2,501
views
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    4
    shares
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Prognosis and treatment of complications associated with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      review-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been estimated to have claimed more than 6 million lives, and most deaths have been attributed to complications non-specific to the virus. Therefore, understanding and treating these complications are imperative. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed 181 studies published in early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. We presented that the complications with high incidence among all COVID-19 cases were acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS, 18.52%), respiratory failure (16.54%), liver injury (14.13%) and multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS, 13.62%). Among patients who died, the most common complications were ARDS (84.10%), respiratory failure (78.75%) and respiratory injury (75.72%). Subsequently, we analyzed the risk factors for complications, and reviewed the currently available therapies according to complications and prognosis. To decrease the prevalence of COVID-19 complications and mortality, healthcare workers and patients should pay greater attention to the complications identified herein, particularly those occurring preclinically.

            Main article text

            1. INTRODUCTION

            In December 2019, the city of Wuhan, China, provided numerous reports of an outbreak of pneumonia cases due to unexplained causes. These cases garnered substantial attention in China and other countries. Subsequently, the virus was identified as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the related disease was named COVID-19. The World Health Organization declared the outbreak a global health emergency, which became a matter of worldwide concern by January 2020.

            With the increasing number of confirmed cases each day, the economic and societal effects of COVID-19 have been immense, and the lack of specific tools to combat the SARS-CoV-2 virus has become apparent. Currently, overall COVID-19 diagnosis requires a combination of medical history, medical examination, potential extrapulmonary manifestations, and laboratory and radiologic data [1], because a sole examination can identify carriers but not symptomatic individuals; consequently the definition of asymptomatic individuals was doubted that they were just found before and after expressing the already known symptoms, and it is idealistic for a rational asymptomatic COVID-19 patient to exist in reality [2]. Some countries, such as America and Greece, have introduced rapid testing for autodiagnosis purposes to avoid cross-infection during the COVID-19 pandemic [3]. Beyond self-diagnosis, massive rapid-antigen-testing strategies have been used in the general population in several countries, and have certain advantages including shorter turnaround times and lower costs [4, 5]. However, every available assay targeting SARS-CoV-2 potentially yields both false-positive and false-negative results, thus placing patients, the general public and healthcare workers, particularly emergency physicians, at risk of infection [6]. Emergency departments have made great efforts in well-timed triage and risk stratification during this novel and unexpected pandemic [7]. Nonetheless, the worldwide death rate, as reported in late March 2022, has reached 6,050,018, and most deaths have been attributed to complications associated with COVID-19. Therefore, understanding and treating these complications are of utmost importance.

            SARS-CoV-2 is an enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus belonging to the B beta coronavirus lineage and the sarbecovirus subgenus [8, 9]. To date, SARS-CoV-2 is the seventh coronavirus known to be pathogenic to humans. The first four coronaviruses, 229E, OC43, NL63 and HKU1, caused simple common-cold symptoms [10]. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) was identified in 2002–2003 in China, and the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) was identified in 2012–2013 in Saudi Arabia. Both showed strong infectivity and caused high mortality, thus substantially affecting human health and life. Several similarities have been described among SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, particularly regarding their complications.

            Although only 2 years have passed since the initial outbreak of COVID-19, numerous studies have been published in medical journals. These immense scientific efforts have been aimed at understanding SARS-CoV-2 by elucidating its evolution, epidemiology and genome. Clinically, healthcare workers have aimed to present laboratory and imaging findings, as well as available treatments for COVID-19. To our knowledge, this study is the first meta-analysis attempting to summarize the complications, including their prognosis and treatment, arising from COVID-19. We aim to present the incidence rates of the main complications in adult patients, and summarize the therapies that have been used to prevent and treat these complications. This review is intended to provide a single source compiling the vast currently available information, to offer a useful tool for researchers and healthcare workers battling against COVID-19.

            2. METHODS

            We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

            2.1. Search strategy

            References were identified through searching of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of science, medRxiv, bioRxiv and SSRN electronic databases without language restrictions. The search was performed by using various combinations of the keywords coronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, 2019-nCoV and Wuhan coronavirus.

            2.2. Inclusion

            All original studies reporting clinical complications between December 1, 2019 and May 21, 2021 were included in our meta-analysis. All included studies were screened independently by three reviewers.

            2.3. Exclusion

            Case reports and series with sample sizes below five were excluded. Studies reporting isolated complications or those in which patients with COVID-19 underwent surgical intervention during COVID-19 diagnosis or treatment were also excluded.

            2.4. Data analysis

            A single-arm meta-analysis was performed in Stata software. The original data from the included studies were first subjected to double-arcsine transformation to conform more closely to a normal distribution, then analyzed in Stata. The initial data from the meta-analysis were transformed with the formula (P = (sin(tp/2))2) to attain the final data. To objectively analyze the publication bias in the included studies, we performed the Egger test. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate the existence of publication bias.

            3. COMPLICATIONS

            3.1. Complications and their distribution

            The first identified complication of COVID-19 was pneumonia. As the virus spread globally, it was reported to damage multiple organs, including the heart, liver and kidneys ( Figure 1 ). These complications have resulted in severe morbidity and high mortality. Notably, some complications, such as hospital-acquired infections (hospital-acquired pneumonia and urinary-tract infections), pressure ulcers and deep vein thrombosis, can occur in any COVID-19 inpatients, and standard-practice preventive measures and treatment are recommended.

            Figure 1 |

            Complications associated with COVID-19.

            ACE2: angiotensin-converting enzyme, ARDS: acute respiratory distress syndrome, AKI: acute kidney injury, DIC: disseminated intravascular coagulation.

            Several severe complications are commonly seen in COVID-19, including breathing difficulty in patients with ARDS or acute respiratory injury; chest tightness or pain in patients with acute cardiac injury; high creatinine, urea nitrogen or proteinuria levels in patients with acute kidney injury (AKI); and elevated AST or ALT in patients with liver injury [11, 12]. Guillain-Barré syndrome may also occur, but the incidence is very low [13]. Complications specific to pregnant women with COVID-19 include fetal distress, premature rupture of the membrane and miscarriage [14, 15]. Furthermore, given that SARS-CoV-2 may be present in the semen of COVID-19 patients and recovering patients, it may cause complications associated with reproduction, such as infertility or poor fetal growth [16]. Additionally, psychological effects, including anxiety, depression and suicide, should also be considered.

            According to our meta-analysis (supplemental materials), among the common complications in patients with COVID-19, the incidence of ARDS was 18.52%, that of respiratory failure was 16.54%, and that of liver injury was 14.13% in all patients ( Figure 2 ). In the patients who died, the incidence of ARDS was 84.10%, that of respiratory injury was 78.75%, and that of respiratory failure was 75.72% ( Figure 2 ), thus suggesting that most patients with COVID-19 may die because of respiratory compromise. A clear difference between severe cases and non-severe cases was observed for some complications ( Figure 3 ).

