5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The effect of peer-group size on the delivery of feedback in basic life support refresher training: a cluster randomized controlled trial

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Students are largely providing feedback to one another when instructor facilitates peer feedback rather than teaching in group training. The number of students in a group affect the learning of students in the group training. We aimed to investigate whether a larger group size increases students’ test scores on a post-training test with peer feedback facilitated by instructor after video-guided basic life support (BLS) refresher training. Students’ one-rescuer adult BLS skills were assessed by a 2-min checklist-based test 1 year after the initial training.

          Methods

          A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of student number in a group on BLS refresher training. Participants included 115 final-year medical students undergoing their emergency medicine clerkship. The median number of students was 8 in the large groups and 4 in the standard group. The primary outcome was to examine group differences in post-training test scores after video-guided BLS training. Secondary outcomes included the feedback time, number of feedback topics, and results of end-of-training evaluation questionnaires.

          Results

          Scores on the post-training test increased over three consecutive tests with instructor-led peer feedback, but not differ between large and standard groups. The feedback time was longer and number of feedback topics generated by students were higher in standard groups compared to large groups on the first and second tests. The end-of-training questionnaire revealed that the students in large groups preferred the smaller group size compared to their actual group size.

          Conclusions

          In this BLS refresher training, the instructor-led group feedback increased the test score after tutorial video-guided BLS learning, irrespective of the group size. A smaller group size allowed more participations in peer feedback.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0682-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Part 16: education, implementation, and teams: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.

          Optimizing the links in the Chain of Survival improves outcomes and saves lives. The use of evidence-based education and implementation strategies will allow organizations and communities to strengthen these links in the most effective and efficient manner.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 9. Principles of education in resuscitation.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Foundation Programme assessment tools: an opportunity to enhance feedback to trainees?

              The recent change in working patterns of doctors in training has meant that the traditional systems of education are under increasing pressure and that there is the need to maximise new opportunities for learning. One new opportunity may arise after the introduction of the mandatory assessment systems (Mini-CEX, DOPPS, Multi-source feedback, and Case based discussion) in the Foundation Programmes. In this review the new assessment procedures for the Foundation Programmes are outlined and the potential of these assessments (using Mini-CEX as main example) as an opportunity to give feedback to trainees discussed. The importance of feedback in professional development and some of the techniques available for giving feedback are described. The Foundation Programme assessments will occupy a significant amount of trainees' and trainers' time and it is important that opportunity for feedback and learning is maximised.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                ontheera@gmail.com
                Journal
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Med Educ
                BMC Medical Education
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6920
                4 July 2016
                4 July 2016
                2016
                : 16
                : 167
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [ ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Cha University Bundang Medical Center, 59 Yatap-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, 463-712 Gyeonggi-do South Korea
                [ ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
                [ ]Department of Medical Education, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
                [ ]Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [ ]Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                [ ]Department of Emergency Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
                Article
                682
                10.1186/s12909-016-0682-5
                4932763
                27378162
                fb6140a7-7957-4f27-b05f-4f6ef56adac2
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 21 December 2015
                : 1 June 2016
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Education
                cardiac arrest,cardiopulmonary resuscitation,basic life support,training,instructor,medical education,undergraduate medical education,educational assessment,feedback

                Comments

                Comment on this article