435
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Three cases of Actinomyces isolation from the eye lesions of patients with a chronic and recurrent ophthalmic infection

      Published
      case-report
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Actinomycosis is an indolent, slowly progressive infection caused by Gram-positive facultative anaerobic bacteria from the genus Actinomyces. These bacteria have been reported as a cause of ophthalmic infections such as endophthalmitis, keratitis, and canaliculitis. The objective of the present study was to investigate the pattern and antibiotic sensitivity profile of anaerobes isolated from lesions in the medial canthus of the eye.

            Three pus aspirate samples (from eye) were delivered to a microbiology laboratory in a strict anaerobic condition in Robertson Cooked Meat media (RCM). The samples were inoculated on Blood Agar and incubated anaerobically in a Gas Pack Jar incubator at 5%-10% CO2 and in aerobic condition at 37°C. Pure colonies isolated on anaerobically incubated plates were identified by the VITEK® 2 COMPACT system. Antibiotic sensitivity testing was conducted using an Epsilometer-strip test.

            Three isolates identified and confirmed with the help of VITEK® 2 were Actinomyces israelii, Actinomyces odontolyticus, and Actinomyces meyeri. All three species of Actinomyces were sensitive to Vancomycin, Moxifloxacin, and Imipenem, but they were resistant to Metronidazole.

            Since there have been several cases of anaerobic ophthalmic infections reported to date, samples from patients with chronic eye infections should be analyzed for anaerobic culture for correct diagnosis and proper treatment. Moxifloxacin but not Metronidazole is a suitable drug for the treatment of anaerobic eye infection.

            Main article text

            INTRODUCTION

            Actinomycosis is a chronic infection caused by Gram-positive, facultative anaerobic bacteria from the genus Actinomyces [1]. Actinomyces has also been reported as a causative agent of such ophthalmic infections as endophthalmitis, keratitis, and canaliculitis [2]. It was reported that Actinomyces israelii is responsible for 13%-25% of the cases of chronic lacrimal canaliculitis [3].

            The severity of anaerobic ophthalmic infections can range from self-limiting to sight-threatening blindness. The emerging trend of antibiotic resistance further contributes to the development of this infection into a more dangerous and serious health threat in the future [4]. Here, we present three cases of an eye infection caused by the Actinomyces species.

            MATERIALS AND METHODS

            All patients participated in the study signed an informed consent. The aspirates from the eye lesions of patients with chronic and recurring ophthalmic infections were sent to a microbiology laboratory in Robertson’s Cooked Meat (RCM) media for the identification of the anaerobic culture and analysis of its sensitivity to antibiotics. The RCM was incubated for 48 h and then Gram staining was performed. Then, the blood agar plates were inoculated with the substructure from RCM in a triplicate manner – one plate was incubated at aerobic conditions for 24 h, another plate – in atmosphere containing 5%-10% CO2 for 24 h, and the third plate – at anaerobic conditions (sealed with parafilm) for 72 h in a Gas Pack Jar at 37°C (Fig. 1). The growth of bacteria in anaerobic conditions was confirmed by a VITEK® 2 test. The antibiotic sensitivity tests were performed using the Epsilometer strips (E-test) [5, 6, 7].

            Fig. 1.
            Gas Pack Jar

            RESULTS

            Participants
            Case 1

            In July 2021, a 45-year-old female patient visited the eye outpatient department (OPD) with complaints of severe itching, burning sensation, watering, and pain in the left eye lasting for six months. This patient has no diagnosed comorbidities other than hypertension for the past year. On examination, a small white lesion was found in the medial canthus of the left eye (Fig. 2). The vision was 20/20 in both eyes, with all other ophthalmic parameters being normal. The right eye was normal; no complaints were noted at all from the patient. The pus from the lesion of the left eye was aspirated after local anesthesia under sterile conditions. Then, the testing of the pus sample in order to check for the presence of anaerobic bacteria and their sensitivity to antibiotics has been suggested. To do this, an aspirate taken from the lesion was sent to a microbiological laboratory for analysis.

            Fig. 2.
            White color lesion in the eye of the patient (Case 1)
            Case 2

            The same patient as in the first case came again to the eye OPD after 30 days since the treatment of the first Actinomyces infection with the same complaints as during the first visit. The examination revealed one new lesion in the medial canthus of the same left eye. The analogous tests were performed as during the first visit.

            Case 3

            In September 2021, a 52-year-old female patient complained of ocular hypertension with pain and burning for 4.5 months in the left eye. She had diabetes for the past 4 years and had been taking anti-diabetic drugs (her sugar was under control). Visual acuity test showed a 20/20 score. The external examination revealed mild redness in the left eye and a grayish to white color lesion with a white pinhead in the lacrimal sac. An aspirate from the lesion was sent to a microbiology laboratory for analysis.