            Figure 2 |

            Incidence of complications associated with COVID-19 in the entire patient cohort and in patients who died.

            Blanks (i.e., hypoproteinemia and rhabdomyolysis) indicate few or no cases reported. GIB: gastrointestinal bleeding, MOD: multiple-organ damage.

            Figure 3 |

            Differences in a selection of complications between severe and non-severe cases.

            Severe cases were defined as those in patients who were critically ill during hospitalization. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, ***P < 0.00001.

            3.2. Complications and pathogenesis

            SARS-CoV-2 targets cells through the its receptor-binding domain in the S1 subunit of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, which binds the receptor angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) [17]. Subsequently, the viral particle enters the host cells through receptor-mediated endocytosis. In the target cells, the viral genome replicates. Several studies have identified that ACE2 is mainly expressed in lung type II alveolar epithelial cells (AT2); liver cholangiocytes; esophageal keratinocytes; ileal, rectal and stomach epithelial cells; kidney proximal tubules; and endothelial cells from small and large arteries and veins in many tissues (including the lung, stomach, small intestine, bone marrow, spleen, liver, kidney and brain) [16, 18]. These findings suggest that complications may be associated with the distribution of ACE2. Another study has indicated that ACE2 is expressed abundantly in endothelial cells, particularly in cardiac pericytes, and thus COVID-19 can be considered a vascular disease rather than a respiratory disease [19]. Overall, These evidence has demonstrated that SARS-CoV-2 has the potential to affect multiple organs and systems.

            4. PREVENTION OF COMPLICATIONS

            4.1. Prevention of infection

            The first step in minimizing the effects of COVID-19 is limiting infection spread. COVID-19 is extremely transmissible, with a reported reproduction number (R0) of approximately 3 [20, 21]. Because each person infected with COVID-19 has the potential to infect approximately three others, protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection plays a crucial role in decreasing the incidence of the disease.

            Education campaigns should be conducted to promote precautions among the population at large, including frequent handwashing with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, or using an alcohol-based hand sanitizer; cough etiquette to cover coughs or sneezes with a tissue; and avoiding touching high-risk sites, specifically the eyes, nose and mouth, with unwashed hands. Additionally, the frequency of social gatherings must be decreased, and the use of personal protective equipment, such as masks, must be advocated when visiting public places. The general public should be encouraged to proactively report fever and other suspicious symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection, particularly if they had a travel history to epidemic areas, or close contact with people with confirmed or suspected cases [22].

            Healthcare workers, particularly those at the frontlines, are at high risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and hence must receive updated training on infection prevention and control. They must also be provided with adequate personal protective equipment, including surgical masks, disposable medical protective clothing and latex gloves [23]. Additionally, shift hours should be strictly controlled, and adequate rest, food and family support should be provided to avoid overwork. Moreover, studies during the COVID-19 pandemic have suggested that mental-health problems, including depression, anxiety and insomnia, are prevalent in a considerable proportion of healthcare workers, particularly nurses [24, 25]. Therefore, mental-health support is necessary for healthcare workers, particularly these exposed to COVID-19. Given that some reports have stated that the virus can persist on plastic and stainless-steel surfaces for as long as 72 hours [26], efficient disinfection of wards and medical waste is also key to infection prevention. Particular attention should be paid to bathrooms and soiled objects, because of possible transmission via the fecal route [27, 28].

            At the governmental level, provision of information should be rapid and transparent, through the establishment of a daily press-release system. Medical institutions should follow integrated control measures, including patient isolation, contact tracing, quarantine and vaccination. Notably, some cases in the pre-symptomatic or post-symptomatic stages, or cases with paucisymptomatic COVID-19, are able to transmit the virus [29]. Thus, social distancing and mask-wearing were recommended or mandatory for the public during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social-distancing strategies, such as closing cinemas and restaurants, cancelling large public gatherings, and restricting and closely monitoring travel, have been demonstrated to be effective in China and other countries. Moreover, safe mask-wearing should also be recommended during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current studies have demonstrated that FFP/(K) N95 masks are an effective measure to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission and result in fewer respiratory adverse effects (such as cough, dyspnea and sputum production) than medical/surgical masks, whereas cotton cloth masks not only do not prevent infection but also are more likely to cause respiratory adverse effects [30]. A vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 is one of the most effective ways to prevent the spread of the virus, and thus vaccination of the public, particularly high-risk individuals, should be encouraged. However, the response to COVID-19 vaccination has varied among populations. For example, women and younger people are more likely to be vaccinated against COVID-19, whereas men with a basic education level and older people tend to be more hesitant to vaccinate against COVID-19 [31]. Furthermore, for both SARS and SARS-CoV-2, animal-to-human transmission is suspected to have caused the initial stage of the epidemic; therefore, all game-meat trading should be strictly regulated to terminate this route of transmission [32].

            4.2. Screening causes of complications

            In our review, we identified five main mechanisms leading to complications:

            1. SARS-CoV-2 directly infects target organs or cells expressing the ACE2 receptor. Viral inclusions have been observed in lung cells [33], and viral particles have been found in bronchial and type II alveolar epithelial cells through electron microscopy.

            2. An inflammatory cytokine storm produced by the immune response against the virus results in organ or systemic damage. Greater disease severity is associated with higher plasma levels of IL-2, IL-7, IL-10, GSCF, IP10, MCP1, MIP1A and TNF-α [12]. Another study has found that tocilizumab, an IL-6-receptor inhibitor, is efficient in treating severe COVID-19 [34].

            3. Drug-induced complications ( Table 1 ). Treatments such as lopinavir-ritonavir, an antiviral drug, may result in gastrointestinal adverse effects and hepatotoxicity [43, 44].

            4. Complication chain reaction. COVID-19 patients with ARDS are predisposed to developing other complications, including AKI, acute cardiac injury or acute liver injury [54].

            5. Deterioration of pre-existing comorbidities.

            6. Simultaneous contribution of these mechanisms to the occurrence of clinical complications. This mechanism is the most likely scenario.

