3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Perioperative Outcome of Robotic Approach Versus Manual Videothoracoscopic Major Resection in Patients Affected by Early Lung Cancer: Results of a Randomized Multicentric Study (ROMAN Study)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          We report the results of the first prospective international randomized control trial to compare the perioperative outcome and surgical radicality of the robotic approach with those of traditional video-assisted surgery in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer.

          Methods

          Patients with clinical stage T1–T2, N0–N1 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) resection arms. The primary objective was the incidence of adverse events including complications and conversion to thoracotomy. The secondary objectives included extent of lymph node (LN) dissection and other indicators.

          Results

          This trial was closed at 83 cases as the probability of concluding in favor of the robot arm for the primary outcome was null according to the observed trend. In this study, we report the results of the analysis conducted on the patients enrolled until trial suspension. Thirty-nine cases were randomized in the VATS arm and 38 in the robotic arm. Six patients were excluded from analysis. Despite finding no difference between the two arms in perioperative complications, conversions, duration of surgery, or duration of postoperative stay, a significantly greater degree of LN assessment by the robotic technique was observed in regards to the median number of sampled LN stations [6, interquartile range (IQR) 4–6 vs. 4, IQR 3–5; p = 0.0002], hilar LNs (7, IQR 5–10 vs. 4, IQR 2–7; p = 0.0003), and mediastinal LNs (7, IQR 5–10 vs. 5, IQR 3–7; p = 0.0001).

          Conclusions

          The results of this trial demonstrated that RATS was not superior to VATS considering the perioperative outcome for early-stage NSCLC, but the robotic approach allowed an improvement of LN dissection. Further studies are suggested to validate the results of this trial.

          Clinical Trial Registration

          clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02804893.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer.

          The IASLC Staging and Prognostic Factors Committee has collected a new database of 94,708 cases donated from 35 sources in 16 countries around the globe. This has now been analysed by our statistical partners at Cancer Research And Biostatistics and, in close collaboration with the members of the committee proposals have been developed for the T, N, and M categories of the 8th edition of the TNM Classification for lung cancer due to be published late 2016. In this publication we describe the methods used to evaluate the resultant Stage groupings and the proposals put forward for the 8th edition.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            ESTS guidelines for intraoperative lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer.

            The European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) organized a workshop dealing with lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer. The objective of this workshop was to develop guidelines for definitions and the surgical procedures of intraoperative lymph node staging, and the pathologic evaluation of resected lymph nodes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Relevant peer-reviewed publications on the subjects, the experience of the participants, and the opinion of the ESTS members contributing on line, were used to reach a consensus. Systematic nodal dissection is recommended in all cases to ensure complete resection. Lobe-specific systematic nodal dissection is acceptable for peripheral squamous T1 tumors, if hilar and interlobar nodes are negative on frozen section studies; it implies removal of, at least, three hilar and interlobar nodes and three mediastinal nodes from three stations in which the subcarinal is always included. Selected lymph node biopsies and sampling are justified to prove nodal involvement when resection is not possible. Pathologic evaluation includes all lymph nodes resected separately and those remaining in the lung specimen. Sections are done at the site of gross abnormalities. If macroscopic inspection does not detect any abnormal site, 2-mm slices of the nodes in the longitudinal plane are recommended. Routine search for micrometastases or isolated tumor cells in hematoxylin-eosin negative nodes would be desirable. Randomized controlled trials to evaluate adjuvant therapies for patients with these conditions are recommended. The adherence to these guidelines will standardize the intraoperative lymph node staging and pathologic evaluation, and improve pathologic staging, which will help decide on the best adjuvant therapy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Complete resection in lung cancer surgery: proposed definition.

              To propose an internationally accepted definition of complete resection in lung cancer surgery. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Staging Committee created the Complete Resection Subcommittee in 2001 to work on an international definition of complete resection in lung cancer surgery. The previous definitions of complete resection and the rules of the International Union Against Cancer regarding the TNM residual tumor classification, together with a thorough review of the pertinent literature, and the input of the members of the IASLC Staging Committee were considered in order to get an international consensus on the definition of complete resection in lung cancer surgery. Complete resection requires all of the following: free resection margins proved microscopically; systematic nodal dissection or lobe-specific systematic nodal dissection; no extracapsular nodal extension of the tumor; and the highest mediastinal node removed must be negative. Whenever there is involvement of resection margins, extracapsular nodal extension, unremoved positive lymph nodes or positive pleural or pericardial effusions, the resection is defined as incomplete. When the resection margins are free and no residual tumor is left, but the resection does not fulfill the criteria for complete resection, there is carcinoma in situ at the bronchial margin or positive pleural lavage cytology, the term uncertain resection is proposed. The proposed definitions of complete, incomplete and uncertain resections are clear and reproducible in an international setting to study their prognostic impact prospectively.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                09 September 2021
                2021
                : 11
                : 726408
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute , Milan, Italy
                [2] 2Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University , Milan, Italy
                [3] 3Department of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University Hospital , Philadelphia, PA, United States
                [4] 4Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University Hospital , Philadelphia, PA, United States
                [5] 5Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute , Milan, Italy
                [6] 6Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center , Rozzano, Italy
                [7] 7Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [8] 8Thoracic Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neuro Sciences, Diagnostic Imaging, University of Siena, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese , Siena, Italy
                [9] 9Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University , Rozzano, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Alfredo Addeo, Geneva University Hospitals (HUG), Switzerland

                Reviewed by: Paul Emile Van Schil, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium; Agathe Seguin-Givelet, L’Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, France; Jari Räsänen, Helsinki University Library, Finland

                *Correspondence: Giulia Veronesi, veronesi.giulia@ 123456hsr.it

                This article was submitted to Thoracic Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2021.726408
                8458770
                34568057
                ffa588d4-6976-48c3-88bb-c54da4d267a2
                Copyright © 2021 Veronesi, Abbas, Muriana, Lembo, Bottoni, Perroni, Testori, Dieci, Bakhos, Car, Luzzi, Alloisio and Novellis

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 16 June 2021
                : 11 August 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 3, Equations: 0, References: 36, Pages: 9, Words: 5196
                Funding
                Funded by: Fondazione Umberto Veronesi 10.13039/501100004710
                Funded by: Intuitive Surgical 10.13039/100010477
                Categories
                Oncology
                Clinical Trial

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc),surgery,robotic surgery,vats,randomized study

                Comments

                Comment on this article