27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Effects of fruit and vegetable, consumed in solid vs. beverage forms on acute and chronic appetitive responses in lean and obese adults

      research-article
      , PhD, , PhD, , PhD, , PhD
      International journal of obesity (2005)
      Solid, beverages, fruits, vegetables, appetite

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The effects of fruits and vegetables in solid vs. beverage forms on human appetite and food intake acutely and over eight weeks, are unclear.

          Methods

          This 21-week, randomised, crossover study assessed appetitive ratings following the inclusion of fruits and vegetables, in solid and beverage form, into the habitual diet of healthy lean (n=15) and overweight/obese (n=19) adults with low customary consumption. The primary acute outcomes were satiation (amount of challenge meal consumed), satiety (latency of subsequent eating event), and dietary compensation after a 400 kcal fruit preload. Ratings of appetite were also obtained before and after 8 weeks of required increased fruit and vegetable consumption (20% estimated energy requirement).

          Results

          Acutely, overweight/obese participants reported smaller reductions of hunger after consuming the fruit preload in beverage compared to solid form (preload × form × BMI effects, P=0.030). Participants also consumed significantly less of a challenge meal (in both gram and energy) after the ingestion of the solid fruit preload (P<0.005). However, the subsequent meal latency was not significantly different between the solid and the beverage fruit preloads. Total daily energy intake was significantly higher when the obese participants consumed the beverage fruit preload compared to the solid (P<0.001). Daily energy intake was markedly, but not significantly, higher among the lean with the beverage versus solid food-form. Hunger and fullness ratings remained stable when participants consumed fruits and vegetables in solid or beverage form for eight weeks each.

          Conclusion

          Acute post-ingestive appetitive responses were weaker following consumption of fruits in beverage versus solid food-forms. Consumption of beverage or solid fruit and vegetable food loads for 8 weeks did not chronically alter appetitive responses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references82

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger.

          This report describes the construction of a questionnaire to measure three dimensions of human eating behavior. The first step was a collation of items from two existing questionnaires that measure the related concepts of 'restrained eating' and 'latent obesity', to which were added items newly written to elucidate these concepts. This version was administered to several populations selected to include persons who exhibited the spectrum from extreme dietary restraint to extreme lack of restraint. The resulting responses were factor analyzed and the resulting factor structure was used to revise the questionnaire. This process was then repeated: administration of the revised questionnaire to groups representing extremes of dietary restraint, factor analysis of the results and questionnaire revision. Three stable factors emerged: (1) 'cognitive restraint of eating', (2) 'disinhibition' and (3) 'hunger'. The new 51-item questionnaire measuring these factors is presented.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Position of the American Dietetic Association: health implications of dietary fiber.

            L Slavin (2008)
            It is the position of the American Dietetic Association that the public should consume adequate amounts of dietary fiber from a variety of plant foods. Populations that consume more dietary fiber have less chronic disease. In addition, intake of dietary fiber has beneficial effects on risk factors for developing several chronic diseases. Dietary Reference Intakes recommend consumption of 14 g dietary fiber per 1,000 kcal, or 25 g for adult women and 38 g for adult men, based on epidemiologic studies showing protection against cardiovascular disease. Appropriate kinds and amounts of dietary fiber for children, the critically ill, and the very old are unknown. The Dietary Reference Intakes for fiber are based on recommended energy intake, not clinical fiber studies. Usual intake of dietary fiber in the United States is only 15 g/day. Although solubility of fiber was thought to determine physiological effect, more recent studies suggest other properties of fiber, perhaps fermentability or viscosity are important parameters. High-fiber diets provide bulk, are more satiating, and have been linked to lower body weights. Evidence that fiber decreases cancer is mixed and further research is needed. Healthy children and adults can achieve adequate dietary fiber intakes by increasing variety in daily food patterns. Dietary messages to increase consumption of high-fiber foods such as whole grains, legumes, fruits, and vegetables should be broadly supported by food and nutrition professionals. Consumers are also turning to fiber supplements and bulk laxatives as additional fiber sources. Few fiber supplements have been studied for physiological effectiveness, so the best advice is to consume fiber in foods. Look for physiological studies of effectiveness before selecting functional fibers in dietetics practice.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Increased consumption of refined carbohydrates and the epidemic of type 2 diabetes in the United States: an ecologic assessment.

              Type 2 diabetes is an epidemic that is affecting an ever-increasing proportion of the US population. Although consumption of refined carbohydrates has increased and is thought to be related to the increased risk of type 2 diabetes, the ecologic effect of changes in the quality of carbohydrates in the food supply on the risk of type 2 diabetes remains to be quantified. The objective was to examine the correlation between consumption of refined carbohydrates and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in the United States. In this ecologic correlation study, the per capita nutrient consumption in the United States between 1909 and 1997 obtained from the US Department of Agriculture was compared with the prevalence of type 2 diabetes obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In a univariate analysis, a significant correlation with diabetes prevalence was observed for dietary fat (r = 0.84, P < 0.001), carbohydrate (r = 0.55, P < 0.001), protein (r = 0.71, P < 0.001), fiber (r = 0.16, P = 0.03), corn syrup (r = 0.83, P < 0.001), and total energy (r = 0.75, P < 0.001) intakes. In a multivariate nutrient-density model, in which total energy intake was accounted for, corn syrup was positively associated with the prevalence of type 2 diabetes (beta = 0.0132, P = 0.038). Fiber (beta = -13.86, P < 0.01) was negatively associated with the prevalence of type 2 diabetes. In contrast, protein (P = 0.084) and fat (P = 0.79) were not associated with the prevalence of type 2 diabetes when total energy was controlled for. Increasing intakes of refined carbohydrate (corn syrup) concomitant with decreasing intakes of fiber paralleled the upward trend in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes observed in the United States during the 20th century.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                101256108
                32579
                Int J Obes (Lond)
                Int J Obes (Lond)
                International journal of obesity (2005)
                0307-0565
                1476-5497
                12 October 2012
                20 November 2012
                August 2013
                01 February 2014
                : 37
                : 8
                : 1109-1115
                Affiliations
                Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, Stone Hall, 700 W State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, U.S.A
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Richard D. Mattes, PhD, Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, 212 Stone Hall, 700 W State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2059, Phone: +1 765-494-0662, Fax: +1 765-494-0674, mattes@ 123456purdue.edu
                Article
                NIHMS414096
                10.1038/ijo.2012.183
                3582731
                23164702
                fcfb5a72-8d37-4607-800f-b1bf1e5d94f0

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases : NIDDK
                Award ID: R01 DK063185 || DK
                Categories
                Article

                Nutrition & Dietetics
                solid,beverages,fruits,vegetables,appetite
                Nutrition & Dietetics
                solid, beverages, fruits, vegetables, appetite

                Comments

                Comment on this article