1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      REST: a preoperative tailored sleep intervention for patients undergoing total knee replacement – feasibility study for a randomised controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          To test the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a novel preoperative tailored sleep intervention for patients undergoing total knee replacement.

          Design

          Feasibility two-arm two-centre RCT using 1:1 randomisation with an embedded qualitative study.

          Setting

          Two National Health Service (NHS) secondary care hospitals in England and Wales.

          Participants

          Preoperative adult patients identified from total knee replacement waiting lists with disturbed sleep, defined as a score of 0–28 on the Sleep Condition Indicator questionnaire.

          Intervention

          The REST intervention is a preoperative tailored sleep assessment and behavioural intervention package delivered by an Extended Scope Practitioner (ESP), with a follow-up phone call 4 weeks postintervention. All participants received usual care as provided by the participating NHS hospitals.

          Outcome measures

          The primary aim was to assess the feasibility of conducting a full trial. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at baseline, 1-week presurgery, and 3 months postsurgery. Data collected to determine feasibility included the number of eligible patients, recruitment rates and intervention adherence. Qualitative work explored the acceptability of the study processes and intervention delivery through interviews with ESPs and patients.

          Results

          Screening packs were posted to 378 patients and 57 patients were randomised. Of those randomised, 20 had surgery within the study timelines. An appointment was attended by 25/28 (89%) of participants randomised to the intervention. Follow-up outcomes measures were completed by 40/57 (70%) of participants presurgery and 15/57 (26%) postsurgery. Where outcome measures were completed, data completion rates were 80% or higher for outcomes at all time points, apart from the painDETECT: 86% complete at baseline, 72% at presurgery and 67% postsurgery. Interviews indicated that most participants found the study processes and intervention acceptable.

          Conclusions

          This feasibility study has demonstrated that with some amendments to processes and design, an RCT to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the REST intervention is feasible.

          Trial registration number

          ISRCTN14233189.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research

          Despite the prevalence of sleep complaints among psychiatric patients, few questionnaires have been specifically designed to measure sleep quality in clinical populations. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances over a 1-month time interval. Nineteen individual items generate seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. The sum of scores for these seven components yields one global score. Clinical and clinimetric properties of the PSQI were assessed over an 18-month period with "good" sleepers (healthy subjects, n = 52) and "poor" sleepers (depressed patients, n = 54; sleep-disorder patients, n = 62). Acceptable measures of internal homogeneity, consistency (test-retest reliability), and validity were obtained. A global PSQI score greater than 5 yielded a diagnostic sensitivity of 89.6% and specificity of 86.5% (kappa = 0.75, p less than 0.001) in distinguishing good and poor sleepers. The clinimetric and clinical properties of the PSQI suggest its utility both in psychiatric clinical practice and research activities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The hospital anxiety and depression scale.

            A self-assessment scale has been developed and found to be a reliable instrument for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of an hospital medical outpatient clinic. The anxiety and depressive subscales are also valid measures of severity of the emotional disorder. It is suggested that the introduction of the scales into general hospital practice would facilitate the large task of detection and management of emotional disorder in patients under investigation and treatment in medical and surgical departments.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

              Purpose This article introduces the new 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) health status measure. Methods EQ-5D currently measures health using three levels of severity in five dimensions. A EuroQol Group task force was established to find ways of improving the instrument’s sensitivity and reducing ceiling effects by increasing the number of severity levels. The study was performed in the United Kingdom and Spain. Severity labels for 5 levels in each dimension were identified using response scaling. Focus groups were used to investigate the face and content validity of the new versions, including hypothetical health states generated from those versions. Results Selecting labels at approximately the 25th, 50th, and 75th centiles produced two alternative 5-level versions. Focus group work showed a slight preference for the wording ‘slight-moderate-severe’ problems, with anchors of ‘no problems’ and ‘unable to do’ in the EQ-5D functional dimensions. Similar wording was used in the Pain/Discomfort and Anxiety/Depression dimensions. Hypothetical health states were well understood though participants stressed the need for the internal coherence of health states. Conclusions A 5-level version of the EQ-5D has been developed by the EuroQol Group. Further testing is required to determine whether the new version improves sensitivity and reduces ceiling effects.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Open
                bmjopen
                bmjopen
                BMJ Open
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                2044-6055
                2024
                20 March 2024
                : 14
                : 3
                : e078785
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentMusculoskeletal Research Unit , Ringgold_152331University of Bristol Medical School , Bristol, UK
                [2 ] Ringgold_559522NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre , Bristol, UK
                [3 ] Ringgold_152331University of Bristol Medical School , Bristol, UK
                [4 ] Ringgold_1982North Bristol NHS Trust , Westbury on Trym, UK
                [5 ] Ringgold_8903Cardiff and Vale University Health Board , Cardiff, UK
                [6 ] Ringgold_7315The University of Sheffield , Sheffield, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Wendy Bertram; wendy.bertram@ 123456bristol.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8234-2052
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8654-353X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-1529
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3353-2882
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0012-7103
                Article
                bmjopen-2023-078785
                10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078785
                10961562
                38508646
                fa93c797-d7b2-4f95-885e-a13d9ab5d927
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See:  https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 11 August 2023
                : 19 February 2024
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009128, Research for Patient Benefit Programme;
                Award ID: NIHR201036
                Funded by: Clinical Research Network;
                Funded by: University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust;
                Funded by: NIHR Biomedical Research Centre;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000883, University of Bristol;
                Categories
                Health Services Research
                1506
                1704
                Original research
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Medicine
                knee,sleep medicine,feasibility studies
                Medicine
                knee, sleep medicine, feasibility studies

                Comments

                Comment on this article