0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Patient satisfaction with quality of care of a multidisciplinary thrombosis service – a cross sectional survey

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          In October 2017 we opened a multidisciplinary Adult Outpatient Thrombosis Service (Thrombosis Service) in a regional health authority servicing over 300 000 people. The Thrombosis Service is a comprehensive thrombosis and anticoagulation management program with unique, interrelated clinics providing a broad spectrum of care for this patient group. Evaluation of patient satisfaction with this new model of patient care is an important quality measurement.

          Methods

          We conducted a cross-sectional survey of patients who attended the Thrombosis Service between October 2017 and May 2019. We measured patient satisfaction with the seven-item Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) which uses a 5 point scale (0–4) for responses. The continuous score range for SAPS is 0 to 28. Categorical responses for SAPS are defined as 0–10 very dissatisfied, 11–18 dissatisfied, 19–26 satisfied, and 27–28 very satisfied. We used linear regression analysis to examine the associations between patients’ characteristics and their satisfaction with the Thrombosis Service.

          Results

          Of the 1058 surveys distributed, 563 were returned. The mean score for the SAPS was 22.1 (SD 4.1, range 8 to 28). For the categorical response, 85% were satisfied or very satisfied with the Thrombosis Service. The multivariate analysis showed patients with post-secondary education were more satisfied with the Thrombosis Service (β-coefficient 1.6153, p = 0.024), and patients taking warfarin were less likely to be satisfied with the Thrombosis Service (β-coefficient -1.5832, p = 0.0390).

          Conclusions

          The majority of survey participants (85%) who attended an appointment in one of the Thrombosis Service clinics were satisfied or very satisfied with the care they received. This information may benefit other centres who are interested in developing a program to manage thrombosis and anticoagulation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review.

          A large number of studies have addressed the detection of patient satisfaction determinants, and the results are still inconclusive. Furthermore, it is known that contradicting evidence exists across patient satisfaction studies. This article is the second part of a two-part series of research with a goal to review a current conceptual framework of patient satisfaction for further operationalisation procedures. The aim of this work was to systematically identify and review evidence regarding determinants of patient satisfaction between 1980 and 2014, and to seek the reasons for contradicting results in relationships between determinants and patient satisfaction in the literature to design a further robust measurement system for patient satisfaction.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            When the patient is the expert: measuring patient experience and satisfaction with care

            Abstract In 2018, three independent reports were published, emphasizing the need for attention to, and improvements in, quality of care to achieve effective universal health coverage. A key aspect of high quality health care and health systems is that they are person-centred, a characteristic that is at the same time intrinsically important (all individuals have the right to be treated with dignity and respect) and instrumentally important (person-centred care is associated with improved health-care utilization and health outcomes). Following calls to make 2019 a year of action, we provide guidance to policy-makers, researchers and implementers on how they can take on the task of measuring person-centred care. Theoretically, measures of person-centred care allow quality improvement efforts to be evaluated and ensure that health systems are accountable to those they aim to serve. However, in practice, the utility of these measures is limited by lack of clarity and precision in designing and by using measures for different aspects of person-centeredness. We discuss the distinction between two broad categories of measures of patient-centred care: patient experience and patient satisfaction. We frame our discussion of these measures around three key questions: (i) how will the results of this measure be used?; (ii) how will patient subjectivity be accounted for?; and (iii) is this measure validated or tested? By addressing these issues during the design phase, researchers will increase the usability of their measures.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A critical review of patient satisfaction

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                swyoung@mun.ca
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                23 May 2022
                23 May 2022
                2022
                : 22
                : 685
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.25055.37, ISNI 0000 0000 9130 6822, School of Pharmacy, , Memorial University of Newfoundland, ; 300 Prince Philip Drive, St John’s, NL A1B 3V6 Canada
                [2 ]Pharmacy Program, Eastern Region Health Authority, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St John’s, NL A1B 3V6 Canada
                [3 ] Division of Hematology, Eastern Region Health Authority, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6 Canada
                [4 ]GRID grid.25055.37, ISNI 0000 0000 9130 6822, Division of Medicine (Hematology), , Memorial University of Newfoundland, ; 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6 Canada
                Article
                8089
                10.1186/s12913-022-08089-w
                9125912
                fac8c0e4-2751-4fe7-836b-a33527c64341
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 15 December 2021
                : 13 May 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Sanofi Canada
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013711, Bayer Canada;
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2022

                Health & Social care
                patient satisfaction,patient-centered care,anticoagulation therapy,thrombosis care,multidisciplinary team

                Comments

                Comment on this article