10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access
      Annals of translational medicine
      AME Publishing Company
      small-pupil cataract, nucleus splitting technique, reverse chopper, phacoemulsification

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          To analyze the value of a prechop technique for splitting the nucleus of the lens using a reverse chopper in small-pupil cataract surgeries. A prospective case-control study. Thirty-four cataract patients (34 eyes) who were treated in our center from March 2019 to December 2019 were enrolled and then divided into two groups: small pupil group (18 patients; 18 eyes) and normal pupil group (16 patients; 16 eyes).

          Methods

          The prechop technique was applied in both groups, and the patients were followed up for three months. The best-corrected visual acuity (BVCA), surgical complications, corneal endothelial cell loss, pupil function, operative time, and cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) were compared between these two groups, and the safety of the nucleus-chopping technique was evaluated. Data were analyzed using the SPSS 23.0 software packages. BVCA, surgical complications, rate of corneal endothelial cell loss, pupil function, operative time, and CDE.

          Results

          The surgery was smooth in all cases. The operative time, intraoperative ultrasound energy consumption, BVCA, and surgical complications indicated no significant difference between the two groups (all P>0.05). In the small pupil group, BVCA was significantly improved after surgery and achieved its optimal value three months after surgery (χ 2=49.38; P=0). The diameter of the pupil was about 3.22 mm in the small pupil group before nucleus chopping. The postoperative pupil morphology was not statistically different from that before surgery (pupil morphology: χ 2=0.131; P=0.717); however, the pupillary light reflex was significantly improved after surgery (χ 2=8.378; P=0.004), and the pupil diameter was significantly increased (T=−3.494; P=0.003). The rate of corneal endothelial cell loss was higher in small pupil group than in the normal pupil group in the 3rd postoperative month, but the difference was not statistically significant (T=−0.023; P=0.982).

          Conclusions

          The prechop technique using a reverse chopper in small-pupil cataract surgery occupies a similar operative time, cumulative energy consumption during operation, BVCA, pupil morphology, and rate of corneal endothelial cell loss, comparing with those in normal-pupil cataract surgery. To such a degree, it is a safe, high-efficiency, a simple and easy-to-operate nucleus-chopping technique that can be used in small-pupil cataract surgery.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Risk Factors for Posterior Capsule Rupture and Vitreous Loss during Phacoemulsification

          Purpose To determine the rate and risk factors of vitreous loss during phacoemulsification in patients with cataracts operated by ophthalmology residents and fellows at Labbafinejad Medical Center. Methods This prospective descriptive study included consecutive patients with cataracts undergoing phacoemulsification over a one year period. All patients were operated under local or general anesthesia using the divide and conquer technique. Preoperatively, all patients underwent a complete ocular examination including measurement of visual acuity, slitlamp biomicroscopy, intraocular pressure measurement, and dilated funduscopy. Main outcome measures included the rate of posterior capsular rupture and vitreous loss as well as associated risk factors such as surgical experience, ocular and systemic conditions, and type and severity of the cataract. Results Overall, 767 eyes of 767 patients with mean age of 63.7±10.3 (range, 25–91) years were operated. The overall rate of vitreous loss was 7.9% which was 5-fold greater in the hands of residents as compared to fellows. Among different factors, older age, female sex, small pupil, small capsulorrhexis, presence of pseudoexfoliation, and high myopia were significantly associated with vitreous loss. The highest rate of vitreous loss occurred in patients with dense nuclear cataracts. Conclusion Considering the higher rate of vitreous loss in patients operated by ophthalmology residents; patients with known risk factors for vitreous loss should better be operated by more experienced surgeons.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Management of the small pupil for clear corneal cataract surgery.

            To evaluate the benefits of using the Perfect Pupil expansion device (Becton Dickinson Ophthalmic Surgical) for cataract surgery. Eye Laser Center, Tucson, Arizona, USA. Thirty patients whose pupils failed to dilate beyond 4.0 mm were selected to have the Perfect Pupil used during their cataract surgery. The Perfect Pupil was inserted through an unenlarged 2.8 mm clear corneal incision into the pupillary aperture. The capsulorhexis, hydrodissection, phacoemulsification, and injection of the intraocular lens were performed through the expanded pupil with the device in place. The pupil size before, during, and after surgery was measured. The mean pupil size was 3.2 mm preoperatively, 7.8 mm after insertion of the device, and 4.3 mm after its removal. There were no cases of iris sphincter tear, bleeding, ruptured capsule, or irregular pupil postoperatively. The Perfect Pupil was beneficial during small-incision cataract surgery in cases in which the pupil failed to dilate adequately. The device was easy to insert and remove, expanded the pupil to approximately 8.0 mm, protected the iris sphincter during surgery, and allowed the pupil to return to its normal size, shape, and function postoperatively.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Cataract surgery in small pupils

              This paper presents the review of historical aspects and the current state-of-the-art in various pupil dilatation methods to be used in cataract surgery. The surgical algorithm in managing small pupil cases should include topical and intraocular mydriatics, appropriately selected viscosurgical device and mechanical dilatation with instruments, iris hooks, and/or pupil expanders.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Ann Transl Med
                Ann Transl Med
                ATM
                Annals of Translational Medicine
                AME Publishing Company
                2305-5839
                2305-5847
                September 2020
                September 2020
                : 8
                : 18
                : 1189
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University , Beijing, China;
                [2 ]Medical School, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan, China;
                [3 ]Liaocheng People’s Hospital , Liaocheng, China;
                [4 ]Chaoyang Central Hospital, Chaoyang, China
                Author notes

                Contributions: (I) Conception and design: Y Zhao; (II) Administrative support: K Yang; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: C Song, J Li; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: W Zhang, Z Liu; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: J Li; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

                Correspondence to: Yang Zhao, MD. Dongjiaominxiang 1st, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China. Email: doctor.zy@ 123456qq.com .
                [^]

                ORCID: Ke Yang: 0000-0002-8354-3136; Chenjie Song: 0000-0003-0997-922X; Jiaxin Li: 0000-0002-1543-3576; Weihua Zhang: 0000-0002-6988-2318; Zhanjiang Liu: 0000-0002-9727-0394.

                Article
                atm-08-18-1189
                10.21037/atm-20-5241
                7576071
                33241038
                fd288d67-b202-42fa-9f8f-1bb1056e8208
                2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

                Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0.

                History
                : 01 May 2020
                : 08 September 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                small-pupil cataract,nucleus splitting technique,reverse chopper,phacoemulsification

                Comments

                Comment on this article