            Both patients recovered after the treatment with Moxifloxacin eye drops three times a day for 10 days.

            Microbiological analysis of the obtained samples

            The plates inoculated with aspirates collected from the eyes of the patients were incubated at different conditions. The plates incubated under aerobic conditions for 24 h showed no culture growth in all three cases. On the contrary, plates incubated in a CO2 atmosphere for 24 h showed bacterial growth (Fig. 3A). The colonies growing at anaerobic conditions in a Gas Pack Jar were gray in color, 2-3 mm in size, low convex, flat with irregular margin, and non-hemolytic. Thin filamentous bacilli showed a positive result in Gram stain procedure (Fig. 3B). The anaerobic growth was confirmed by VITEK® 2. The isolated bacteria were identified as Actinomyces israelii (Case 1), Actinomyces odontolyticus (Case 2), and Actinomyces meyeri (Case 3).

            Fig. 3.
            Actinomyces odontolyticus growth from the aspirate sample (Case 2) (A); bacteria stained according to the Gram procedure (B).

            According to the antibiotic susceptibility tests, all three species of Actinomyces showed sensitivity to Vancomycin, Moxifloxacin, and Imipenem but resistance to Metronidazole. The results are summarized in Table 1.

            Table 1.
            Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical Actinomyces isolates
            AntibioticMinimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
            A. israelii
            Case 1
            A. odontolyticus
            Case 2
            A. meyeri
            Case 3
            Penicillin0.2 μg/ml (S)>256 μg/ml (R)>256 μg/ml (R)
            Ampicillin0.25 μg/ml (S)>256 μg/ml (R)0.25 μg/ml (S)
            Vancomycin1.5 μg/ml (S)1.5 μg/ml (S)1.25 μg/ml (S)
            Moxifloxacin2 μg/ml (S)2 μg/ml (S)2 μg/ml (S)
            Tetracycline8 μg/ml (S)>256 μg/ml (R)>256 μg/ml (R)
            Imipenem0.5 μg/ml (S)2 μg/ml (S)3 μg/ml (S)
            Metronidazole>256 μg/ml (R)>256 μg/ml (R)>256 μg/ml (R)

            S – sensitive, R – resistant

            DISCUSSION

            Ocular infections caused by Actinomyces species are uncommon. Unilateral chronic conjunctivitis is usually caused by Actinomyces which might be associated with canaliculitis [8]. In the above-mentioned case series, we have isolated three species of Actinomyces, namely A. israelii and A. odontolyticus from the first patient and A. meyeri from the second one. Anaerobic bacteria like Actinomyces species have been reported as a causative organism in cases of canaliculitis. Propionibacterium acnes have been isolated from the lacrimal gland in 29 out of 55 healthy and diseased eyes, which show an anaerobic environment in eye, whereas Actinomyces meyeri has been reported as a causative organism of canaliculitis [9,10,11]. Actinomyces species have been commonly reported in cases of canaliculitis [12]. In addition, Actinomyces species has been associated with other ophthalmic infections, such as keratitis, dacryocystitis, conjunctivitis, and post operative endophthalmitis. Usually, no generalized systemic invasion is observed in these cases [13]. An incidence of bilateral blepharoconjunctivitis in the absence of canaliculitis due to Actinomyces species have been reported [14]. Nair et al. [15] also reported Actinomyces canaliculitis complicating congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in an infant showing the diversity of population amenable to this disease. An ocular actinomycosis mimicking meningioma caused by Actinomyces species in a 67-year-old female patient was described by Kobayashi et al. [1]. The case of chronic lacrimal canaliculitis caused by A. israelii in a 70-year-old retired male patient was described by Mohanty et al. [16]. Bhole et al. [17] described a case of keratoactinomycosis in a 50-year-old female farmer caused by Actinomyces species after vegetative trauma. The case of Actinomycotic lacrimal canaliculitis was described in a 60-year-old male patient [18]. Hickman et al. [19] also presented a case of lacrimal canaliculitis with bleeding from the eye caused by the Actinomyces species. The above-mentioned studies prove the significant role of Actinomyces species as a causative agent of ocular infections worldwide. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports published on cases with the infections caused by Actinomyces israelii and Actinomyces odontolyticus in the same patient in a 30-day gap. All of the above studies showed that the different species of Actinomyces cause ophthalmic infection in a broad diversity of patients.

            CONCLUSION

            Anaerobic bacteria should be considered as a possible causative agent of every chronic ocular infection, and the corresponding laboratory tests should be performed. Since we found the resistance to Metronidazole in all three reported here cases, antibiotic susceptibility tests should always be performed before any antibiotic treatment. Proper susceptibility testing before the treatment decreases the chance of the development of an antibiotic resistance pattern.

            Footnotes

            Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest.

