognitive variables were obtained. Skeletal assessments included DEXA, calcaneal ultrasound, and vertebral radiographs. Vertebral and proximal femoral QCT was performed on a subset (65%). Serum, urine, and DNA specimens were collected. After the baseline assessments, a questionnaire is mailed to participants every 4 months to ascertain incident falls, fractures, prostate cancer, and deaths. After an average of 4.5 years, participants are scheduled to return for a second comprehensive visit. Men were eligible if > or =65 years. 5995 men enrolled with a mean (+/-SD) age of 73.7 (+/-5.9) years, 11% of which were minorities. Most rated their health as good/excellent. Few were current smokers, although 59% had smoked previously, and 35% reported no alcohol intake, while 47% consumed at least 2 drinks per week. The mean (range) body mass index was 26.9 kg/m2 (17-56). A non-traumatic fracture after age 50 was reported by 17% of the cohort. The MrOS cohort should provide valuable information concerning the determinants of fracture in men and should help set the stage for the development of effective methods to identify those at risk.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nch@mrc.soton.ac.uk
                Journal
                J Bone Miner Res
                J. Bone Miner. Res
                10.1002/(ISSN)1523-4681
                JBMR
                Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0884-0431
                1523-4681
                29 August 2018
                December 2018
                : 33
                : 12 ( doiID: 10.1002/jbmr.v33.12 )
                : 2150-2157
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Medical Research Council (MRC) Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit University of Southampton Southampton UK
                [ 2 ] National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK
                [ 3 ] Centre for Bone and Arthritis Research (CBAR) Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
                [ 4 ] Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
                [ 5 ] Oregon Health & Science University Portland OR USA
                [ 6 ] Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Division of Biostatistics Oregon Health and Science University Portland OR USA
                [ 7 ] Department of Medicine & Therapeutics and School of Public Health The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong The People's Republic of China
                [ 8 ] Clinical and Molecular Osteoporosis Research Unit Lund University, Lund, Sweden; and Department of Orthopedics Skane University Hospital Malmö Sweden
                [ 9 ] Department of Surgical Sciences University of Uppsala Uppsala Sweden
                [ 10 ] National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre University of Oxford Oxford UK
                [ 11 ] Research Institute California Pacific Medical Center San Francisco CA USA
                [ 12 ] Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics University of California–San Francisco San Francisco CA USA
                [ 13 ] Institute for Health and Aging Catholic University of Australia Melbourne Australia
                [ 14 ] Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing (CIMA) Mellanby Centre for Bone Research University of Sheffield Sheffield UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Address correspondence to: Professor Nicholas Harvey, MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK. E‐mail: nch@ 123456mrc.soton.ac.uk

                Article
                JBMR3556
                10.1002/jbmr.3556
                6272117
                30011086
                f8c6a5bc-ab76-4bd6-a274-055509567761
                © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 20 March 2018
                : 23 June 2018
                : 07 July 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Pages: 8, Words: 5894
                Funding
                Funded by: MrOs United States
                Funded by: National Institutes of Health funding
                Funded by: The National Institute on Aging (NIA)
                Funded by: National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
                Funded by: The National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
                Funded by: NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
                Award ID: AG027810
                Award ID: AG042124
                Award ID: U01 AG042124
                Award ID: AG042139
                Award ID: AG042140 U01 AG042140
                Award ID: AG042143
                Award ID: AG042145
                Award ID: U01 AG042145
                Award ID: AG042168
                Award ID: AR066160
                Award ID: U01 AR066160
                Award ID: TR000128
                Award ID: UL1 TR000128
                Funded by: Swedish Research Council
                Funded by: UK Medical Research Council
                Award ID: 4050502589
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jbmr3556
                December 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.5.4 mode:remove_FC converted:16.01.2019

                Human biology
                osteoporosis,epidemiology,frax,falls,fracture,interaction
                Human biology
                osteoporosis, epidemiology, frax, falls, fracture, interaction

                Comments

                Comment on this article