Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
30
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Comparison of synthetic bone graft ABM/P-15 and allograft on uninstrumented posterior lumbar spine fusion in sheep

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Spinal fusion is a commonly used procedure in spinal surgery. To ensure stable fusion, bone graft materials are used. ABM/P-15 (commercial name i-Factor™ Flex) is an available synthetic bone graft material that has CE approval in Europe. This peptide has been shown to improve bone formation when used in devices with fixation or on bone defects. However, the lack of external stability and large graft size make posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) a most challenging grafting procedure. This prospective randomized study was designed to evaluate early spinal fusion rates using an anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix (ABM) combined with a synthetic 15 amino acid sequence (P-15)–ABM/P-15 bone graft, and compared with allograft in an uninstrumented PLF model in sheep. The objective of this study was to assess fusion rates when using ABM/P-15 in uninstrumented posterolateral fusion in sheep.

          Methods

          Twelve Texas/Gotland mixed breed sheep underwent open PLF at 2 levels L2/L3 and L4/L5 without fixation instruments. The levels were randomized so that sheep received an ABM graft either with or without P15 coating. Sheep were euthanized after 4.5 months and levels were harvested and evaluated with a micro-CT scanner and qualitative histology. Fusion rates were assessed by 2D sections and 3D reconstruction images and fusion was defined as intertransverse bridging.

          Results

          There was 68% fusion rate in the allograft group and an extensive migration of graft material was noticed with a fusion rate of just 37% in the ABM/P-15 group. Qualitative histology showed positive osteointegration of the material and good correlation to scanning results.

          Conclusions

          In this PLF fusion model, ABM/P15 demonstrated the ability to migrate when lacking external stability. Due to this migration, reported fusion rates were significantly lower than in the allograft group. The use of ABM/P15 as i-Factor™ Flex may be limited to devices with fixation and bone defects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Bone substitutes: an update.

          Autograft is considered ideal for grafting procedures, providing osteoinductive growth factors, osteogenic cells, and an osteoconductive scaffold. Limitations, however, exist regarding donor site morbidity and graft availability. Allograft on the other hand, posses the risk of disease transmission. Synthetic graft substitutes lack osteoinductive or osteogenic properties. Composite grafts combine scaffolding properties with biological elements to stimulate cell proliferation and differentiation and eventually osteogenesis. We present here an overview of bone grafts and graft substitutes available for clinical applications.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts. A review of complications and techniques.

            Autogenous bone grafts from the ilium are frequently harvested for purposes of bone union and/or stability. Although some donor site complications may be unavoidable, awareness of the anatomy and complications may aid in planning the approach and minimizing the risks. Documented donor site complications include pain, nerve and arterial injury, peritoneal perforation, sacroiliac joint instability, and herniation of abdominal contents through defects in the ilium. Strict observation of relevant anatomic considerations will help in avoiding these complications.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                martin.axelsen@rsyd.dk
                soeren.overgaard@rsyd.dk
                stig.mindedahl.jespersen@rsyd.dk
                + 45 6541 3598 , ming.ding@rsyd.dk
                Journal
                J Orthop Surg Res
                J Orthop Surg Res
                Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1749-799X
                3 January 2019
                3 January 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0512 5013, GRID grid.7143.1, Department of Orthopedic Surgery & Traumatology, Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, , Odense University Hospital, ; J.B. Winsloewsvej 15, 3rd floor, 5000 Odense, Denmark
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0728 0170, GRID grid.10825.3e, Department of Clinical Research, , University of Southern Denmark, ; 5000 Odense, Denmark
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6610-8079
                Article
                1042
                10.1186/s13018-018-1042-4
                6318885
                30606209
                fd6e94f2-beba-4562-9bfc-7355c9fb0079
                © The Author(s). 2019

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 31 August 2018
                : 18 December 2018
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2019

                Surgery
                posterolateral spinal fusion,abm/p-15,sheep,micro-ct,histology
                Surgery
                posterolateral spinal fusion, abm/p-15, sheep, micro-ct, histology

                Comments

                Comment on this article