Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: found
Is Open Access

The avant-garde in the architecture and visual arts of Post-Revolutionary Mexico

Architecture_MPS

UCL Press

Read this article at

Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      Commenting on an exhibition of contemporary Mexican architecture in Rome in 1957, the polemic and highly influential Italian architectural critic and historian, Bruno Zevi, ridiculed Mexican modernism for combining Pre-Columbian motifs with modern architecture. He referred to it as ‘Mexican Grotesque’. Inherent in Zevi’s comments were an attitude towards modern architecture that defined it in primarily material terms; its principle role being one of “spatial and programmatic function”. Despite the weight of this Modernist tendency in the architectural circles of Post-Revolutionary Mexico, we suggest in this paper that Mexican modernism cannot be reduced to such “material” definitions. In the highly charged political context of Mexico in the first half of the 20th Century, modern architecture was perhaps above all else, a tool for propaganda.In this political atmosphere it was undesirable, indeed it was seen as impossible, to separate art, architecture and politics in a way that would be a direct reflection of Modern architecture’s European manifestations. Form was to follow function, but that function was to be communicative as well as spatial and programmatic. One consequence of this “political communicative function” in Mexico was the combination of the “mural tradition” with contemporary architectural design; what Zevi defined as “Mexican Grotesque”. In this paper, we will examine the political context of Post-Revolutionary Mexico and discuss what may be defined as its most iconic building; the Central Library at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico. In direct counterpoint to Zevi, we will suggest that it was far from grotesque, but rather was one of the most committed political statements made by the Modern Movement throughout the Twentieth Century. It was propaganda, it was political. It was utopian.

      Related collections

      Most cited references 12

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      “Interpretaciones Singulares de Visiones Colectivas: Estridentópolis.”

        Bookmark
        • Record: found
        • Abstract: not found
        • Article: not found

        “Bibliografía Analítica.”

          Bookmark
          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          “El futuro radiante: la Ciudad Universitaria.”

            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Affiliations
            Faculty of Architecture, University of Veracruz, Mexico
            Contributors
            Journal
            Amps
            Architecture_MPS
            UCL Press
            2050-9006
            November 2012
            : 1
            : 1
            10.14324/111.444.amps.2012v1i3.001
            Copyright © 2012 The Author(s)

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

            Counts
            Figures: 5, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 25, Pages: 19

            Comments

            Comment on this article