            Table 1 |

            Efficacy and risks of common drugs used to treat patients with COVID-19

            DrugsEfficacyRisks
            Remdesivir (nucleotide analog)Superior antiviral activity to lopinavir-ritonavir in mice with MERS-CoV infection [35], and effective inhibition of SARS-CoV-2, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV in vitro [36] have been reported. Adults with severe COVID-19 have not been found to benefit from remdesivir in a randomized trial [37], whereas adults with COVID-19 receiving intravenous remdesivir have shown shorter times to recovery in a double-blind trial [38].No published safety data are available for SARS-CoV-2. One of 175 Ebola-infected patients after remdesivir administration experienced hypotension followed by cardiac arrest in a randomized trial [39].
            Lopinavir-ritonavir (protease inhibitor)No benefit was observed with lopinavir-ritonavir compared with standard care in hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 in an open-label RCT [40]. However, efficacy has been observed in patients with SARS-CoV [41] but has been found to be unclear in patients with MERS-CoV [42].Common gastrointestinal adverse effects include diarrhea, nausea and vomiting [40, 43]. Hepatotoxicity (elevated transaminases) and elevated odds of liver injury have been reported [44].
            Chloroquine (antimalarial)Effective antiviral activity against SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 has been reported in vitro [36, 45]. Effective inhibition of the exacerbation of pneumonia and shorter disease course have been observed [46].No published safety data are available for SARS-CoV-2, but some concerns include the possibility of QT prolongation, hypoglycemia, neuropsychiatric effects, retinopathy [47] and cardiovascular disorders (including ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure, pulmonary arterial hypertension and valvular dysfunction) [48, 49].
            Hydroxychloroquine (antimalarial)Enhanced viral clearance and decreased disease progression have been found in patients with COVID-19, particularly with administration of hydroxychloroquine in combination with azithromycin, in an open-label non-RCT [50]. This treatment is more effective than chloroquine in inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 in vitro [51]. For patients with COVID-19, hydroxychloroquine has not been associated with a decreased risk of death in an observational study [52].No published safety data are available for SARS-CoV-2, but concerns include the possibility of QT prolongation, hypoglycemia, neuropsychiatric effects, retinopathy [47] and cardiovascular disorders (including ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure, pulmonary arterial hypertension and valvular dysfunction) [48, 49].
            Corticosteroids (immunostimulators)Proper use of corticosteroids has been found to decrease mortality and shorten the length of hospital stay for critically ill patients with SARS in a retrospective study of 401 patients [53]. In SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with ARDS, treatment with methylprednisolone has been found to decrease the risk of death in a prospective cohort study [54]. No clinical data for mild cases are available.No published safety data are available for SARS-CoV-2, but diabetes and avascular necrosis in patients with SARS [55, 56], and secondary bacterial or fungal infection in influenza have been reported [57].
            Ribavirin (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase inhibitor)High concentrations inhibit SARS-CoV replication in vitro [58]. When used alone or in combination with interferons, no discernible effect on clinical outcomes or viral clearance has been observed in patients with MERS [59, 60]. No data are available on the efficacy of Ribavirin in the treatment of COVID-19.No published safety data are available for SARS-CoV-2. High proportions of hemolytic anemia and liver toxicity have been reported in a SARS trial [58].
            4.3. Recognizing preclinical complications

            A retrospective cohort study has indicated that the median time from disease onset to death is 18.5 days, whereas the shortest survival duration from illness onset to death is 15 days, suggesting that COVID-19 progresses rapidly [61]. Given that COVID-19 complications are the leading cause of death, identifying the warning signs of these complications and taking proper measures might slow or halt the progression of COVID-19 and minimize the risk of mortality. Regular monitor of risk factors or signs ( Table 2 ) associated with the pathogenesis and development of COVID-19 complications is recommended, particularly in people with pre-existing complications as well as in high-risk population groups, such as older people with comorbidities. The heavy burden of smoking and obesity, and the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases in modern society have placed people at risk of severe COVID-19 with complications [62]. In addition, close attention should be paid to pregnant women with COVID-19, although current evidence suggests that no serious complications occur in pregnant patients, and their outcomes are favorable [14, 63].

            Table 2 |

            Common complications associated with COVID-19

            Complications associated with COVID-19When to be alert
            ARDSAll COVID-19 patients
            Acute respiratory injuryAll COVID-19 patients
            Respiratory failureCOVID-19 patients with respiratory injury
            Acute cardiac injuryCOVID-19 patients with chest discomfort and palpitations
            ArrhythmiaAll COVID-19 patients, particularly those treated with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine
            Heart failureSevere COVID-19 patients or those treated with chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine
            ShockCOVID-19 patients with cold extremities or weak peripheral pulses
            SepsisCOVID-19 patients with SARS-CoV-2 viremia
            DICCOVID-19 patients with elevated D-dimer levels
            CoagulopathyCOVID-19 patients with abnormal coagulation parameters
            Liver injury or liver-function abnormalitiesAll COVID-19 patients, particularly those treated with ribavirin or lopinavir-ritonavir
            AKIAll COVID-19 patients, particularly those taking nephrotoxicity inducing drugs (e.g., NSAIDs or vancomycin)
            Renal failureCOVID-19 patients with acute kidney injury
            Multiple-organ failureSevere COVID-19 patients, particularly those with DIC

            Most of these complications can occur in any patient with COVID-19. However, the second column highlights when complications are most likely to occur and/or when healthcare professionals should be most alert.

            The effects of COVID-19 on mental health should not be discounted. Anxiety and depression have frequently been observed in patients with COVID-19, and some reports have indicated that suicidal risk may increase due to social isolation and separation from families [64]. Consequently, hospital staff should specifically ask whether patients are experiencing such symptoms, and should pay particular attention to patients with limited communication abilities and those in intensive care units (ICUs). Adequate recognition and treatment of psychological symptoms at early stages are crucial, because such symptoms can greatly influence patients’ well-being.

            5. TREATMENT OF COMPLICATIONS

            5.1. Facility planning

            Patient isolation is important to prevent nosocomial disease transmission, and protect the public and healthcare workers. For successful isolation, hospitals must be equipped with a suitable infrastructure. Patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 should be admitted to an airborne-infection isolation room with negative pressure relative to the surrounding areas, and equipped with accessible sinks, alcohol-hand-sanitizer dispensers and suite bathrooms. Patients with confirmed COVID-19 should be admitted to single rooms with negative pressure to prevent cross-infection within hospitals. However, rooms with negative pressure may place patients at risk of adverse effects because of the mental and psychological pressures of being in isolation; therefore, this aspect should also be considered. Furthermore, airborne-infection isolation rooms and hospital beds may be unavailable during outbreaks with high numbers of COVID-19 cases. To counteract this shortage, shelter hospitals in China, for example, have been created by modifying public venues [65], and might be a major reason for the successful control of COVID-19 in the early stages the pandemic in China.

            According to many reports, shared wards accommodating only patients with COVID-19 can serve as an alternative. However, current evidence indicates that COVID-19 spreads mainly through airborne and direct-contact transmission; therefore, nosocomial transmission in shared wards may occur through aerosol generation, such as by coughing or sneezing. Thus, room ventilation, open space, sanitization of protective apparel, and proper use and disinfection of bathroom areas should be considered [66].

