210
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Clinical Characteristics and Complications in Patients Undergoing Permanent Pacemaker Implantation

      Published
      research-article
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Background: Pacemakers are electronic impulse generators that are implanted to restore a regular heart rhythm in patients with symptomatic bradycardia. A large body of epidemiological data on permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) originates from developed countries with minimal data from developing regions, especially sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to describe patient demographics, clinical indications, short-term and long-term complications in patients undergoing PPI at the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, which is a large urban public teaching hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa.

            Methods: We retrospectively reviewed in-patient and out-patient medical records of consecutive patients who underwent index PPI over ten years (January 2009 to November 2018).

            Results: The study cohort comprised of 565 patients, of which 325 (57.52%) were female. The median age at first PPI was 71.8 [interquartile range: 61.7–78.8] years. The indications for pacemaker implantation were atrioventricular (AV) block in 417 (73.81%) and sinus node dysfunction in 114 (20.18%). A total of 40 (7.08%) patients experienced PPI-related complications. Lead dislodgement was the most common complication occurring in 16 (3.05%) patients. Females were 3.8 times more likely to experience a complication [odds ratio (OR): 3.80; 95% CI: 1.40–10.32, P = 0.009].

            Conclusion: In this study, AV block was the most common indication for PPI, and the complication rate was found to be 7.08%. Furthermore, the risk of developing a complication was significantly higher in females.

            Main article text

            INTRODUCTION

            Cardiac pacemakers have become the standard of care for treating persistent, symptomatic bradyarrhythmias such as atrioventricular block, sick sinus syndrome and atrial fibrillation with bradycardia.(1) Epidemiological data on permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) emanates predominantly from economically developed countries, with a paucity of published data from sub-Saharan Africa.(24) One reason for the lack of data is the high cost of pacemakers which has resulted in limited access for deserving patients in economically disadvantaged countries. Over a 10-year period between 2003 and 2013, 1257 first implant permanent pacemakers were implanted at a tertiary academic centre in Cape Town.(5) A survey in 1998 by the Cardiac Arrhythmia Society of South Africa reported an overall pacemaker implantation rate of only 39 per million in South Africa.(6) A subsequent report in 2016 showed that this rate had increased significantly to 138 per million.(7)

            This study aims to describe patient demographics, clinical indications, short-term and long-term complications in patients undergoing PPI at the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH), a large urban public teaching hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. At present, approximately 100 permanent pacemakers are implanted annually in our institution. Yet complications associated with PPI have not been studied locally, despite numerous studies reporting an inverse relationship between institutional annual procedural volumes and complications.(2,8)

            METHODS

            We conducted a retrospective review of in-patient and out-patient medical records of patients 18 years of age and older, who underwent PPI in the division of cardiology at CMJAH between January 2009 and November 2018. We excluded patients with temporary pacemaker implantation, implantable loop recorder implants as well as patients referred for an impulse generator box change.

            In our institution, active leads are placed in all patients. After pacemaker implantation or generator box change, patients are referred for a chest x-ray to exclude complications such as a pneumothorax. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices were not routinely implanted between January 2009 and November 2018 and this small group of patients has been excluded from the study analysis.

            Data was collected from the PPI operative reports, in-patient medical records and out-patient pacemaker clinic files. Demographic data, comorbidities and chronic oral medication data were extracted. The laboratory biochemistry parameters collected included the white cell count (WCC), platelet count, international normalized ratio (INR), C-reactive protein (CRP), urea and electrolytes, creatinine and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The laboratory biochemistry results were retrieved from the National Health Laboratory Service electronic database.

            Data from the PPI procedure included the date of the first implantation, pacemaker model, mode of pacing and the underlying cardiac rhythm. Complications for PPI were classified as short-term (occurring during the implantation admission) and long-term (occurring at any time after discharge from hospital). Complications included pacemaker implantation-related infection or sepsis, haemorrhage, haemothorax, haematoma, pneumothorax, diaphragm stimulation, lead dislodgement, lead fracture, ventricular perforation and death. For comparison purposes, we divided the study patients into two groups based on the occurrence of complications. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee.

            Statistical analysis

            Categorical variables are expressed as numbers and percentages and were compared using the Chi-square test. We used the Shapiro–Wilk test and the skewness and kurtosis test to assess for normality. Continuous variables with a normal distribution are expressed as mean and standard deviation. The median and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were used for continuous variables with a non-normal distribution. We compared normally distributed continuous variables by using the Student t-test, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann–Whitney) test was used to compare medians for non-normal data. Variables with a P-value less than 0.25 in the univariate logistic regression analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. The odds ratio was calculated with its 95% confidence intervals (CI), and differences were considered statistically significant at a P-value less than 0.05. All analyses were conducted using STATA Version 16.0 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas, USA).

            RESULTS

            Between January 2009 and November 2018, 573 patients underwent index PPI (Figure 1). Five patients had incomplete medical records, and an additional three patients were younger than 18 years of age at the time of the first pacemaker implantation. These patients were excluded from the study (Figure 2). The final study population comprised of 565 patients, with 325 (57.5%) females. At first pacemaker implantation, the median age was 71.8 (IQR: 61.7–78.8) years, and hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity, reported in 237 (41.95%) patients. The rest of the baseline demographic and clinical parameters are reported in Table 1.

