193
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical efficacy of a RAF inhibitor needs broad target blockade in BRAF-mutant melanoma

      research-article
      * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * , * , @ , $ , $ , $ , # , $ , $ , * , $ , $ , % , ^ , & , + , % , α , # , , # , *
      Nature
      BRAF, melanoma, PLX4032, biomarker, oncogene, targeted therapy

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          B-RAF is the most frequently mutated protein kinase in human cancers. 1 The finding that oncogenic mutations in BRAF are common in melanoma 2 followed by the demonstration that these tumors are dependent on the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway 3 offered hope that inhibition of B-RAF kinase activity could benefit melanoma patients. Herein, we describe the structure-guided discovery of PLX4032 (RG7204), a potent inhibitor of oncogenic B-RAF kinase activity. Preclinical experiments demonstrated that PLX4032 selectively blocked the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway in BRAF mutant cells and caused regression of BRAF mutant xenografts. 4 Toxicology studies confirmed a wide safety margin consistent with the high degree of selectivity, enabling Phase 1 clinical trials using a crystalline formulation of PLX4032. 5 In a subset of melanoma patients, pathway inhibition was monitored in paired biopsy specimens collected before treatment initiation and following two weeks of treatment. This analysis revealed substantial inhibition of ERK phosphorylation, yet clinical evaluation did not show tumor regressions. At higher drug exposures afforded by a new amorphous drug formulation, 4, 5 greater than 80% inhibition of ERK phosphorylation in the tumors of patients correlated with clinical response. Indeed, the Phase 1 clinical data revealed a remarkably high 81% response rate in metastatic melanoma patients treated at an oral dose of 960 mg twice daily. 5 These data demonstrate that BRAF-mutant melanomas are highly dependent on B-RAF kinase activity.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes.

          Cancers arise owing to mutations in a subset of genes that confer growth advantage. The availability of the human genome sequence led us to propose that systematic resequencing of cancer genomes for mutations would lead to the discovery of many additional cancer genes. Here we report more than 1,000 somatic mutations found in 274 megabases (Mb) of DNA corresponding to the coding exons of 518 protein kinase genes in 210 diverse human cancers. There was substantial variation in the number and pattern of mutations in individual cancers reflecting different exposures, DNA repair defects and cellular origins. Most somatic mutations are likely to be 'passengers' that do not contribute to oncogenesis. However, there was evidence for 'driver' mutations contributing to the development of the cancers studied in approximately 120 genes. Systematic sequencing of cancer genomes therefore reveals the evolutionary diversity of cancers and implicates a larger repertoire of cancer genes than previously anticipated.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Coordinating ERK/MAPK signalling through scaffolds and inhibitors.

            The pathway from Ras through Raf and MEK (MAPK and ERK kinase) to ERK/MAPK (extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase) regulates many fundamental cellular processes. Recently, a number of scaffolding proteins and endogenous inhibitors have been identified, and their important roles in regulating signalling through this pathway are now emerging. Some scaffolds augment the signal flux, but also mediate crosstalk with other pathways; certain adaptors target MEK-ERK/MAPK complexes to subcellular localizations; others provide regulated inhibition. Computational modelling indicates that, together, these modulators can determine the dynamic biological behaviour of the pathway.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis of phase II cooperative group trials in metastatic stage IV melanoma to determine progression-free and overall survival benchmarks for future phase II trials.

              Objective tumor response rates observed in phase II trials for metastatic melanoma have historically not provided a reliable indicator of meaningful survival benefits. To facilitate using overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) as an endpoint for future phase II trials, we evaluated historical data from cooperative group phase II trials to attempt to develop benchmarks for OS and PFS as reference points for future phase II trials. Individual-level and trial-level data were obtained for patients enrolled onto 42 phase II trials (70 trial arms) that completed accrual in the years 1975 through 2005 and conducted by Southwest Oncology Group, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, North Central Cancer Treatment Group, and the Clinical Trials Group of the National Cancer Institute of Canada. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic variables, and between-trial(-arm) variability in 1-year OS rates and 6-month PFS rates were examined. Statistically significant individual-level and trial-level prognostic factors found in a multivariate survival analysis for OS were performance status, presence of visceral disease, sex, and whether the trial excluded patients with brain metastases. Performance status, sex, and age were statistically significant prognostic factors for PFS. Controlling for these prognostic variables essentially eliminated between-trial variability in 1-year OS rates but not in 6-month PFS rates. Benchmarks are provided for 1-year OS or OS curves that make use of the distribution of prognostic factors of the patients in the phase II trial. A similar benchmark for 6-month PFS is provided, but its use is more problematic because of residual between-trial variation in this endpoint.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                13 September 2010
                30 September 2010
                30 March 2011
                : 467
                : 7315
                : 596-599
                Affiliations
                [* ]Plexxikon Inc.
                [@ ]Yale University
                [$ ]Roche Pharmaceuticals
                [# ]Department of Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania
                []Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania
                [% ]Vanderbilt University
                [^ ]The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
                [& ]University of California, Los Angeles
                [+ ]Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
                [α ]Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
                Author notes
                Reprint requests to: Gideon Bollag, PhD Plexxikon Inc. 91 Bolivar Dr. Berkeley, CA 94710 gbollag@ 123456plexxikon.com
                Article
                nihpa233087
                10.1038/nature09454
                2948082
                20823850
                f91f8051-837e-405f-9201-3be8960c1c40

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute : NCI
                Award ID: R01 CA118871-01A1 ||CA
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute : NCI
                Award ID: P50 CA093372-01 ||CA
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                plx4032,biomarker,targeted therapy,oncogene,melanoma,braf
                Uncategorized
                plx4032, biomarker, targeted therapy, oncogene, melanoma, braf

                Comments

                Comment on this article