11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Anorectal functions after perineal and retropubic radical prostatectomy – a prospective clinical and anal manometric assessment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The aim of this study is to evaluate the anorectal functions of prostate cancer patients who have undergone radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) or radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) surgery.

          Material and methods

          Thirty-seven patients with an indication for radical prostatectomy were included after informed consent. Anorectal manometry was performed before and one month after the surgery in 22 RPP and 15 RRP patients in our clinic. Clinical assessment was evaluated by anorectal functions with anal incontinence scoring (AIS) (Fernandez; no incontinence = 0; maximal incontinence = 12). Patients with a history of anorectal surgery were excluded from the study. The following data were recorded: external anal sphincteric pressure (EASP), internal anal sphincteric pressure (IASP), minimum ano-rectal reflex volume (MARRV) and minimum rectal sensory volume (MRSV).

          Results

          In the RPP and RRP groups, the mean age was 66 (56-75) and 64.3 (52-73) years, respectively. In the RPP group, EASP and IASP values showed a significant decrease after the surgery. In the RRP group, EASP and IASP were also decreased after the surgery, but without statistical significance. No significant change was seen in MARRV and MRSV of either group. When the scores of AIS were analysed, no significant clinical difference between pre- or post-operative scores was seen in RPP and RRP groups.

          Conclusions

          Perineal or retropubic surgery may injure pelvic floor muscles and/or supplying nerves, which likely causes anorectal dysfunction. Although there is a significant decrease in early postoperative EASP and IASP after RPP, it has no clinical significance according to AIS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references10

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Community-based prevalence of anal incontinence.

          To determine the prevalence of and characteristics associated with anal incontinence in the general community. Community survey. The population of the state of Wisconsin sampled in the Wisconsin Family Health Survey. Subjects were identified by random digit dialing with telephone interview. The individual within each household identified as most knowledgeable about the health status of all other members of the household was asked about the health status of each member of the household. Approximately 200 households were surveyed each month. The presence of anal incontinence to solid or liquid feces or gas, who suffered from it, the frequency of anal incontinence, and how the incontinent person coped with it. A total of 2570 households comprising 6959 individuals were surveyed, and 153 individuals were reported to have anal incontinence, representing 2.2% of the population (95% confidence interval [Cl], +/- 0.3%). Thirty percent of the incontinent subjects were older than 65 years, and 63% were women. Of those with anal incontinence, 36% were incontinent to solid feces, 54% to liquid feces, and 60% to gas. In a multivariate analysis, independent associations of the following risk factors with anal incontinence were found: female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.5; Cl, 1.1 to 2.1), age (continuously adjusted) (OR, 1.01; Cl, 1.01 to 1.02), physical limitations (OR, 1.8; Cl, 1.2 to 2.7), and poor general health (OR, 1.6; Cl, 1.4 to 1.9). Anal incontinence was reported in 2.2% of the general population. Independent risk factors for incontinence include female sex, advancing age, poor general health, and physical limitations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Significance of pelvic floor muscles in anal incontinence.

            The pathophysiology of anal incontinence may be elusive using current parameters. Our aim was to establish the role of the levator ani in anal continence. In 53 patients with anal incontinence, 30 with constipation as disease controls, and 15 healthy controls, we evaluated incontinence severity by a 0-12 scale, anorectal function by standard manometric tests, and levator ani contraction by a perineal dynamometer. Patients with incontinence exhibited various physiologic abnormalities (3.2 +/- 0.3 per patient), but multiple regression analysis showed that levator ani contraction was the independent variable with strongest relation to the severity of incontinence (R = -0.84; P < 0.0001), as well as a predictive factor of the response to treatment (R = 0.53; P < 0.01). Furthermore, in contrast to other physiologic parameters, clinical improvement in response to treatment (4.4 +/- 0.5 score vs. 7.9 +/- 0.5 score pre; P < 0.001) was associated with a marked and significant strengthening of levator ani contraction (448 +/- 47 g vs. 351 +/- 35 g pre; P < 0.05). We have shown the importance of levator ani failure in understanding the etiology of anal incontinence and in predicting response to treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Recovery of health related quality of life in the year after radical prostatectomy: early experience.

              We determined the temporal course of patient return to baseline quality of life after treatment with radical prostatectomy for early stage prostate cancer. After establishing a longitudinal observational database of men undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy we used established, validated quality of life questionnaires (RAND 36-Item Health Survey and University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index) to document changes in general and disease specific health related quality of life (HRQOL). We assessed 90 patients at baseline before surgery and then at 3-month intervals for 1 year postoperatively. Logistic regression was used to explore predictors of the return to baseline. After prostatectomy patients had a significant decrease in all domains of HRQOL. Return to baseline was rapid in the general and bowel domains with at least two-thirds to three-fourths of patients reaching pretreatment levels within 6 months of surgery. Return to baseline was slower in the urinary and sexual function domains with 61 and 31% of the men, respectively, reaching pretreatment levels by 1 year after surgery. Of those who reached baseline the average intervals for the bowel, sexual and urinary domains were 5, 6 and 7 months, respectively. Married and white patients were more likely to achieve a return to baseline HRQOL during year 1 postoperatively. However, education level was inversely associated with the likelihood of returning to baseline. During the year after radical prostatectomy for early stage prostate cancer patient quality of life steadily improved. By 3 months postoperatively 30 to 40% of the patients had already recovered baseline levels of physical, mental and social functioning, and by 6 months more than 70% had reached baseline in the general HRQOL domains. By 12 months after surgery 86 to 97% of the patients had returned to baseline levels in each domain. Each domain continued to improve throughout the year. For the patients who reached baseline general HRQOL during followup average recovery time was 5 to 6 months.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Arch Med Sci
                AMS
                Archives of Medical Science : AMS
                Termedia Publishing House
                1734-1922
                1896-9151
                February 2011
                8 March 2011
                : 7
                : 1
                : 138-142
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
                [2 ]Osmaniye State Hospital, Osmaniye, Turkey
                [3 ]Marmara University School of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology, Istanbul, Turkey
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Onder Canguven MD, Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Kartal Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Anabina 9. Kat, 2. Üroloji Klinigi, E-5 Yolu Uzeri Cevizli-Maltepe 34865 Istanbul, Turkey, Phone: +90 216 441 3900, Fax: +90 216 352 0083. E-mail: ocanguven@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                AMS-7-1-138
                10.5114/aoms.2011.20619
                3258702
                22291747
                fdac5b8e-9090-44df-94bc-babc1f9f9c84
                Copyright © 2011 Termedia & Banach

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 2 May 2010
                : 30 May 2010
                : 9 June 2010
                Categories
                Clinical Research

                Medicine
                prostatic neoplasms,anal incontinence,prostate,perineum
                Medicine
                prostatic neoplasms, anal incontinence, prostate, perineum

                Comments

                Comment on this article