36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares

      Why publish your research Open Access with G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics?

      Learn more and submit today!

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Improving Genomic Prediction in Cassava Field Experiments by Accounting for Interplot Competition

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Plants competing for available resources is an unavoidable phenomenon in a field. We conducted studies in cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz) in order to understand the pattern of this competition. Taking into account the competitive ability of genotypes while selecting parents for breeding advancement or commercialization can be very useful. We assumed that competition could occur at two levels: (i) the genotypic level, which we call interclonal, and (ii) the plot level irrespective of the type of genotype, which we call interplot competition or competition error. Modification in incidence matrices was applied in order to relate neighboring genotype/plot to the performance of a target genotype/plot with respect to its competitive ability. This was added into a genomic selection (GS) model to simultaneously predict the direct and competitive ability of a genotype. Predictability of the models was tested through a 10-fold cross-validation method repeated five times. The best model was chosen as the one with the lowest prediction root mean squared error (pRMSE) compared to that of the base model having no competitive component. Results from our real data studies indicated that <10% increase in accuracy was achieved with GS-interclonal competition model, but this value reached up to 25% with a GS-competition error model. We also found that the competitive influence of a cassava clone is not just limited to the adjacent neighbors but spreads beyond them. Through simulations, we found that a 26% increase of accuracy in estimating trait genotypic effect can be achieved even in the presence of high competitive variance.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          On the design of early generation variety trials with correlated data

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Accounting for Natural and Extraneous Variation in the Analysis of Field Experiments

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Incorporation of competitive effects in forest tree or animal breeding programs.

              Competition among domesticated plants or animals can have a dramatic negative impact on yield of a stand or farm. The usual quantitative genetic model ignores these competitive interactions and could result in seriously incorrect breeding decisions and acerbate animal well-being. A general solution to this problem is given, for either forest tree breeding or penned animals, with mixed-model methodology (BLUP) utilized to separate effects on the phenotype due to the individuals' own genes (direct effects) and those from competing individuals (associative effects) and thereby to allow an optimum index selection on those effects. Biological verification was based on two lines of Japanese quail selected for 6-week weight; one line was selected only for direct effects (D-BLUP) while the other was selected on an optimal index for both direct and associative effects (C-BLUP). Results over 23 cycles of selection showed that C-BLUP produced a significant positive response to selection (b=0.52+/-0.25 g/hatch) whereas D-BLUP resulted in a nonsignificant negative response (b=-0.10+/-0.25 g/hatch). The regression of percentage of mortality on hatch number was significantly different between methods, decreasing with C-BLUP (b=-0.06+/-0.15 deaths/hatch) and increasing with D-BLUP (b=0.32+/-0.15 deaths/hatch). These results demonstrate that the traditional D-BLUP approach without associative effects not only is detrimental to response to selection but also compromises the well-being of animals. The differences in response show that competitive effects can be included in breeding programs, without measuring new traits, so that costs of the breeding program need not increase.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                G3 (Bethesda)
                Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
                G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
                Genetics Society of America
                2160-1836
                22 January 2018
                March 2018
                : 8
                : 3
                : 933-944
                Affiliations
                [* ]Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853
                []International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan 200001, Nigeria and
                []United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Station (USDA-ARS), Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, New York 14853-2901
                Author notes
                [1 ]Corresponding authors: Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. E-mail: anianna01@ 123456gmail.com ; and jeanluc.work@ 123456gmail.com
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3360-6979
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9966-2941
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7574-2645
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4849-628X
                Article
                GGG_300354
                10.1534/g3.117.300354
                5844313
                29358232
                f93c6d37-0a58-4e02-8fef-da679d78a2c2
                Copyright © 2018 Elias et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 October 2017
                : 09 January 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Equations: 23, References: 32, Pages: 12
                Categories
                Genomic Selection

                Genetics
                cassava,genomic selection,interplot competition,predictability,genpred,shared data resources
                Genetics
                cassava, genomic selection, interplot competition, predictability, genpred, shared data resources

                Comments

                Comment on this article