23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVIDiSTRESS global survey collects data on early human responses to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic from 173 429 respondents in 48 countries. The open science study was co-designed by an international consortium of researchers to investigate how psychological responses differ across countries and cultures, and how this has impacted behaviour, coping and trust in government efforts to slow the spread of the virus. Starting in March 2020, COVIDiSTRESS leveraged the convenience of unpaid online recruitment to generate public data. The objective of the present analysis is to understand relationships between psychological responses in the early months of global coronavirus restrictions and help understand how different government measures succeed or fail in changing public behaviour. There were variations between and within countries. Although Western Europeans registered as more concerned over COVID-19, more stressed, and having slightly more trust in the governments' efforts, there was no clear geographical pattern in compliance with behavioural measures. Detailed plots illustrating between-countries differences are provided. Using both traditional and Bayesian analyses, we found that individuals who worried about getting sick worked harder to protect themselves and others. However, concern about the coronavirus itself did not account for all of the variances in experienced stress during the early months of COVID-19 restrictions. More alarmingly, such stress was associated with less compliance. Further, those most concerned over the coronavirus trusted in government measures primarily where policies were strict. While concern over a disease is a source of mental distress, other factors including strictness of protective measures, social support and personal lockdown conditions must also be taken into consideration to fully appreciate the psychological impact of COVID-19 and to understand why some people fail to follow behavioural guidelines intended to protect themselves and others from infection. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 18 May 2020. Following IPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/g2t3b. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references105

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence

            Summary The December, 2019 coronavirus disease outbreak has seen many countries ask people who have potentially come into contact with the infection to isolate themselves at home or in a dedicated quarantine facility. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence. We did a Review of the psychological impact of quarantine using three electronic databases. Of 3166 papers found, 24 are included in this Review. Most reviewed studies reported negative psychological effects including post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger. Stressors included longer quarantine duration, infection fears, frustration, boredom, inadequate supplies, inadequate information, financial loss, and stigma. Some researchers have suggested long-lasting effects. In situations where quarantine is deemed necessary, officials should quarantine individuals for no longer than required, provide clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols, and ensure sufficient supplies are provided. Appeals to altruism by reminding the public about the benefits of quarantine to wider society can be favourable.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Global Measure of Perceived Stress

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                R Soc Open Sci
                RSOS
                royopensci
                Royal Society Open Science
                The Royal Society
                2054-5703
                February 10, 2021
                February 2021
                February 10, 2021
                : 8
                : 2
                : 200589
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ]School of Culture and Society (Interacting Minds Center), Aarhus University, , Aarhus, Denmark
                [ 2 ]Danish School of Education (DPU), Aarhus University, , Aarhus, Denmark
                [ 3 ]Hong Kong Institute of Education, Education University of Hong Kong, , New Territories, Hong Kong
                [ 4 ]University of Bern, , Bern, Switzerland
                [ 5 ]Educational Psychology Program, University of Alabama, , Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
                [ 6 ]Wroclaw University Institute of Psychology, , Wroclaw 50-527, Poland
                [ 7 ]Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [ 8 ]Department of European and International Studies, King's College London, , London, UK
                [ 9 ]Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, , Fort Collins, CO, USA
                [ 10 ]Peace Research Institute, International Christian University, , Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
                [ 11 ]Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, , Aarhus, Denmark
                [ 12 ]School of Psychology, Keele University, , Keele, Staffordshire, UK
                [ 13 ]School of Psychology, University of Waikato, , Wellington, New Zealand
                Author notes

                Electronic supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5291225.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0214-5791
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-2906
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7181-2565
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-1471
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6899-0520
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0914-4938
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4038-8471
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9285-2061
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0248-7065
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6227-9698
                Article
                rsos200589
                10.1098/rsos.200589
                8074580
                33972837
                ff62d613-9566-411f-9c6f-c7698d389c19
                © 2021 The Authors.

                Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : April 7, 2020
                : January 25, 2021
                Categories
                1001
                87
                205
                Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
                Registered Report

                covid-19,worry,stress,compliance behaviour,trust,social psychology

                Comments

                Comment on this article