26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the mental health symptoms during the Covid‐19 pandemic in Southeast Asia

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Aims

          The Covid‐19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on the mental health of the general public and high‐risk groups worldwide. Due to its proximity and close links to China, Southeast Asia was one of the first regions to be affected by the outbreak. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the prevalence of anxiety, depression and insomnia in the general adult population and healthcare workers (HCWs) in Southeast Asia during the course of the first year of the pandemic.

          Methods

          Several literature databases were systemically searched for articles published up to February 2021 and two reviewers independently evaluated all relevant studies using pre‐determined criteria. The prevalence rates of mental health symptoms were calculated using a random‐effect meta‐analysis model.

          Results

          In total, 32 samples from 25 studies with 20 352 participants were included. Anxiety was assessed in all 25 studies and depression in 15 studies with pooled prevalence rates of 22% and 16%, respectively. Only two studies assessed insomnia, which was estimated at 19%. The prevalence of anxiety and depression was similar among frontline HCWs (18%), general HCWs (17%), and students (20%) while being noticeably higher in the general population (27%).

          Conclusions

          This is the first systematic review to investigate the mental health impact of the Covid‐19 pandemic in Southeast Asia. A considerable proportion of the general population and HCWs reported mild to moderate symptoms of anxiety and depression; the pooled prevalence rater, however, remain significantly lower than those reported in other areas such as China and Europe.

          Related collections

          Most cited references74

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis

            Highlights • At least one in five healthcare professionals report symptoms of depression and anxiety. • Almost four in 10 healthcare workers experience sleeping difficulties and/or insomnia. • Rates of anxiety and depression were higher for female healthcare workers and nursing staff. • Milder mood symptoms are common and screening should aim to identify mild and sub-threshold syndromes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Prevalence of stress, anxiety, depression among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis

              Background The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on public mental health. Therefore, monitoring and oversight of the population mental health during crises such as a panedmic is an immediate priority. The aim of this study is to analyze the existing research works and findings in relation to the prevalence of stress, anxiety and depression in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method In this systematic review and meta-analysis, articles that have focused on stress and anxiety prevalence among the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic were searched in the Science Direct, Embase, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science (ISI) and Google Scholar databases, without a lower time limit and until May 2020. In order to perform a meta-analysis of the collected studies, the random effects model was used, and the heterogeneity of studies was investigated using the I2 index. Moreover. data analysis was conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. Results The prevalence of stress in 5 studies with a total sample size of 9074 is obtained as 29.6% (95% confidence limit: 24.3–35.4), the prevalence of anxiety in 17 studies with a sample size of 63,439 as 31.9% (95% confidence interval: 27.5–36.7), and the prevalence of depression in 14 studies with a sample size of 44,531 people as 33.7% (95% confidence interval: 27.5–40.6). Conclusion COVID-19 not only causes physical health concerns but also results in a number of psychological disorders. The spread of the new coronavirus can impact the mental health of people in different communities. Thus, it is essential to preserve the mental health of individuals and to develop psychological interventions that can improve the mental health of vulnerable groups during the COVID-19 pandemic.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                sofia.pappa@westlondon.nhs.uk
                jiyao.chen@oregonstate.edu
                joshua.barnett2@nhs.net
                anabelc@uoregon.edu
                rebecca.dong@unisa.edu.au
                wen.xu@nottingham.edu.cn
                allen-yin@hotmail.com
                chenzbryan@gmail.com
                delios9580@gmail.com
                richardziychen@gmail.com
                millesay@oregonstate.edu
                wanxue@tongji.edu.cn
                stephen.x.zhang@gmail.com
                Journal
                Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
                Psychiatry Clin Neurosci
                10.1111/(ISSN)1440-1819
                PCN
                Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
                John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd (Melbourne )
                1323-1316
                1440-1819
                26 November 2021
                26 November 2021
                : 10.1111/pcn.13306
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Division of Brain Sciences Imperial College London London UK
                [ 2 ] West London NHS Trust London UK
                [ 3 ] College of Business Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry University of Oregon Eugene Oregon USA
                [ 5 ] Business School University of South Australia Adelaide Australia
                [ 6 ] Nottingham University Business School China University of Nottingham Ningbo China Ningbo China
                [ 7 ] School of Humanities Southeast University Nanjing China
                [ 8 ] Crescent Valley High School Corvallis Oregon USA
                [ 9 ] University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia
                [ 10 ] School of Economics and Management Tongji University Shanghai China
                [ 11 ] Faculty of Professions University of Adelaide Adelaide Australia
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence: Email: stephen.x.zhang@ 123456gmail.com

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2192-9778
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8182-0745
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6123-1193
                Article
                PCN13306
                10.1111/pcn.13306
                8661667
                34704305
                fa3c272d-e116-4d3b-8f9c-ee95d98b4123
                © 2021 The Authors Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences © 2021 Japanese Society of Psychiatry and Neurology

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 19 September 2021
                : 08 June 2021
                : 06 October 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Pages: 10, Words: 8281
                Categories
                Review Article
                Review Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.0.9 mode:remove_FC converted:10.12.2021

                anxiety,covid‐19,depression,mental health,meta‐analysis
                anxiety, covid‐19, depression, mental health, meta‐analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article