500
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    4
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Thin or Thick Inclusiveness? The Constitutional Duty to Consult and Accommodate First Nations in Canada

      review-article

      1 , *

      London Journal of Canadian Studies

      UCL Press

      aboriginal rights, Canadian constitution, duty to consult, oil sands, tar sands, indigenous

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          What has the addition of aboriginal rights to the Canadian constitution in 1982 meant for the place of First Nations’ interests in the Canadian constitutional order? This article considers this question in the context of natural resource exploitation – specifically, the exploitation of the oil or tar sands in Alberta. It details some of the leading jurisprudence surrounding Section 35 of the Constitution Act 1982, the section of the Constitution recognizing existing aboriginal and treaty rights. Arguably, Section 35 represented an important effort to improve the status of aboriginal peoples in Canada, to enhance the extent to which Canada included and respected the values and interests of First Nations. The article specifically considers how the judicial interpretation of the Crown’s duty to consult and accommodate aboriginal peoples is related to the theme of inclusivity. It argues that the general thrust of judicial interpretation has promoted a thin, or procedural, version of inclusiveness rather than a substantive, or thicker, one. Such a thicker version of inclusiveness would be one in which the pace of oil sands exploitation is moderated or halted in order to allow First Nations to engage in traditional activities connected intimately with aboriginal and treaty rights.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Crown Consultation with Aboriginal Peoples in Oil Sands Development: Is it Adequate, Is it Legal? (CIRL Occasional Paper #19)Constitutional Forum/forum constitutionnel

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Book: not found

            Osler Updates

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              And No One Cheered: Federalism, Democracy and the Constitution Act

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                LJCS
                London Journal of Canadian Studies
                UCL Press
                2397-0928
                14 November 2019
                : 34
                : 1
                : 149-175
                Affiliations
                [1 ] University of Alberta, Canada
                [* ] Correspondence: Ian.Urquhart@ 123456UAlberta.ca
                Article
                10.14324/111.444.ljcs.2019v34.008
                Copyright © 2019, Ian Urquhart

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 19, Pages: 12

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Similar content 27

                Most referenced authors 10