33
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      An audit of clinical training exposure amongst junior doctors working in Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery in 101 hospitals in the United Kingdom

      research-article
      BOTA Collaborators,
      BMC Medical Education
      BioMed Central
      Surgeons, Training, Orthopaedic, Trauma, Exposure, Surgery

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          There are concerns regarding early years’ training for junior doctors in Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery (T&O) in the United Kingdom. Our primary objective was to audit the clinical activities undertaken by junior doctors working in Trauma & Orthopaedic (T&O) surgery in the National Health Service (NHS) in a typical workweek. A secondary objective was to audit the clinical exposure of junior surgeons in training to the Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCST) standards for minimum weekly clinical exposure in T&O surgery.

          Methods

          We recruited collaborators in 101 T&O surgery departments in NHS hospitals to participate in this study. Clinical activity diaries from 935 doctors working in T&O surgery in the 101 participating NHS hospitals were involved. All junior doctors covering the junior on call tier were included. Collaborators collected clinical activity data from 08:00 18/01/2015 to 20:00 22/01/2015. Clinical activities recorded in sessions (morning, afternoon, evening) depending on what activity that doctor undertook for the majority of that session. Clinical activities were grouped into operating theatre/room, outpatient clinic, on call, “not in work” (i.e. leave, sickness), teaching, and ward cover sessions. The weekly clinical activity of Core Surgical Trainees (CSTs) were analyzed in accordance to two JCST standards for minimum weekly clinical exposure.

          Results

          Overall, junior doctors working in T&O surgery attended a theatre list session 8.5% of the time, an outpatient clinic 3.2%, were on call 14.8%, a teaching session 1.7%, providing ward cover 34.6%, and on a zero session 20.7% of the time. Only 5% of core surgical trainees ( n = 200) met both the JCST standards for minimum weekly clinical exposure in the specialty.

          Conclusions

          Junior surgeons in training, working in Trauma & Orthopaedic surgery in the United Kingdom are not meeting the minimum weekly clinical sessions laid out by the JCST. Further work to develop models allowing for enhanced training experiences and improved clinical exposure to operating lists and outpatient clinics would be beneficial.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-017-1038-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references8

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          What effects have resident work-hour changes had on education, quality of life, and safety? A systematic review.

          More than 15 years ago, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) identified medical error as a problem worthy of greater attention; in the wake of the IOM report, numerous changes were made to regulations to limit residents' duty hours. However, the effect of resident work-hour changes remains controversial within the field of orthopaedics.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluation of procedure-based assessment for assessing trainees' skills in the operating theatre.

            Procedure-based assessment (PBA) is used within most UK surgical training programmes for assessing trainees' procedural skills in the operating theatre. All postgraduate assessment methods require evidence to support their implementation. The aims were to evaluate the validity, reliability and acceptability of PBA. Eighty-one trainees in six surgical specialties were assessed performing common procedures; 749 PBAs were provided across 348 operations by 57 clinical supervisors and four independent assessors. Construct validity was demonstrated by correlation of PBA scores with measures of surgical training and experience. Reliability (G exceeding 0·8) of the adjusted total item score and global summary score for a given procedure was achieved using four and three assessor judgements respectively; assessing a mix of procedures required more cases/assessors because performance is procedure specific. The acceptability of PBA for assessment and feedback within surgical training was predominantly positive among clinical supervisors and trainees. PBA demonstrated good overall validity and acceptability, and exceptionally high reliability. Trainees should be assessed adequately for each given procedure. Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Procedure-based assessments in trauma and orthopaedic training--The trainees' perspective.

              The study aimed to gain an understanding of the attitudes of trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) trainees regarding procedure-based assessments (PBAs) and identify factors that influence any perceived educational benefit.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +44 (0) 7584033470 , mustafa.rashid@ndorms.ox.ac.uk
                Journal
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Medical Education
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6920
                2 January 2018
                2 January 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 1
                Affiliations
                Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LD England
                Article
                1038
                10.1186/s12909-017-1038-5
                5749005
                29291730
                fb45b709-b16d-4c79-90f4-eb853fbb8eb0
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 28 March 2017
                : 2 November 2017
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Education
                surgeons,training,orthopaedic,trauma,exposure,surgery
                Education
                surgeons, training, orthopaedic, trauma, exposure, surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article