212
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Publish your conference poster on ScienceOpen Posters to carry on the conversation.

      All posters are assigned an Open Access CC BY 4.0 license, a Crossref DOI and are integrated with ORCID, ROR, FunderID and more for best discoverability.

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Poster: found
      Is Open Access

      THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS IS A PROMISING TOOL WHEN PROCESSING DATA AND MAKING DECISIONS IN PSYCHIATRY

      Published
      research-article
        1 , , 1
      ScienceOpen Posters
      ScienceOpen
      psychiatry, hierarchy, dimensional, decision, psychometric
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Objectives . Formation of results of processing of rank (clinical, psychometric) information in the scale of relations [1] based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP, Saaty T. L., 2008). Methods . Clinical, psychometric, statistical and AHP algorithms. Results . When evaluating a patient's state, decisions must be made based on clinical, psychometric, social, and neurobiological characteristics. These characteristics correspond to measurement scales: categorical, rank (dimensional, psychometric), and relationship scales. Only the latter are numerical, so it is not possible [1] to create correct models of states taking into account neurobiological indicators. Rank estimates do not allow calculating even average values. Analysis of the problems of evaluating psychopathological states on the basis of categorical and rank scales shows that these problems can be presented in the form of appropriate hierarchies, the structure of which must be taken into account when processing initial information [1]. Therefore, the use of the AHP tools in these situations is most natural. The implementation of AHP procedures for processing rank information is based on the application of the AHP normative approach. In [1], using the simplest examples of General medical significance, the technique of using the AHP normative approach is demonstrated. In practice, both individual doctor evaluations (personalized patient management method) and average expert evaluations (team method) can be used. Conclusions . The AHP approach is promising when constructing integral models of the corresponding processes and correctly using the resulting estimates in practice and research. References. 1. Mitikhin V.G., Solokhina T.A. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry , 2019, 119(2): 49-54. doi:10.17116/jnevro201911902149

            Content

            Author and article information

            Journal
            ScienceOpen Posters
            ScienceOpen
            30 January 2021
            Affiliations
            [1 ] Mental Health Research Centre, Moscow, Russian Federations
            Author information
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9502-5395
            https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3235-2476
            Article
            10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PPLSLDL.v1
            be2c37e9-65e2-4cef-b9c4-71213524e356

            This work has been published open access under Creative Commons Attribution License CC BY 4.0 , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Conditions, terms of use and publishing policy can be found at www.scienceopen.com .

            History
            : 30 January 2021

            The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
            Medicine
            psychiatry,hierarchy,dimensional,decision,psychometric

            Comments

            Comment on this article