10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessment of Leisure Time Physical Activity and Brain Health in a Multiethnic Cohort of Older Adults

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is physical activity associated with brain volume and white matter hyperintensity burden?

          Findings

          In this cross-sectional study of 1443 older (≥65 years) individuals without dementia, more physical activity was associated with larger brain volumes.

          Meaning

          The findings of this study suggest that there may be a potential beneficial role of physical activity on brain health.

          Abstract

          This cross-sectional study examines the association between leisure time physical activity and measures of brain health assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in older adults.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Results from longitudinal studies suggest that regular leisure time physical activity (LTPA) is associated with reduced risk of dementia or Alzheimer disease. Data on the association between LTPA and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures remain scarce and inconsistent.

          Objective

          To examine the association of LTPA and MRI-assessed brain aging measures in a multiethnic elderly population.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This cross-sectional study included 1443 older (≥65 years) adults without dementia who were participants of the Washington/Hamilton Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project study. LTPA, from self-reported questionnaire, was calculated as metabolic equivalent of energy expenditure. Both moderate to vigorous LTPA, assessed as meeting Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (≥150 minutes/week) or not, and light-intensity LTPA were also examined.

          Exposures

          LTPA.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Primary outcomes included total brain volume (TBV), cortical thickness, and white matter hyperintensity volume, all derived from MRI scans with established methods and adjusted for intracranial volume when necessary. We examined the association of LTPA with these imaging markers using regression models adjusted for demographic, clinical, and vascular risk factors.

          Results

          The 1443 participants of the study had a mean (SD) age of 77.2 (6.4) years; 921 (63.8%) were women; 27.0%, 34.4%, and 36.3% were non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic African American, and Hispanic individuals, respectively; and 27.3% carried the apolipoprotein E ( APOE) ɛ4 allele. Compared with the LTPA of nonactive older adults, those with the most LTPA had larger (in cm 3) TBV (β [SE], 13.17 [4.42] cm 3; P = .003; P for trend = .006) and greater cortical thickness (β [SE], 0.016 [0.008] mm; P = .05; P for trend = .03). The effect size comparing the highest LTPA level with the nonactive group was equivalent to approximately 3 to 4 years of aging (β for 1 year older, −3.06 and −0.005 for TBV and cortical thickness, respectively). A dose-response association was found and even the lowest LTPA level had benefits (eg, TBV: β [SE], 9.03 [4.26] cm 3; P = .03) compared with the nonactive group. Meeting Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (TBV: β [SE], 18.82 [5.14] cm 3; P < .001) and light-intensity LTPA (TBV: β [SE], 9.26 [4.29] cm 3; P = .03) were also associated with larger brain measures. The association between LTPA and TBV was moderated by race/ethnicity, sex, and APOE status, but generally existed in all subgroups. The results remained similar after excluding participants with mild cognitive impairment.

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this study, more physical activity was associated with larger brain volume in older adults. Longitudinal studies are warranted to explore the potential role of physical activity in brain health among older individuals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references49

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group* under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease

          Neurology, 34(7), 939-939
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans

            Approximately 80% of US adults and adolescents are insufficiently active. Physical activity fosters normal growth and development and can make people feel, function, and sleep better and reduce risk of many chronic diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity.

              The concept of cognitive impairment intervening between normal ageing and very early dementia has been in the literature for many years. Recently, the construct of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has been proposed to designate an early, but abnormal, state of cognitive impairment. MCI has generated a great deal of research from both clinical and research perspectives. Numerous epidemiological studies have documented the accelerated rate of progression to dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD) in MCI subjects and certain predictor variables appear valid. However, there has been controversy regarding the precise definition of the concept and its implementation in various clinical settings. Clinical subtypes of MCI have been proposed to broaden the concept and include prodromal forms of a variety of dementias. It is suggested that the diagnosis of MCI can be made in a fashion similar to the clinical diagnoses of dementia and AD. An algorithm is presented to assist the clinician in identifying subjects and subclassifying them into the various types of MCI. By refining the criteria for MCI, clinical trials can be designed with appropriate inclusion and exclusion restrictions to allow for the investigation of therapeutics tailored for specific targets and populations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                19 November 2020
                November 2020
                19 November 2020
                : 3
                : 11
                : e2026506
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Taub Institute for Research in Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York, New York
                [2 ]Department of Neurology, Columbia University, New York, New York
                [3 ]Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New York, New York
                [4 ]Joseph P. Mailman School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, New York, New York
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: September 22, 2020.
                Published: November 19, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26506
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2020 Gu Y et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Yian Gu, PhD, Columbia University, 630 W 168th St, Box 16, New York, NY 10032 ( yg2121@ 123456cumc.columbia.edu ).
                Author Contributions : Dr Gu had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Gu, Brickman.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Gu, Beato.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Amarante, Chesebro, Manly, Schupf, Mayeux, Brickman.
                Statistical analysis: Gu, Schupf.
                Obtained funding: Gu, Manly, Schupf, Mayeux.
                Administrative, technical, or material support: Beato, Amarante, Chesebro, Manly, Mayeux, Brickman.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Brickman reported receiving personal fees from Cognition Therapeutics, Inc, personal fees from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, and shares from Mars Holding Ltd and Venus Medtech outside the submitted work; in addition, Dr Brickman had US patent No. 9867566 issued related to technologies for white matter hyperintensity quantification and a patent pending for methods and systems for evaluating age-related memory loss. No other disclosures were reported.
                Funding/Support: Data collection and sharing for this project was supported by the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP) grants PO1AG007232, R01AG037212, RF1AG054023, AG054520, AG061008, R01AG059013, and R56AG060156, funded by the National Institute on Aging, and by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through grant No. UL1TR001873.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funders had no role in design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Additional Contributions: This manuscript has been reviewed by WHICAP investigators for scientific content and consistency of data interpretation with previous WHICAP study publications. We acknowledge the WHICAP study participants and the WHICAP research and support staff for their contributions to this study.
                Article
                zoi200861
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26506
                7677758
                33211111
                f937c3a0-0425-42ae-9505-1dd0c25a5ff1
                Copyright 2020 Gu Y et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 18 July 2020
                : 22 September 2020
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Geriatrics

                Comments

                Comment on this article