China’s Fiscal Policies to Solve Impact of Externalities and Environment

zhang, can; Khalid, Nur Ajrun

doi:10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PP5AJHN.v1

ScienceOpen: research and publishing network

For Publishers

For Researchers

Blog
About

Search
Advanced search

439

views

recommends

Publish your conference poster on ScienceOpen Posters to carry on the conversation.

All posters are assigned an Open Access CC BY 4.0 license, a Crossref DOI and are integrated with ORCID, ROR, FunderID and more for best discoverability.

scite_

Record: found
Abstract: found
Poster: found

Is Open Access

China’s Fiscal Policies to Solve Impact of Externalities and Environment

Published

research-article

Author(s): can zhang ¹ ^, , Nur Ajrun Khalid ²

Publication date (Electronic preprint): 25 April 2022

Journal: ScienceOpen Posters

Publisher: ScienceOpen

Keywords: Environment, Externalities, Fiscal policies, Economy

Bookmark

Abstract

Environmental pollution, resource waste, and ecological imbalance issues occur frequently in China, including air pollution, water pollution, waste disposal, land desertification and sand disasters, soil erosion, biodiversity destruction, and so on. This not only restricts our country's economic development, but also endangers the people's living standards and quality of life. Especially due to the properties of environmental resources, namely external properties, is more easily lead to market failure. Because the negative externalities of the environment have an impact on economic development and human existence, the government must improve its support for environmental protection.

Although the effect of environmental protection has increased in recent years, and China's fiscal policy on environmental protection has improved, the strength of these policies is insufficient in terms of both fund investment and policy formulation. We must strengthen environmental preservation while boosting economic development. As a result, the government's and fiscal policy's unique role in environmental protection is critical.

Content

Author and article information

Journal

Title: ScienceOpen Posters

Publisher: ScienceOpen

Publication date (Electronic preprint): 25 April 2022

Affiliations

[1 ] School of social sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia，Pinang. Malaysia.

[2 ] Political Science Department, School of social sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia，11800 Minden, Pulau Pinang. Malaysia.

Author notes

[* ]Email: nurajrun@ 123456usm.my .

Author information

can zhang https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5111-3660

Nur Ajrun Khalid https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3554-9151

Article

DOI: 10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PP5AJHN.v1

SO-VID: 206f8c3c-8f8b-41d3-9829-92cbd13db15f

License:

This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0 , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com .

History

Date received : 25 April 2022

Data availability: The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

ScienceOpen disciplines: Social & Behavioral Sciences,Public economics,Political economics

Keywords: Environment, Externalities, Fiscal policies, Economy

References

Deryugina Tatyana, Moore Frances, Tol Richard S.J.. Environmental applications of the Coase Theorem. Environmental Science & Policy. Vol. 120:81–88. 2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]
Feng Kuishuang, Hubacek Klaus, Guan Dabo, Contestabile Monica, Minx Jan, Barrett John. Distributional Effects of Climate Change Taxation: The Case of the UK. Environmental Science & Technology. Vol. 44(10):3670–3676. 2010. American Chemical Society (ACS). [Cross Ref]
Hechter Michael, Kanazawa Satoshi. SOCIOLOGICAL RATIONAL CHOICE THEORYRational Choice Sociology. p. 2–25. 2019. Edward Elgar Publishing. [Cross Ref]
Liu Xinghe, Xu Huifeng, Lu Meiting. Do auditors respond to stringent environmental regulation? Evidence from China’s new environmental protection law. Economic Modelling. Vol. 96:54–67. 2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]
Postula Marta, Radecka-Moroz Katarzyna. Fiscal policy instruments in environmental protection. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Vol. 84:2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]
Runst Petrik, Höhle David. The German eco tax and its impact on CO2 emissions. Energy Policy. Vol. 160:2022. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]
Uitto Juha I.. Evaluating the environment as a global public good. Evaluation. Vol. 22(1):108–115. 2016. SAGE Publications. [Cross Ref]
Zhang Qiang, Zheng Yixuan, Tong Dan, Shao Min, Wang Shuxiao, Zhang Yuanhang, Xu Xiangde, Wang Jinnan, He Hong, Liu Wenqing, Ding Yihui, Lei Yu, Li Junhua, Wang Zifa, Zhang Xiaoye, Wang Yuesi, Cheng Jing, Liu Yang, Shi Qinren, Yan Liu, Geng Guannan, Hong Chaopeng, Li Meng, Liu Fei, Zheng Bo, Cao Junji, Ding Aijun, Gao Jian, Fu Qingyan, Huo Juntao, Liu Baoxian, Liu Zirui, Yang Fumo, He Kebin, Hao Jiming. Drivers of improved PM <sub>2.5</sub> air quality in China from 2013 to 2017. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 116(49):24463–24469. 2019. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Cross Ref]
Zhou Caihua, Xie Hualin, Zhang Xinmin. Does Fiscal Policy Promote Third-Party Environmental Pollution Control in China? An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach. Sustainability. Vol. 11(16)2019. MDPI AG. [Cross Ref]

Comments

Comment on this article

[1] Deryugina Tatyana, Moore Frances, Tol Richard S.J.. Environmental applications of the Coase Theorem. Environmental Science & Policy. Vol. 120:81–88. 2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

[2] Feng Kuishuang, Hubacek Klaus, Guan Dabo, Contestabile Monica, Minx Jan, Barrett John. Distributional Effects of Climate Change Taxation: The Case of the UK. Environmental Science & Technology. Vol. 44(10):3670–3676. 2010. American Chemical Society (ACS). [Cross Ref]

[3] Hechter Michael, Kanazawa Satoshi. SOCIOLOGICAL RATIONAL CHOICE THEORYRational Choice Sociology. p. 2–25. 2019. Edward Elgar Publishing. [Cross Ref]

[4] Liu Xinghe, Xu Huifeng, Lu Meiting. Do auditors respond to stringent environmental regulation? Evidence from China’s new environmental protection law. Economic Modelling. Vol. 96:54–67. 2021. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

[5] Postula Marta, Radecka-Moroz Katarzyna. Fiscal policy instruments in environmental protection. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Vol. 84:2020. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

[6] Runst Petrik, Höhle David. The German eco tax and its impact on CO2 emissions. Energy Policy. Vol. 160:2022. Elsevier BV. [Cross Ref]

[7] Uitto Juha I.. Evaluating the environment as a global public good. Evaluation. Vol. 22(1):108–115. 2016. SAGE Publications. [Cross Ref]

[8] Zhang Qiang, Zheng Yixuan, Tong Dan, Shao Min, Wang Shuxiao, Zhang Yuanhang, Xu Xiangde, Wang Jinnan, He Hong, Liu Wenqing, Ding Yihui, Lei Yu, Li Junhua, Wang Zifa, Zhang Xiaoye, Wang Yuesi, Cheng Jing, Liu Yang, Shi Qinren, Yan Liu, Geng Guannan, Hong Chaopeng, Li Meng, Liu Fei, Zheng Bo, Cao Junji, Ding Aijun, Gao Jian, Fu Qingyan, Huo Juntao, Liu Baoxian, Liu Zirui, Yang Fumo, He Kebin, Hao Jiming. Drivers of improved PM <sub>2.5</sub> air quality in China from 2013 to 2017. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Vol. 116(49):24463–24469. 2019. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. [Cross Ref]

[9] Zhou Caihua, Xie Hualin, Zhang Xinmin. Does Fiscal Policy Promote Third-Party Environmental Pollution Control in China? An Evolutionary Game Theoretical Approach. Sustainability. Vol. 11(16)2019. MDPI AG. [Cross Ref]