            5.2. Triage of COVID-19 patients with complications

            Although triage of COVID-19 patients with complications is an ethically complex issue, it has the potential to ensure optimal use of medical resources and maximize the number of lives saved per available resource. Difficult decisions regarding which patients should be admitted to ICU arise in situations in which medical resources are limited, and should be made according to the principles of equity and preservation of as many lives as possible [67]. For example, COVID-19 patients with ARDS or respiratory failure require mechanical ventilation; patients with shock (septic or cardiogenic), AKI or renal failure require continuous dialysis; and patients with multiple-organ failure require ICU admission [68]. When resources are scarce, the patients benefiting most from ICU admission are considered a priority. To improve triage efficacy, policies should be implemented by trained clinicians, particularly experienced physicians [69].

            Patients who require ICU care, compared with those who do not, tend to be older, to have comorbidities, and to show higher incidence of complications and more rapidly progressing trajectories [70]. In ARDS, old age is a significant risk factor for condition development and mortality [54], suggesting that older patients with ARDS would benefit more from ICU admission than younger patients. Triage should also be based on laboratory examinations, including D-dimer and C-reactive protein concentrations and lymphocyte counts.

            5.3. Treatment of ARDS

            ARDS is a clinical syndrome characterized by severe acute hypoxemia and inflammatory pulmonary edema, which finally leads to respiratory failure—a life-threatening complication in patients with COVID-19. In a report, 38 of 81 patients (approximately 47%) infected with SARS-CoV-2 died of respiratory failure, a leading cause of fatality [71]. Thus, effective treatment for ARDS might significantly improve the clinical outcomes of patients with severe COVID-19 ( Table 3 ).

            Table 3 |

            Therapeutic options and risks for ARDS associated with COVID-19

            TherapyImplementationRisks
            Decreased tidal volumes4–8 ml/kg of PBW, initial tidal volume of 6 ml/kg PBWHigh tidal volume might result in ventilator-induced lung injury [72].
            Inspiratory pressuresPlateau pressure <30 cm H2ONo clinical data are available.
            HFNC or non-invasive ventilationMight decrease or prevent the need for tracheal intubation without affecting mortalityNo clinical data are available.
            PEERModerate or high levels of PEEP for moderate or severe ARDSRisks include barotrauma, hypotension and cardiac arrhythmias [73].
            Neuromuscular blockadedecresing the work of breathing and patient-ventilator dyssynchrony, and improving oxygenationDeep sedation is required and can cause residual paresis.
            Inhaled pulmonary vasodilatorsProstaglandins and nitric oxide (NO) were commonly used, and NO at 5–20 parts per million was recommendedNO may be associated with heart failure and cardiopulmonary compromise [73].
            CorticosteroidsRecommended for severe ARDSRisks include hyperglycemia and neuromuscular weakness [74].
            Renal replacement therapyFor oliguric renal failure, acid-base management and negative fluid balanceRisks include vascular-access complications, infection and electrolyte abnormalities.
            High-frequency oscillatory ventilationNot routinely recommended for moderate or severe ARDSThis treatment might increase mortality [75].
            Recruitment maneuversLittle valueRisks include hypotension, desaturation, decreased cardiac output, arrhythmias and pneumothorax.
            AntibioticsFor possible concomitant bacterial infectionThis treatment might result in dysbacteriosis.
            Conservative intravenous fluid managementNegative fluid balance of 0.5–1.0 L per dayNo clinical data are available.
            ECMOAccording to EOLIA trial criteriaRisks include thrombosis and hemorrhage, thrombocytopenia, altered medication pharmacokinetics, and infection and vascular-access complications [76, 77].

            The initial recommended treatment for ARDS in the context of COVID-19 is supportive care, including high-flow nasal oxygen, lung-protective ventilation strategies, conservative intravenous fluid treatment for patients without shock, empirical early antibiotics for possible infection, periodic prone positioning and consideration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [78]. For early ARDS, termed type L with high compliance, larger tidal volumes (7–8 ml/kg of predicted body weight) are recommended to help prevent reabsorption atelectasis and hypercapnia with primary non-invasive options such as high-flow nasal cannulation (HFNC) [79]. HFNC effectively improves oxygenation and decreases or eliminates the need for tracheal intubation without affecting mortality [80]. Lower positive end-expiratory pressure (PEER; 8–10 cm H2O) is considered appropriate, because higher PEER might accentuate the stress on highly permeable microvessels and compromise CO2 exchange.

            The condition of type L patients might remain unchanged, and then improve or worsen. If worsening occurs, heightened lung edema is observed, thereby decreasing the gas volume in the lung. Thus, patients might progressively undergo a transition from type L to type H with high elastance [79]. For patients with type H (severe ARDS) who may require endotracheal intubation, tidal volumes (4–8 ml/kg of predicted body weight), inspiratory pressures (plateau pressure <30 cm H2O) and high PEER are the major lung-protective ventilation strategies [73, 78]. Adjusting PEER according to transpulmonary pressures measured with an esophageal balloon is considered to be good practice to protect lung injury. Conservative intravenous fluid strategies are crucial to alleviate pulmonary edema. A negative fluid balance of 0.5–1.0 L per day in patients with ARDS without shock is recommended [81]. If shock is present in patients with ARDS, particularly those with coexisting AKI and oliguria, renal replacement therapy is recommended to maintain fluid balance. Risks, such as vascular-access complications, infection and electrolyte abnormalities, should be considered [73]. Given that the initial outbreak of COVID-19 occurred during influenza season [12, 61], empirical antibiotics should be used to prevent secondary infection. For patients with refractory hypoxemia and elevated plateau airway pressures or a need for ventilator synchrony, neuromuscular blockade with cisatracurium is an option. Inhaled 5–20 NO or inhaled prostaglandins in combination with prone positioning are the alternatives, particularly for patients with concomitant right heart failure [73]. Prone positioning is considered a first-line-treatment adjunct, and more than 12 hours per day for patients with severe ARDS in the absence of specific contraindications is recommended. In addition, a recent study has suggested that convalescent serum or plasma is a promising therapy for viral neutralization and immunomodulation in cases of severe ARDS [82]. Corticosteroids might be harmful in mild cases, but methylprednisolone has been demonstrated to be beneficial in COVID-19 patients with ARDS [54]. Some evidence suggests that high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and recruitment maneuvers have little value and are not routinely recommended. Finally, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) might serve as a last line of defense against severe ARDS or respiratory failure, and its use should follow the EOLIA trial findings [83].

            5.4. Treatment of other major systemic complications

            Patients with COVID-19 in addition to ARDS may exhibit acute liver injury, acute cardiac injury and AKI. These complications have high incidence after ARDS. Without intervention, these patients might develop multiple-organ failure, which is associated with high mortality.

