20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hero or sidekick? Organellar reactive oxygen species during abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure

      news
      Plant Physiology
      Oxford University Press

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) is essential during plant responses to various abiotic stresses, including drought. ABA increases under drought stress, eventually leading to stomatal closure and simultaneously reducing photosynthesis (Kalladan et al. 2017). Guard cells closely regulate stomatal aperture to maintain efficient photosynthesis with minimal water loss (Jezek and Blatt 2017). The ABA signaling cascade possesses three constituents: ABA receptor, group-A protein phosphatase type 2C (PP2C), and sucrose non-fermenting 1 (SNF1)-related protein kinase 2 (SnRK2). In the presence of ABA, the ABA receptor perceives and inhibits PP2C, and phosphorylation of SnRK2 increases and activates the downstream processes (Weiner et al. 2010; Ruschhaupt et al. 2019). Respiratory burst oxidase homologs (RBOH) are the downstream targets of SnRK2 and are activated through phosphorylation. RBOH is a multigene family and a major source of reactive oxygen species (ROS). RBOH-mediated ROS production in the presence of ABA triggers signaling to close the stomata (Jezek and Blatt 2017; Watkins et al. 2017). While many aspects of ROS signaling are now well-established, still many questions remain to be explored. In a recent issue of Plant Physiology, Postiglione and Muday (2023) studied the intracellular origin sites of ABA-induced ROS during stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) with the help of robust ROS detection methodology. Using the generic ROS-responsive fluorescent probe CM 2,7-dihydro-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (CM H2DCF-DA), the authors observed that ABA enhances ROS production in distinct subcellular regions, including the mitochondria, chloroplasts, nucleus, and cytosol. The authors found no change in DCF fluorescence in the mitochondria, cytosol, and nucleus of an ABA receptor mutant, which suggested that ABA increases ROS levels in different subcellular compartments. To understand how ROS, particularly H2O2, increase in response to ABA, the authors used the H2O2-specific probe Peroxy Orange 1 (PO1). An increase in PO1 signal was observed only in chloroplasts but not in the mitochondria, nucleus, or cytosol at low concentrations of ABA. Under higher concentrations of ABA, they observed significant PO1 signals from the mitochondria and chloroplasts, demonstrating that chloroplasts and mitochondria are the sites of ABA-induced H2O2 production. There are certain limitations in using fluorescent dye and chemical probes to visualize changes in ROS, including irreversibility and differential dye uptake by some organelles (Martin et al. 2022). Therefore, the authors also used the genetically encoded ROS biosensor roGFP2-Orp1 that provides the oxidation ratio. ABA treatment resulted in increased oxidation ratios of whole stomata, nucleus, and cytosol in roGFP2-Orp1 lines. Further, the authors used the mitochondrial-specific biosensor (mt-roGFP2-Orp1) for visualizing H2O2 accumulation in guard cell mitochondria upon ABA treatment. The oxidation of mt-roGFP2-Orp1 increased in the presence of ABA but not uniformly or intensely like the cytosolic chemical ROS probe. The results obtained with biosensors and chemical sensors indicate similar phenomena of mitochondrial ROS accumulation upon ABA treatment during stomatal closure. To further address the role of ABA-induced ROS in the mitochondria of guard cells, the authors used the ABA overly sensitive 6 (abo6) mutant that shows an enhanced response to ABA. They pretreated abo6 mutants with a mitochondrial-specific ROS enhancer and observed rapid stomatal closure under ABA treatment. In contrast, pretreatment with mitochondrially targeted antioxidant suppressed stomatal closure and weakened the hypersensitive ABA-responsive nature of abo6. Further, they observed no fluorescence in rbohD rbohF double mutant mitochondria under ABA application. Collectively, these results demonstrate that mitochondrial ROS contribute to ABA-induced stomatal closure (Fig. 1). This detailed study on sources and factors contributing to organellar ROS production provides insight into whether organellar ROS are essential or a “byproduct” of general signaling events during stomatal closure. Figure 1. ABA increases organellar H2O2 during stomatal closure. A. Confocal micrographs of Arabidopsis guard cells stained with H2O2-specific chemical probe peroxy orange 1 (PO1) under different concentrations of ABA. Scale bar: 5 µm. The figures are adapted from Postiglione and Muday (2023). LUT, lookup tables; M, mitochondria; V, vacoule; N, nucleus; ABA, abscisic acid.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Membrane Transport System of the Guard Cell and Its Integration for Stomatal Dynamics

