19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      No association between Alport's syndrome and antithyroid antibodies.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The presence of circulating antithyroid antibodies in a small number of patients with Alport's syndrome has led some to suggest that the two abnormalities are associated. If confirmed, such an association could have important diagnostic as well as pathophysiological implications. Using sensitive methods, we assessed the prevalence of antithyroid antibodies in 40 patients with Alport's syndrome from 28 families. Antithyroglobulin antibodies were absent in all patients. Antimicrosomal and antithyroperoxidase antibodies were absent in all but one patient. Three patients with Alport's syndrome from the latter family were negative for antithyroid antibodies. In this large number of patients we found no association between Alport's syndrome and antithyroid antibodies. Screening for the presence of such antibodies in patients with Alport's syndrome is thus not warranted. The previously reported coexistence of the two disorders might be fortuitous.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.
          Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association
          0931-0509
          0931-0509
          1992
          : 7
          : 11
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of General Internal Medicine, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium.
          Article
          1336133
          fad712aa-4bae-4cc4-95ef-6b466b04754a
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article