            Mild liver injury in patients with COVID-19 is usually transient, and liver laboratory-test levels and function could return to normal without any interventions beyond supportive care and regular monitor of liver biochemistry [84]. Reported cases of severe liver injury, acute liver failure or acute exacerbation of chronic liver failure are rare in patients with COVID-19 [12, 85]. Recognizing the etiology is key to treatment. First, the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection may mediate injury [86]. Second, SARS-CoV-2 replicating within hepatocytes may induce direct cytotoxicity, resulting in liver damage. Third, patients with pre-existing chronic liver disease are more likely to experience hepatic injury from SARS-CoV-2 infection. Finally, anoxia and drug-induced liver injury is frequently observed in patients with COVID-19, particularly in severe cases. Liver injury may result from a combination of the aforementioned factors.

            COVID-19 patients with cardiac injury should first be examined for underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD) including hypertension, coronary heart disease and cardiomyopathy, because the mortality in COVID-19 patients with CVD is four times higher than that in all patients with COVID-19 [87]. The key to treating COVID-19 patients with cardiac injury or CVD is providing symptomatic management and supportive care. Some cases with refractory shock or ventricular arrhythmias due to cardiac injury may require mechanical support, because successful recovery has been observed with the use of ECMO [88]. Notably, increasing evidence indicates that disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) can escalate organ damage, particularly within the cardiovascular system; hence, anticoagulation should be considered. Furthermore, assessing pre-load responsiveness before fluid administration is essential. Particular attention must be paid to cardiac injury induced by certain drugs.

            Advanced age, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, shock or use of nephrotoxic drugs in COVID-19 patients with AKI are considered high-risk factors [89]. If possible, removing modifiable risk factors, such as improving shock, or decreasing or stopping the use of nephrotoxic drugs, is crucial. Symptomatic and supportive treatment could decrease the incidence of complications caused by AKI to some extent, including acid-base or electrolyte imbalances, and perturbed internal physiology. Additionally, continuous renal replacement therapy is recommended in patients with stage 2 or 3 AKI [90] as early as possible, particularly in patients with severe cytokine storm and multiple-organ failure [91].

            6. PROGNOSIS

            6.1. Risk stratification

            Patients with COVID-19 are clustered into three groups according to mild (81%), severe (14%) and critical (5%) disease severity [92]. However, the distribution might change as the pandemic continues. Pregnant women generally tend to have milder illness and better prognosis [14, 63]. The factors influencing patient prognosis are numerous and complex, but age appears to be the most significant factor. For example, the current overall case-fatally rate (CFR) of COVID-19 in China has been reported to be 2.3%, but in people 70–79 years of age, the CFR is 8.0%, whereas people with 80 years of age or older have a CFR of 14.8% [93]. A higher CFR has been observed in some Western countries because of relatively larger aging populations: the US has a CFR of 5.8%, and Europe has a CFR of 8.5% [93].

            COVID-19 complications are directly associated with patient prognosis. Older age and comorbidities may contribute to the progression of complications. For example, a cohort study has identified that ARDS is an independent risk factor for mortality, and older age additionally promotes the development of ARDS and the progression from ARDS to death [54]. AKI is corelated with higher mortality risk in patients with COVID-19, in a severity-dependent manner. Specifically, patients with stage 3 AKI show a quadrupled excess risk of death compared with patients without AKI [94]. Notably, soluble urokinase receptor levels, independently of biomarkers of kidney function and inflammation, are strongly correlated with incident AKI and are predictive of whether patients require dialysis [95]. Similarly, cardiac injury in patients with COVID-19 is associated with a higher risk of death, and patients with cardiac injury are more prone to experiencing other complications, including ARDS, AKI and liver injury [44]. Furthermore, patients with liver injury have a nine-fold greater risk of developing severe ARDS than those without liver injury [44]. Finally, coagulopathy, sepsis, respiratory failure and heart failure are also important contributors to high mortality.

            6.2. Prognosis predictors

            Patients with certain characteristics and medical history have poorer prognosis. Therefore, COVID-19 prognosis might viably be predicted by screening for such predictors. Predictors of poor prognosis are old age, male sex, smoking history, and comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, chronic pulmonary disease and cerebrovascular disease [96]. High CFR is observed in patients with cardiovascular disease (10.5%), diabetes (7.3%), chronic respiratory disease (6.3%), hypertension (6.0%) and cancer (5.6%) [87]. In terms of laboratory predictors, elevated LDH, CRP, D-dimer and lymphopenia are associated with higher death rates [61, 97]. In addition, the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) scoring systems are often used to assess the prognosis and severity of COVID-19. Higher SOFA or qSOFA scores correlate with higher mortality rates [61].

            7. CONCLUSIONS

            COVID-19 has become a major global public-health crisis, having already caused 6 million deaths worldwide, most resulting from well-understood complications. Screening and managing such complications, particularly in older male patients with comorbidities, are effective intervention tactic with the potential to decrease mortality. Currently, the primary goal should be to protect the population from SARS-CoV-2 infection. If infection does occur and complications ensue, the next-best step is optimal treatment of such complications. However, treatments are currently limited to non-specific antiviral agents and supportive care; therefore, effective drugs with powerful antiviral activity and low toxicity are urgently needed. On the basis of the Chinese experience, when novel infectious diseases occur in specific regions, the local government’s public-health measures are crucial for controlling and limiting disease spread to other areas.

            Supplementary Material

            Supplementary Material can be downloaded here

            CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

            All authors declare that there are no competing interests.

            AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

            Xudong Xie, Liangcong Hu and Hang Xue proposed the research questions, developed the protocol and drafted the manuscript. Xudong Xie, Yuan Xiong and Lang Chen refined the search strategy. Xudong Xie, Ze Lin and Chenchen Yan searched for and collected the studies. Bobin Mi, Wu Zhou and Guohui Liu assessed the risk of bias in the eligible studies. Adriana C. Panayi, Bobin Mi, Wu Zhou and Guohui Liu critically reviewed the manuscript for relevant intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

            FUNDING

            This work was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation of China (grant No. 81772345), National Key Research & Development Program of China (grant Nos. 2018YF2001502 and 2018YFB1105705), Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau (grant No. 2017060201010192), the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China (grant Nos. ZX-01-018 and ZX-01-C2016153) and the Health Commission of Hubei Province (grant No. WJ2019Z009).

