3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Endocannabinoid system mediates the association between gut-microbial diversity and anhedonia/amotivation in a general population cohort

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Anhedonia and amotivation are debilitating symptoms and represent unmet therapeutic needs in a range of clinical conditions. The gut-microbiome-endocannabinoid axis might represent a potential modifiable target for interventions. Based on results obtained from animal models, we tested the hypothesis that the endocannabinoid system mediates the association between gut-microbiome diversity and anhedonia/amotivation in a general population cohort. We used longitudinal data collected from 786 volunteer twins recruited as part the TwinsUK register. Our hypothesis was tested with a multilevel mediation model using family structure as random intercept. The model was set using alpha diversity (within-individual gut-microbial diversity) as predictor, serum and faecal levels of the endocannabinoid palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) as mediator, and anhedonia/amotivation as outcome. PEA is considered the endogenous equivalent of cannabidiol, with increased serum levels believed to have anti-depressive effects, while increased stool PEA levels, reflecting increased excretion, are believed to have opposite, detrimental, effects on mental health. We therefore expected that either reduced serum PEA or increased stool PEA would mediate the association between microbial diversity and anhedonia amotivation. Analyses were adjusted for obesity, diet, antidepressant use, sociodemographic and technical covariates. Data were imputed using multiple imputation by chained equations. Mean age was 65.2 ± 7.6; 93% of the sample were females. We found a direct, significant, association between alpha diversity and anhedonia/amotivation ( β = −0.37; 95%CI: −0.71 to −0.03; P = 0.03). Faecal, but not serum, levels of the endocannabinoid palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) mediated this association: the indirect effect was significant ( β = −0.13; 95%CI: −0.24 to −0.01; P = 0.03), as was the total effect ( β = −0.38; 95%CI: −0.72 to −0.04; P = 0.03), whereas the direct effect of alpha diversity on anhedonia/amotivation was attenuated fully ( β = −0.25; 95%CI: −0.60 to 0.09; P = 0.16). Our results suggest that gut-microbial diversity might contribute to anhedonia/amotivation via the endocannabinoid system. These findings shed light on the biological underpinnings of anhedonia/amotivation and suggest the gut microbiota-endocannabinoid axis as a promising therapeutic target in an area of unmet clinical need.

          Related collections

          Most cited references43

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.

          In this article, we attempt to distinguish between the properties of moderator and mediator variables at a number of levels. First, we seek to make theorists and researchers aware of the importance of not using the terms moderator and mediator interchangeably by carefully elaborating, both conceptually and strategically, the many ways in which moderators and mediators differ. We then go beyond this largely pedagogical function and delineate the conceptual and strategic implications of making use of such distinctions with regard to a wide range of phenomena, including control and stress, attitudes, and personality traits. We also provide a specific compendium of analytic procedures appropriate for making the most effective use of the moderator and mediator distinction, both separately and in terms of a broader causal system that includes both moderators and mediators.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Structural absorption by barbule microstructures of super black bird of paradise feathers

            Many studies have shown how pigments and internal nanostructures generate color in nature. External surface structures can also influence appearance, such as by causing multiple scattering of light (structural absorption) to produce a velvety, super black appearance. Here we show that feathers from five species of birds of paradise (Aves: Paradisaeidae) structurally absorb incident light to produce extremely low-reflectance, super black plumages. Directional reflectance of these feathers (0.05–0.31%) approaches that of man-made ultra-absorbent materials. SEM, nano-CT, and ray-tracing simulations show that super black feathers have titled arrays of highly modified barbules, which cause more multiple scattering, resulting in more structural absorption, than normal black feathers. Super black feathers have an extreme directional reflectance bias and appear darkest when viewed from the distal direction. We hypothesize that structurally absorbing, super black plumage evolved through sensory bias to enhance the perceived brilliance of adjacent color patches during courtship display.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                amedeo.mininichino@psych.ox.ac.uk
                Journal
                Mol Psychiatry
                Mol Psychiatry
                Molecular Psychiatry
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                1359-4184
                1476-5578
                17 May 2021
                17 May 2021
                2021
                : 26
                : 11
                : 6269-6276
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, Department of Psychiatry, , University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.4991.5, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8948, Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, , University of Oxford, ; Oxford, UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.83440.3b, ISNI 0000000121901201, Department of Psychology and Human Development, UCL Institute of Education, , University College London, ; London, UK
                [4 ]GRID grid.425213.3, Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, , King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, ; London, UK
                [5 ]GRID grid.416938.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0641 5119, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, , Warneford Hospital, ; Oxford, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6309-6324
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9751-5219
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9790-0571
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4972-8786
                Article
                1147
                10.1038/s41380-021-01147-5
                8760063
                34002020
                fe7b4cc7-154e-494c-9e51-5866af503415
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 13 January 2021
                : 15 April 2021
                : 22 April 2021
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2021

                Molecular medicine
                predictive markers,depression
                Molecular medicine
                predictive markers, depression

                Comments

                Comment on this article