15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      E4 Antibodies Facilitate Detection and Type-Assignment of Active HPV Infection in Cervical Disease

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are the cause of nearly all cases of cervical cancer. Although the detection of HPV DNA has proved useful in cervical diagnosis, it does not necessarily predict disease presence or severity, and cannot conclusively identify the causative type when multiple HPVs are present. Such limitations may be addressed using complementary approaches such as cytology, laser capture microscopy, and/or the use of infection biomarkers. One such infection biomarker is the HPV E4 protein, which is expressed at high level in cells that are supporting (or have supported) viral genome amplification. Its distribution in lesions has suggested a role in disease staging. Here we have examined whether type-specific E4 antibodies may also allow the identification and/or confirmation of causal HPV-type. To do this, type-specific polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies against three E4 proteins (HPV-16, -18, and -58) were generated and validated by ELISA and western blotting, and by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of epithelial rafts containing these individual HPV types. Type-specific detection of HPV and its associated disease was subsequently examined using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cervical intra-epithelial neoplasias (CIN, (n = 247)) and normal controls (n = 28). All koilocytotic CIN1 lesions showed type-specific E4 expression of their respective HPV types. Differences were noted amongst E4 expression patterns in CIN3. HPV-18 E4 was not detected in any of the 6 HPV-18 DNA-positive CIN3 lesions examined, whereas in HPV-16 and -58 CIN3, 28/37 (76%) and 5/9 (55.6%) expressed E4 respectively, usually in regions of epithelial differentiation. Our results demonstrate that type-specific E4 antibodies can be used to help establish causality, as may be required when multiple HPV types are detected. The unique characteristics of the E4 biomarker suggest a role in diagnosis and patient management particularly when used in combination.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women

          The Lancet, 374(9686), 301-314
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Efficacy of a prophylactic adjuvanted bivalent L1 virus-like-particle vaccine against infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: an interim analysis of a phase III double-blind, randomised controlled trial

            The Lancet, 369(9580), 2161-2170
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Sustained efficacy up to 4.5 years of a bivalent L1 virus-like particle vaccine against human papillomavirus types 16 and 18: follow-up from a randomised control trial.

              Effective vaccination against HPV 16 and HPV 18 to prevent cervical cancer will require a high level of sustained protection against infection and precancerous lesions. Our aim was to assess the long-term efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of a bivalent HPV-16/18 L1 virus-like particle AS04 vaccine against incident and persistent infection with HPV 16 and HPV 18 and their associated cytological and histological outcomes. We did a follow-up study of our multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial reported in 2004. We included women who originally received all three doses of bivalent HPV-16/18 virus-like particle AS04 vaccine (0.5 mL; n=393) or placebo (n=383). We assessed HPV DNA, using cervical samples, and did yearly cervical cytology assessments. We also studied the long-term immunogenicity and safety of the vaccine. More than 98% seropositivity was maintained for HPV-16/18 antibodies during the extended follow-up phase. We noted significant vaccine efficacy against HPV-16 and HPV-18 endpoints: incident infection, 96.9% (95% CI 81.3-99.9); persistent infection: 6 month definition, 94.3 (63.2-99.9); 12 month definition, 100% (33.6-100). In a combined analysis of the initial efficacy and extended follow-up studies, vaccine efficacy of 100% (42.4-100) against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) lesions associated with vaccine types. We noted broad protection against cytohistological outcomes beyond that anticipated for HPV 16/18 and protection against incident infection with HPV 45 and HPV 31. The vaccine has a good long-term safety profile. Up to 4.5 years, the HPV-16/18 L1 virus-like particle AS04 vaccine is highly immunogenic and safe, and induces a high degree of protection against HPV-16/18 infection and associated cervical lesions. There is also evidence of cross protection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2012
                3 December 2012
                : 7
                : 12
                : e49974
                Affiliations
                [1 ]National Institute for Medical Research, London, United Kingdom
                [2 ]GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium
                [3 ]XpePharma and Science, Wavre, Belgium
                [4 ]DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Voorburg, The Netherlands
                National Institute of Health - National Cancer Institute, United States of America
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: VD, FS, BC and DJ are or were, at the time of the study, employees of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart. CVH is an employee of XpePharma and Science, Wavre. AM, WQ and DJ are employees of DDL Diagnostic Laboratory. BC and FS own shares and options to shares in GSK. JD is designated inventor on United Kingdom patent PCT/GB97/03321 (filed in December 1997) and PCT/GB01/01176 (filed in April 2001) owned by MRC. There are no other products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, as detailed online in the guide for authors.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: HG ZW VD AM WQ CVH FS BC DJ JD. Performed the experiments: HG ZW RM VD JD DJ. Analyzed the data: HG ZW RM VD AM WQ CVH FS BC DJ JD. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: HG AM WQ BC DJ JD. Wrote the paper: HG ZW BC DJ JD. Peptide selection for antibody generation: JD.

                ¶ These authors are joint senior authors on this work.

                Article
                PONE-D-11-22415
                10.1371/journal.pone.0049974
                3513315
                23226504
                fb644151-3737-4128-a48a-f4fc78122320
                Copyright @ 2012

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 1 November 2011
                : 19 October 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 15
                Funding
                No current external funding sources for this study.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Microbiology
                Virology
                Viral Disease Diagnosis
                Viruses and Cancer
                Medicine
                Clinical Immunology
                Immunologic Techniques
                Immunohistochemical Analysis
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Pathology
                Infectious Diseases
                Sexually Transmitted Diseases
                Human Papillomavirus Infection
                Viral Diseases
                Human Papillomavirus Infection
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Genitourinary Infections
                Human Papillomavirus Infection

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article