            REFERENCES

            1. Mouliou DS, Pantazopoulos I, Gourgoulianis KI. COVID-19 Smart Diagnosis in the Emergency Department: All-in In Practice. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. 2022. 1–10. [Cross Ref]

            2. Mouliou DS, Gourgoulianis KI. COVID-19 ‘Asymptomatic’ Patients: An Old Wives’ Tale. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. 2022. 1–9. [Cross Ref]

            3. Mouliou DS, Pantazopoulos I, Gourgoulianis KI. Societal Criticism Towards COVID-19: Assessing the Theory of Self-Diagnosis Contrasted to Medical Diagnosis. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2021. Vol. 11(10):1777

            4. Kotsiou OS, Pantazopoulos I, Papagiannis D, Fradelos EC, Kanellopoulos N, Siachpazidou D, et al.. Repeated Antigen-Based Rapid Diagnostic Testing for Estimating the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Prevalence from the Perspective of the Workers’ Vulnerability Before and During the Lockdown. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021. Vol. 18(4):1638

            5. Mouliou DS, Pantazopoulos I, Gourgoulianis K. COVID-19 Diagnosis in the Emergency Department: Seeing the Tree but Losing the Forest. Emergency Medicine Journal – EMJ. 2022. [Cross Ref]

            6. Mouliou DS, Gourgoulianis KI. False-Positive and False-negative COVID-19 Cases: Respiratory Prevention and Management Strategies, Vaccination, and Further Perspectives. Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine. 2021. Vol. 15(8):993–1002

            7. Pantazopoulos I, Tsikrika S, Kolokytha S, Manos E, Porpodis K. Management of COVID-19 Patients in the Emergency Department. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2021. Vol. 11(10):961

            8. Chen L, Liu W, Zhang Q, Xu K, Ye G, Wu W, et al.. RNA Based mNGS Approach Identifies a Novel Human Coronavirus from Two Individual Pneumonia Cases in 2019 Wuhan Outbreak. Emerging Microbes & Infections. 2020. Vol. 9(1):313–319

            9. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al.. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020. Vol. 382(8):727–733

            10. Su S, Wong G, Shi W, Liu J, Lai ACK, Zhou J, et al.. Epidemiology, Genetic Recombination, and Pathogenesis of Coronaviruses. Trends in Microbiology. 2016. Vol. 24(6):490–502

            11. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX, et al.. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020. Vol. 382(18):1708–1720

            12. Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Zhao J, Hu Y, et al.. Clinical Features of Patients Infected with 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet (London, England). 2020. Vol. 395(10223):497–506

            13. Toscano G, Palmerini F, Ravaglia S, Ruiz L, Invernizzi P, Cuzzoni MG, et al.. Guillain-Barré Syndrome Associated with SARS-CoV-2. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020. Vol. 382(26):2574–2576

            14. Chen H, Guo J, Wang C, Luo F, Yu X, Zhang W, et al.. Clinical Characteristics and Intrauterine Vertical Transmission Potential of COVID-19 Infection in Nine Pregnant Women: A Retrospective Review of Medical Records. Lancet (London, England). 2020. Vol. 395(10226):809–815

            15. Baud D, Greub G, Favre G, Gengler C, Jaton K, Dubruc E, et al.. Second-Trimester Miscarriage in a Pregnant Woman With SARS-CoV-2 Infection. JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323(21):2198–2200

            16. Li D, Jin M, Bao P, Zhao W, Zhang S. Clinical Characteristics and Results of Semen Tests Among Men With Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Network Open. 2020. Vol. 3(5):e208292

            17. Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S, et al.. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell. 2020. Vol. 181(2):271–280.e278

            18. Qi F, Qian S, Zhang S, Zhang Z. Single Cell RNA Sequencing of 13 Human Tissues Identify Cell Types and Receptors of Human Coronaviruses. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2020. Vol. 526(1):135–140

            19. Siddiqi HK, Libby P, Ridker PM. COVID-19 – A Vascular Disease. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine. 2021. Vol. 31(1):1–5

            20. Wu JT, Leung K, Leung GM. Nowcasting and Forecasting the Potential Domestic and International Spread of the 2019-nCoV Outbreak Originating in Wuhan, China: A Modelling Study. Lancet (London, England). 2020. Vol. 395(10225):689–697

            21. Liu Y, Gayle AA, Wilder-Smith A, Rocklöv J. The Reproductive Number of COVID-19 is Higher Compared to SARS Coronavirus. Journal of Travel Medicine. 2020. Vol. 27(2):taaa021

            22. Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF. A Novel Coronavirus Outbreak of Global Health Concern. Lancet (London, England). 2020. Vol. 395(10223):470–473

            23. Adams JG, Walls RM. Supporting the Health Care Workforce During the COVID-19 Global Epidemic. JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323(15):1439–1440

            24. Xiang YT, Yang Y, Li W, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Cheung T, et al.. Timely Mental Health Care for the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Outbreak is Urgently Needed. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020. Vol. 7(3):228–229

            25. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N, et al.. Factors Associated With Mental Health Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to Coronavirus Disease 2019. JAMA Network Open. 2020. Vol. 3(3):e203976

            26. van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH, Holbrook MG, Gamble A, Williamson BN, et al.. Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020. Vol. 382(16):1564–1567

            27. Ong SWX, Tan YK, Chia PY, Lee TH, Ng OT, Wong MSY, et al.. Air, Surface Environmental, and Personal Protective Equipment Contamination by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) From a Symptomatic Patient. JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323(16):1610–1612

            28. Wang W, Xu Y, Gao R, Lu R, Han K, Wu G, et al.. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Different Types of Clinical Specimens. JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323(18):1843–1844

            29. Bai Y, Yao L, Wei T, Tian F, Jin DY, Chen L, et al.. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323(14):1406–1407

            30. Mouliou DS, Pantazopoulos I, Gourgoulianis KI. Medical/Surgical, Cloth and FFP/(K)N95 Masks: Unmasking Preference, SARS-CoV-2 Transmissibility and Respiratory Side Effects. 2022. Vol. 12(3):325

            31. Mouliou DS, Pantazopoulos I, Gourgoulianis KI. Social Response to the Vaccine Against COVID-19: The Underrated Power of Influence. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 2022. Vol. 12(1):15

            32. Chan JF, Yuan S, Kok KH, To KK, Chu H, Yang J, et al.. A Familial Cluster of Pneumonia Associated with the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Indicating Person-to-person Transmission: A Study of a Family Cluster. Lancet (London, England). 2020. Vol. 395(10223):514–523

            33. Tian S, Hu W, Niu L, Liu H, Xu H, Xiao SY. Pulmonary Pathology of Early-Phase 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pneumonia in Two Patients With Lung Cancer. Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 2020. Vol. 15(5):700–704

            34. Xu X, Han M, Li T, Sun W, Wang D, Fu B, et al.. Effective Treatment of Severe COVID-19 Patients with Tocilizumab. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2020. Vol. 117(20):10970–10975

            35. Sheahan TP, Sims AC, Leist SR, Schäfer A, Won J, Brown AJ, et al.. Comparative Therapeutic Efficacy of Remdesivir and Combination Lopinavir, Ritonavir, and Interferon Beta Against MERS-CoV. Nature Communications. 2020. Vol. 11(1):222

