0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      AZU1: a new promising marker for infection in orthopedic and trauma patients?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Early and reliable detection of infection is vital for successful treatment. Serum markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) are known to increase with a time lag. Azurocidin 1 (AZU1) has emerged as a promising marker for septic patients, but its diagnostic value in orthopedic and trauma patients remains unexplored. Between July 2020 and August 2023, all patients necessitating inpatient treatment for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), peri-implant infection (II), soft tissue infection, chronic osteomyelitis, septic arthrodesis, bone non-union with and without infection were enrolled. Patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty (TJA) served as the control group. Blood samples were collected and analyzed for CRP, white blood cell count (WBC), PCT, and AZU1. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria 222 patients were included in the study (trauma = 38, soft tissue infection = 75, TJA = 33, PJI/II = 39, others = 37). While sensitivity and specificity were comparably high for AZU1 (0.734/0.833), CRP and PCT had higher specificity (0.542/1 and 0.431/1, respectively), and WBC a slightly higher sensitivity (0.814/0.455) for septic conditions. Taken together, the area under the curve (AUC) showed the highest accuracy for AZU1 (0.790), followed by CRP (0.776), WBC (0.641), and PCT (0.656). The Youden-Index was 0.57 for AZU1, 0.54 for CRP, 0.27 for WBC, and 0.43 for PCT. Elevated AZU1 levels effectively distinguished patients with a healthy condition from those suffering from infection. However, there is evidence suggesting that trauma may influence the release of AZU1. Additional research is needed to validate the diagnostic value of this new biomarker and further explore its potential clinical applications.

          Related collections

          Most cited references20

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Index for rating diagnostic tests

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Sepsis biomarkers: a review

              Introduction Biomarkers can be useful for identifying or ruling out sepsis, identifying patients who may benefit from specific therapies or assessing the response to therapy. Methods We used an electronic search of the PubMed database using the key words "sepsis" and "biomarker" to identify clinical and experimental studies which evaluated a biomarker in sepsis. Results The search retrieved 3370 references covering 178 different biomarkers. Conclusions Many biomarkers have been evaluated for use in sepsis. Most of the biomarkers had been tested clinically, primarily as prognostic markers in sepsis; relatively few have been used for diagnosis. None has sufficient specificity or sensitivity to be routinely employed in clinical practice. PCT and CRP have been most widely used, but even these have limited ability to distinguish sepsis from other inflammatory conditions or to predict outcome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                EXCLI J
                EXCLI J
                EXCLI J
                EXCLI Journal
                Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors
                1611-2156
                03 January 2024
                2024
                : 23
                : 53-61
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Schnarrenbergstr. 95, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
                [2 ]Siegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research, BG Unfallklinik Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
                [3 ]Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
                Author notes
                *To whom correspondence should be addressed: Andreas K. Nüssler, Siegfried Weller Institute for Trauma Research, BG Unfallklinik Tuebingen, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany, E-mail: andreas.nuessler@ 123456med.uni-tuebingen.de
                Article
                2023-6705 Doc53
                10.17179/excli2023-6705
                10864703
                38357095
                fcc43428-42cd-4bc8-beaa-edc5b7f98fb8
                Copyright © 2024 Hemmann et al.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 23 October 2023
                : 06 December 2023
                Categories
                Original Article

                azu1,hbp,orthopedic surgery,infection,trauma surgery
                azu1, hbp, orthopedic surgery, infection, trauma surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article