            REFERENCES

            1. Kobayashi T, Ford B, Fujita N, Appenheimer AB. Occular Actinomycosis Mimicking Meningioma. Open forum Infect Dis 2020; 7, ofaa170. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa170.

            2. Kononen E, Wade WG. Actinomycesandreleated organisms in human infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015; 28, 419-42. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00100-14.

            3. Baldursdóttir E, Sigurdsson H, Jónasson L, Gottfredsson M. Actinomycotic canaliculitis: resolution following surgery and short topical antibiotic treatment. Acta Ophthalmol 2010; 88, 367-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01367.

            4. Sharma S. Antibiotics and Resistance in ocular infections.Indian J Med Microbiol 2011; 29, 218-22. doi: 10.4103/0255-0857.83903.

            5. CLSI 2020, 30th edition, M 100; 100-2.

            6. Gajdács M, Spengler G, Urbán E. Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Anaerobic Bacteria: Rubik›s Cube of Clinical Microbiology? Antibiotics (Basel) 2017; 6, 25. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics6040025.

            7. Schuetz AN. Antimicrobial resistance and susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Clinical infectious diseases 2014; 59, 698-705. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu395.

            8. Weese WC, Smith IM. A Study of 57 Cases of Actinomycosis Over a 36-Year Period:A Diagnostic ‘Failure’ With Good Prognosis After Treatment. Arch Intern Med 1975; 135, 1562-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1975.00330120040006.

            9. Pine L, Shearin WA, Gonzales CA. Mycotic flora of the lacrimal duct. American J Opthal 1961; 52, 619-25.

            10. Hussain I, Bonshek RE, Loudon K, Armstrong M, Tullo AB. Canalicular infection caused by Actinomyces. Eye (Lond) 1993; 7(4), 542-4. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.118.

            11. Kerttula AM, Carlson P, Sarkonen N, Hall V, Könönen E. Enzymatic/biochemical analysis of Actinomyces with commercial test kits with an emphasis on newly described species. Anaerobe 2005; 11(1-2), 99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2004.11.002.

            12. Linc SC, Kao SC, Tsai CC, Chang CY, Kau HC, Hsu WM et al. Clinical characteristics and factors associated the outcome of lacrimal canaliculitis. Acta Opthalmol 2011; 89, 759-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01827.x.

            13. Hall V. Actinomyces—Gathering evidence of human colonization and infection. Anaerobe 2008; 14(1), 1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2007.12.001.

            14. Mehrotra N, Baidya A, Brijwal M, Aggarwal R, Chaudhry R. Actinomycosis of eye: Forgotten but not uncommon. Anaerobe 2015; 35(B), 1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.06.001.

            15. Nair AG, Potdar NA, Gore SS, Ganvir AY, Apte MK,Marathe TR et al. Actinomycetes canaliculitis complicating congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in an infant. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018; 66, 574-7. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1075_17.

            16. Mohanty S, Subhrajyoti S, Parija S, Praharaj AK. A case of chronic lacrimal canaliculitis: revisiting the role of Actinomyces israelii. Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases [online] 2017; 21(5), 574-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2017.05.003.

            17. Bhole PK, Parmar DP. Keratoactinomycosis: A rare case report. J Clin Ophthalmol Res 2019; 7, 24-6. doi: 10.4103/jcor.jcor_3_18.

            18. Bashir H, Asifa N. Actinomycotic lacrimal canaliculitis: a rare case report. Int J Adv Med 2019; 6(3), 973-5. doi: 10.18203/2349-3933.ijam20192274.

            19. Hickman Casey T, Sisley M, Saldana W et al. Bleeding From the Eye: An Unusual Presentation of Lacrimal Canaliculitis. Cureus 2021; 13(12), e20567. doi:10.7759/cureus.20567.

            Author and article information

            Journal
            MIR J
            Microbiology Independent Research Journal (MIR Journal)
            Doctrine
            2500-2236
            2022
            02 November 2022
            : 9
            : 1
            : 113-116
            Affiliations
            [-1]Department of Microbiology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College, and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, 110029, India
            Author notes
            [# ] For correspondence: Bhawna Sharma, VMMC & Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi - 110029, India, e-mail: bhawna229150@ 123456gmail.com
            Author information
            https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4766-0455
            https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1420-3573
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7600-5292
            Article
            10.18527/2500-2236-2022-9-1-113-116
            4d80fb18-77bb-4429-8918-f7cdfd181f13
            © 2022 Sharma et al.

            This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License (CC BYNC-SA), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the material is not used for commercial purposes, provided that the original author and source are cited.

            History
            : 08 March 2022
            : 17 October 2022
            Categories
            CASE SERIES

            Immunology,Pharmaceutical chemistry,Biotechnology,Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine,Infectious disease & Microbiology,Microbiology & Virology
            anaerobic infection, Actinomyces species,eye infection

            Comments

            Comment on this article