            36. Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, Yang X, Liu J, Xu M, et al.. Remdesivir and Chloroquine Effectively Inhibit the Recently Emerged Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) In Vitro. Cell Research. 2020. Vol. 30(3):269–271

            37. Wang Y, Zhang D, Du G, Du R, Zhao J, Jin Y, et al.. Remdesivir in Adults with Severe COVID-19: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicentre Trial. Lancet (London, England). 2020. Vol. 395(10236):1569–1578

            38. McMahon JH, Udy A, Peleg AY. Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 – Preliminary Report. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020. Vol. 383(10):992–993

            39. Mulangu S, Dodd LE, Davey RT Jr, Tshiani Mbaya O, Proschan M, Mukadi D, et al.. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ebola Virus Disease Therapeutics. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2019. Vol. 381(24):2293–2303

            40. Cao B, Wang Y, Wen D, Liu W, Wang J, Fan G, et al.. A Trial of Lopinavir-Ritonavir in Adults Hospitalized with Severe Covid-19. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020. Vol. 382(19):1787–1799

            41. Chu CM, Cheng VC, Hung IF, Wong MM, Chan KH, Chan KS, et al.. Role of Lopinavir/ritonavir in the Treatment of SARS: Initial Virological and Clinical Findings. Thorax. 2004. Vol. 59(3):252–256

            42. Kim UJ, Won EJ, Kee SJ, Jung SI, Jang HC. Combination Therapy with Lopinavir/ritonavir, Ribavirin and Interferon-α for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. Antiviral Therapy. 2016. Vol. 21(5):455–459

            43. Young BE, Ong SWX, Kalimuddin S, Low JG, Tan SY, Loh J, et al.. Epidemiologic Features and Clinical Course of Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 in Singapore. JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323(15):1488–1494

            44. Cai Q, Huang D, Yu H, Zhu Z, Xia Z, Su Y, et al.. COVID-19: Abnormal Liver Function Tests. Journal of Hepatology. 2020. Vol. 73(3):566–574

            45. Vincent MJ, Bergeron E, Benjannet S, Erickson BR, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, et al.. Chloroquine is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread. Virology Journal. 2005. Vol. 2:69

            46. Gao J, Tian Z, Yang X. Breakthrough: Chloroquine Phosphate has Shown Apparent Efficacy in Treatment of COVID-19 Associated Pneumonia in Clinical Studies. Bioscience Trends. 2020. Vol. 14(1):72–73

            47. Kalil AC. Treating COVID-19-Off-Label Drug Use, Compassionate Use, and Randomized Clinical Trials During Pandemics. JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323(19):1897–1898

            48. Frisk-Holmberg M, Bergqvist Y, Englund U. Chloroquine Intoxication. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 1983. Vol. 15(4):502–503

            49. Chatre C, Roubille F, Vernhet H, Jorgensen C, Pers YM. Cardiac Complications Attributed to Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Drug Safety. 2018. Vol. 41(10):919–931

            50. Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Hoang VT, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, et al.. Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin as a Treatment of COVID-19: Results of an Open-label Non-randomized Clinical Trial. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2020. Vol. 56(1):105949

            51. Yao X, Ye F, Zhang M, Cui C, Huang B, Niu P, et al.. In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Projection of Optimized Dosing Design of Hydroxychloroquine for the Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020. Vol. 71(15):732–739

            52. Geleris J, Sun Y, Platt J, Zucker J, Baldwin M, Hripcsak G, et al.. Observational Study of Hydroxychloroquine in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2020. Vol. 382(25):2411–2418

            53. Chen RC, Tang XP, Tan SY, Liang BL, Wan ZY, Fang JQ, et al.. Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome With Glucosteroids: The Guangzhou Experience. Chest. 2006. Vol. 129(6):1441–1452

            54. Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, Xia J, Zhou X, Xu S, et al.. Risk Factors Associated with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Death in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2020. Vol. 180(7):934–943

            55. Xiao JZ, Ma L, Gao J, Yang ZJ, Xing XY, Zhao HC, et al.. [Glucocorticoid-Induced Diabetes in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: The Impact of High Dosage and Duration of Methylprednisolone Therapy]. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2004. Vol. 43(3):179–182

            56. Li YM, Wang SX, Gao HS, Wang JG, Wei CS, Chen LM, et al.. [Factors of Avascular Necrosis of Femoral Head and Osteoporosis in SARS Patients’ Convalescence]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004. Vol. 84(16):1348–1353

            57. Ni YN, Chen G, Sun J, Liang BM, Liang ZA. The Effect of Corticosteroids on Mortality of Patients With Influenza Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Critical Care (London, England). 2019. Vol. 23(1):99

            58. Stockman LJ, Bellamy R, Garner P. SARS: Systematic Review of Treatment Effects. PLoS Medicine. 2006. Vol. 3(9):e343

            59. Morra ME, Van Thanh L, Kamel MG, Ghazy AA, Altibi AMA, Dat LM, et al.. Clinical Outcomes of Current Medical Approaches for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reviews in Medical Virology. 2018. Vol. 28(3):e1977

            60. Arabi YM, Shalhoub S, Mandourah Y, Al-Hameed F, Al-Omari A, Al Qasim E, et al.. Ribavirin and Interferon Therapy for Critically Ill Patients With Middle East Respiratory Syndrome: A Multicenter Observational Study. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2020. Vol. 70(9):1837–1844

            61. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, Fan G, Liu Y, Liu Z, et al.. Clinical Course and Risk Factors for Mortality of Adult Inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Lancet (London, England). 2020. Vol. 395(10229):1054–1062

            62. Mouliou DS, Kotsiou OS, Gourgoulianis KI. Estimates of COVID-19 Risk Factors Among Social Strata and Predictors for a Vulnerability to the Infection. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021. Vol. 18(16):8701

            63. Yu N, Li W, Kang Q, Xiong Z, Wang S, Lin X, et al.. Clinical Features and Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes of Pregnant Patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A Retrospective, Single-Centre, Descriptive Study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2020. Vol. 20(5):559–564

            64. Gunnell D, Appleby L, Arensman E, Hawton K, John A, Kapur N, et al.. Suicide Risk and Prevention During the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020. Vol. 7(6):468–471

            65. Chen S, Zhang Z, Yang J, Wang J, Zhai X, Bärnighausen T, et al.. Fangcang Shelter Hospitals: A Novel Concept for Responding to Public Health Emergencies. Lancet (London, England). 2020. Vol. 395(10232):1305–1314

            66. Liu Y, Ning Z, Chen Y, Guo M, Liu Y, Gali NK, et al.. Aerodynamic Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in Two Wuhan hospitals. Nature. 2020. Vol. 582(7813):557–560