          Stomatal guard cells are widely recognized as the premier plant cell model for membrane transport, signaling, and homeostasis. This recognition is rooted in half a century of research into ion transport across the plasma and vacuolar membranes of guard cells that drive stomatal movements and the signaling mechanisms that regulate them. Stomatal guard cells surround pores in the epidermis of plant leaves, controlling the aperture of the pore to balance CO2 entry into the leaf for photosynthesis with water loss via transpiration. The position of guard cells in the epidermis is ideally suited for cellular and subcellular research, and their sensitivity to endogenous signals and environmental stimuli makes them a primary target for physiological studies. Stomata underpin the challenges of water availability and crop production that are expected to unfold over the next 20 to 30 years. A quantitative understanding of how ion transport is integrated and controlled is key to meeting these challenges and to engineering guard cells for improved water use efficiency and agricultural yields.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Structural and functional insights into core ABA signaling.

            A series of papers in the last year reported major advances in our understanding of abscisic acid (ABA) signaling: the identification of soluble ABA receptors, the elucidation of a core ABA signaling pathway and structural insights into the mechanism of ABA perception and signaling. Here we summarize these advances, which have shown in atomic resolution that the ABA receptors PYR1, PYL1 and PYL2 function as allosteric switches that inhibit type 2C protein phosphatases (PP2Cs) in response to ABA. These receptors function at the apex of a core signaling pathway that regulates ABA responses by controlling SnRK2 kinase activity and the phosphorylation of downstream target proteins such as ABFs, which control nuclear responses, and the ion channel SLAC1, which mediates electrophysiological responses to ABA. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Abscisic Acid-Induced Reactive Oxygen Species Are Modulated by Flavonols to Control Stomata Aperture.

              Abscisic acid (ABA) increases reactive oxygen species (ROS) in guard cells to close Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) stomata. In tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), we find that ABA-increased ROS is followed by stomatal closure and that both responses are blocked by inhibitors of ROS-producing respiratory burst oxidase enzymes. ABA-induced ROS sensor fluorescence accumulates in the nucleus, chloroplasts, and endomembranes. The accumulation of flavonol antioxidants in guard cells, but not surrounding pavement cells, was visualized by confocal microscopy using a flavonol-specific fluorescent dye. Decreased flavonols in guard cells in the anthocyanin reduced (are) mutant and elevated levels in the anthocyanin without (aw) mutant were quantified by confocal microscopy and in leaf extracts by mass spectrometry. Consistent with flavonols acting as antioxidants, higher levels of ROS were detected in guard cells of the tomato are mutant and lower levels were detected in aw both at homeostasis and after treatment with ABA. These results demonstrate the inverse relationship between flavonols and ROS. Guard cells of are show greater ABA-induced closure than the wild type, reduced light-dependent guard cell opening, and reduced water loss, with aw having opposite responses. Ethylene treatment of wild-type tomato plants increased flavonol accumulation in guard cells; however, no flavonol increases were observed in Neverripe (Nr), an ethylene receptor mutant. Consistent with lower levels of ROS due to elevated flavonols, ethylene treatments decreased ABA-induced stomatal closure in the wild type, but not Nr, with ethylene responses attenuated in the are mutant. Together, these results are consistent with flavonols dampening the ABA-dependent ROS burst that drives stomatal closure and facilitating stomatal opening to modulate leaf gas exchange.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Plant Physiol
                Plant Physiol
                plphys
                Plant Physiology
                Oxford University Press (US )
                0032-0889
                1532-2548
                May 2023
                10 February 2023
                10 February 2023
                : 192
                : 1
                : 10-11
                Affiliations
                Assistant Features Editor, Plant Physiology, American Society of Plant Biologists , USA
                Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin , Madison 53706, USA
                Author notes
                Author for correspondence: dmishra5@ 123456wisc.edu

                Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1562-1718
                Article
                kiad080
                10.1093/plphys/kiad080
                10152660
                36760136
                f8eb2115-2d46-4a76-8af0-a61a79e60460
                © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Society of Plant Biologists.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 January 2023
                : 25 January 2023
                : 24 February 2023
                Page count
                Pages: 2
                Categories
                News and Views
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01270
                AcademicSubjects/SCI01280
                AcademicSubjects/SCI02286
                AcademicSubjects/SCI02287
                AcademicSubjects/SCI02288

                Plant science & Botany
                Plant science & Botany

                Comments

                Comment on this article