47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain: Current Trends and Future Applications

      review-article
      * ,
      Brain Sciences
      MDPI
      spinal cord stimulation (SCS), neuromodulation, neuropathic pain

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The origin and the neural pathways involved in chronic neuropathic pain are still not extensively understood. For this reason, despite the wide variety of pain medications available on the market, neuropathic pain is challenging to treat. The present therapeutic alternative considered as the gold standard for many kinds of chronic neuropathic pain is epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Despite its proved efficacy, the favourable cost-effectiveness when compared to the long-term use of poorly effective drugs and the expanding array of indications and technical improvements, SCS is still worldwide largely neglected by general practitioners, neurologists, neurosurgeons and pain therapists, often bringing to a large delay in considering as a therapeutic option for patients affected by neuropathic chronic pain. The present state of the art of SCS in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain is here overviewed and speculations on whether to use a trial period or direct implant, to choose between percutaneous leads or paddle electrodes and on the pros and cons of the different patterns of stimulation presently available on the market (tonic stim, high-frequency stim and burst stim) are described.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Algorithm for neuropathic pain treatment: an evidence based proposal.

          New studies of the treatment of neuropathic pain have increased the need for an updated review of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to support an evidence based algorithm to treat neuropathic pain conditions. Available studies were identified using a MEDLINE and EMBASE search. One hundred and five studies were included. Numbers needed to treat (NNT) and numbers needed to harm (NNH) were used to compare efficacy and safety of the treatments in different neuropathic pain syndromes. The quality of each trial was assessed. Tricyclic antidepressants and the anticonvulsants gabapentin and pregabalin were the most frequently studied drug classes. In peripheral neuropathic pain, the lowest NNT was for tricyclic antidepressants, followed by opioids and the anticonvulsants gabapentin and pregabalin. For central neuropathic pain there is limited data. NNT and NNH are currently the best way to assess relative efficacy and safety, but the need for dichotomous data, which may have to be estimated retrospectively for old trials, and the methodological complexity of pooling data from small cross-over and large parallel group trials, remain as limitations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Dorsal root ganglion stimulation yielded higher treatment success rate for complex regional pain syndrome and causalgia at 3 and 12 months: a randomized comparative trial

            A comparative effectiveness trial indicates that dorsal root ganglion stimulation provided a higher rate of treatment success with less postural variation in paresthesia intensity compared to spinal cord stimulation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: preliminary clinical report.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Brain Sci
                Brain Sci
                brainsci
                Brain Sciences
                MDPI
                2076-3425
                24 July 2018
                August 2018
                : 8
                : 8
                : 138
                Affiliations
                Neurosurgery Department, Functional Neurosurgery, Unit for the Surgical Treatment of Pain and Spasticity, Fondazione Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20131 Milan, Italy; vincenzo.levi@ 123456unimi.it
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: ivanodones@ 123456gmail.com ; Tel.: +39-34931-81075
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2713-6357
                Article
                brainsci-08-00138
                10.3390/brainsci8080138
                6119923
                30042314
                ff7c9913-2339-4881-bdfe-13ba328d858b
                © 2018 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 30 June 2018
                : 18 July 2018
                Categories
                Review

                spinal cord stimulation (scs),neuromodulation,neuropathic pain

                Comments

                Comment on this article