            67. Christian MD, Hawryluck L, Wax RS, Cook T, Lazar NM, Herridge MS, et al.. Development of a Triage Protocol for Critical Care During an Influenza Pandemic. CMAJ Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2006. Vol. 175(11):1377–1381

            68. Swiss Academy Of Medical S. COVID-19 Pandemic: Triage for Intensive-Care Treatment Under Resource Scarcity. Swiss Medical Weekly. 2020. Vol. 150:w20229

            69. Christian MD, Sprung CL, King MA, Dichter JR, Kissoon N, Devereaux AV, et al.. Triage: Care of the Critically Ill and Injured During Pandemics and Disasters: CHEST Consensus Statement. Chest. 2014. Vol. 146 Suppl 4:e61S–74S

            70. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, Zhu F, Liu X, Zhang J, et al.. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. Jama. 2020. Vol. 323(11):1061–1069

            71. Du Y, Tu L, Zhu P, Mu M, Wang R, Yang P, et al.. Clinical Features of 85 Fatal Cases of COVID-19 from Wuhan. A Retrospective Observational Study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2020. Vol. 201(11):1372–1379

            72. Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2013. Vol. 369(22):2126–2136

            73. Fielding-Singh V, Matthay MA, Calfee CS. Beyond Low Tidal Volume Ventilation: Treatment Adjuncts for Severe Respiratory Failure in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Critical Care Medicine. 2018. Vol. 46(11):1820–1831

            74. Steinberg KP, Hudson LD, Goodman RB, Hough CL, Lanken PN, Hyzy R, et al.. Efficacy and Safety of Corticosteroids for Persistent Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2006. Vol. 354(16):1671–1684

            75. Ferguson ND, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, Mehta S, Hand L, Austin P, et al.. High-frequency oscillation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2013. Vol. 368(9):795–805

            76. Abrams D, Brodie D. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Adult Respiratory Failure: 2017 Update. Chest. 2017. Vol. 152(3):639–649

            77. Vaquer S, de Haro C, Peruga P, Oliva JC, Artigas A. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Complications and Mortality of Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Refractory Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Annals of Intensive Care. 2017. Vol. 7(1):51

            78. Fan E, Del Sorbo L, Goligher EC, Hodgson CL, Munshi L, Walkey AJ, et al.. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2017. Vol. 195(9):1253–1263

            79. Gattinoni L, Chiumello D, Caironi P, Busana M, Romitti F, Brazzi L, et al.. COVID-19 Pneumonia: Different Respiratory Treatments for Different Phenotypes? Intensive Care Medicine. 2020. Vol. 46(6):1099–1102

            80. Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, Girault C, Ragot S, Perbet S, et al.. High-Flow Oxygen Through Nasal Cannula in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2015. Vol. 372(23):2185–2196

            81. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, et al.. Comparison of Two Fluid-Management Strategies in Acute Lung Injury. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2006. Vol. 354(24):2564–2575

            82. Shen C, Wang Z, Zhao F, Yang Y, Li J, Yuan J, et al.. Treatment of 5 Critically Ill Patients with COVID-19 With Convalescent Plasma. JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323(16):1582–1589

            83. Combes A, Hajage D, Capellier G, Demoule A, Lavoué S, Guervilly C, et al.. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2018. Vol. 378(21):1965–1975

            84. Zhang C, Shi L, Wang FS. Liver Injury in COVID-19: Management and Challenges. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2020. Vol. 5(5):428–430

            85. Zhang Y, Zheng L, Liu L, Zhao M, Xiao J, Zhao Q. Liver impairment in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of 115 Cases From A Single Centre in Wuhan city, China. Liver International. 2020. Vol. 40(9):2095–2103

            86. Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ. COVID-19: Consider Cytokine Storm Syndromes and Immunosuppression. Lancet (London, England). 2020. Vol. 395(10229):1033–1034

            87. Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, et al.. Cardiovascular Implications of Fatal Outcomes of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiology. 2020. Vol. 5(7):811–818

            88. Tavazzi G, Pellegrini C, Maurelli M, Belliato M, Sciutti F, Bottazzi A, et al.. Myocardial Localization of Coronavirus in COVID-19 Cardiogenic Shock. European Journal of Heart Failure. 2020. Vol. 22(5):911–915

            89. Fanelli V, Fiorentino M, Cantaluppi V, Gesualdo L, Stallone G, Ronco C, et al.. Acute Kidney Injury in SARS-CoV-2 Infected Patients. Critical Care (London, England). 2020. Vol. 24(1):155

            90. Kellum JA, Lameire N. Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Acute Kidney Injury: A KDIGO Summary (Part 1). Critical Care (London, England). 2013. Vol. 17(1):204

            91. Li Z, Wu M, Yao J, Guo J, Liao X, Song S, et al.. Caution on Kidney Dysfunctions of COVID-19 Patients. MedRxiv. [Cross Ref]

            92. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons from the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020. Vol. 323(13):1239–1242

            93. World Health Organization: Coronavirus disease (COVID-2019) situation reports. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports[Accessed 27 May 2020]

            94. Cheng Y, Luo R, Wang K, Zhang M, Wang Z, Dong L, et al.. Kidney Disease is Associated with in-Hospital Death of Patients with COVID-19. Kidney International. 2020. Vol. 97(5):829–838

            95. Azam TU, Shadid HR, Blakely P, O’Hayer P, Berlin H, Pan M, et al.. Soluble Urokinase Receptor (SuPAR) in COVID-19-Related AKI. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2020. Vol. 31(11):2725–2735

            96. Ma C, Gu J, Hou P, Zhang L, Bai Y, Guo Z, et al.. Incidence, Clinical Characteristics and Prognostic Factor of Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. MedRxiv. [Cross Ref]

            97. Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical Predictors of Mortality Due to COVID-19 Based on An Analysis of Data of 150 Patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Medicine. 2020. Vol. 46(5):846–848

            Author and article information

            Journal
            amm
            Acta Materia Medica
            Compuscript (Ireland )
            2737-7946
            07 April 2022
            : 1
            : 1
            : 124-137
            Affiliations
            [a ]Department of Orthopedics, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China
            [b ]Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
            Author notes

            1These authors contributed equally to this article.

            Article
            10.15212/AMM-2022-0002
            a73b2141-fa2b-48ab-aa60-dec65bc1144d
            Copyright © 2022 The Authors.

            Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

            Page count
            Figures: 3, Tables: 3, References: 97, Pages: 14
            Product
            Self URI (journal-page): https://amm-journal.org/
            Categories
            Review

            Toxicology,Pathology,Biochemistry,Clinical chemistry,Pharmaceutical chemistry,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
            treatment,complications,COVID-19,prognosis,SARS-CoV-2

            Comments

            Comment on this article