            Fig 1:

            Index permanent pacemakers implanted between the year 2009 and 2018 at CMJAH

            Fig 2:

            Study flow chart

            Table 1:

            Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of patients referred for permanent pacemaker implantation according to the occurrence of short and long-term complications

            VariableOverall population (n = 565)Complications yes (n = 40)Complications no (n = 525) P-value
            Age (years)71.8 (61.7–78.8)70.9 (59.9–78.1)71.9 (61.7–78.8)0.491
            Females325 (57.52)31 (77.50)294 (56.00)0.008
            Ethnicity 0.290
            African260 (46.02)24 (60.00)236 (44.95)
            Caucasian227 (40.18)11 (27.50)216 (41.14)
            Indian53 (9.38)3 (7.50)50 (9.52)
            Mixed ancestry25 (4.42)2 (5.00)23 (4.38)
            Comorbidities
            Hypertension237 (41.95)20 (50.00)217 (41.33)0.284
            Diabetes Mellitus56 (9.91)5 (12.50)51 (9.71)0.570
            IHD36 (6.37)0 (0)36 (6.86)0.087
            Cardiomyopathy36 (6.37)5 (12.50)31 (5.90)0.100
            CKD24 (4.25)1 (2.50)23 (4.38)0.570
            Biochemistry
            WCC (109/L)7.04 (5.73–8.67)7.96 (5.98–9.55)7.01 (5.72–8.44)0.104
            Platelets (109/L)287 (211–366)262 (222–294)290 (209–367)0.258
            CRP (mg/L)10 (10–13)10 (10–15)10 (10–13)0.351
            INR1.07 (1.01–1.14)1.07 (1.04–1.21)1.07 (1.01–1.13)0.243
            GFR (ml/min) 1.7 m2 76.2 (55.3–92.4)76.4 (55.3–92.4)76.4 (55.3–92.4)0.489

            Data shown as mean and standard deviation for normally distributed variables. The median and interquartile ranges (IQR) were used for continuous variables with a skewed distribution. CKD: chronic kidney disease; CRP: C-reactive protein; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; WCC: white cell count; IHD: ischaemic heart disease; INR: international normalized ratio.

            Atrioventricular heart block was the most common indication for PPI and was diagnosed in 417 (73.81%) patients (Figure 3). Dual sensing, dual pacing and dual inhibition (DDD) was the most common mode of pacing (72.60%), followed by ventricular sensing, ventricular pacing and inhibition (VVI) (24.20%), atrial sensing, atrial pacing and atrial inhibition (AAI) (1.42%) and ventricular pacing, dual-sensing and dual inhibition (VDD) (1.42%). Only two patients had ventricular pacing, no sensing and no inhibition (VOO) pacemaker modes.

            Fig 3:

            Indications for permanent pacemaker implantation. AV = atrioventricular block

            A total of 40 (7.08%) patients experienced short-term and long-term complications. Of the short-term complications, pacing lead dislodgement occurred in 9 (1.59%) patients, pneumothorax in 6 (1.06%) patients, infections in 3 (0.53%) patients, excessive haemorrhage in 2 (0.35%) patients and a haemothorax occurred in 1 (0.17%) patient. The exact nature of the complication was not specified in six patients. None of the patients experienced cardiac arrest peri-operatively. A 78-year-old female with a background medical history of a haematological malignancy complicated with a pneumothorax, which required an intercostal drain but further complicated with an empyema on day three post PPI. The patient was optimally treated in the intensive care unit after surgical drainage of the empyema. She later complicated with sepsis-related multiple organ failure and subsequently demised.

            The most common long-term complication was lead dislodgement, which was documented in 7 (1.24%) patients, followed by sepsis in 5 (0.88%) patients, haematoma in 3 (0.52%) patients and two patients each experienced diaphragm stimulation and a lead fracture. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified female gender as the only independent predictor for a complication, with females 3.8 times more likely to experience a complication post pacemaker implantation [odds ratio (OR): 3.80; 95% CI: 1.40–10.32, P = 0.009] (Table 2).

            Table 2:

            Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis for predictors of short and long-term complications

            Univariate logistic regressionMultivariate logistic regression
            Odds ratio P-value95% CIOdds ratio P-value95% CI
            Age, years0.990.2960.96–1.01
            Females2.710.0101.26–5.793.800.0091.40–10.32
            Diabetes mellitus1.320.5710.49–3.53
            White cell count1.110.1400.96–1.28
            Platelets0.990.1560.99–1.00
            C-reactive protein1.000.7700.98–1.02

            DISCUSSION

            In this study, symptomatic bradycardia requiring pacing was found mostly in the elderly, with AV block being the most common indication for PPI. We found that the median age at first implantation was 71.8 years, similar to data by Antonelli et al. from Israel, who reported a mean age of 74.6 years at implantation.(9)

            The predominance of females in our study is possibly related to a higher life expectancy for females in South Africa.(10) In a Turkish study, nearly 50% of patients that underwent PPI were women, in keeping with our study findings.(11) In the current study, females were 3.8 times more likely to experience a complication. Similarly, Nowak et al. found a higher rate of acute complications in females referred for pacemaker implantation.(12) Moreover, in a large population-based cohort study of 28,860 Danish patients who underwent PPI, the adjusted odds ratio for pneumothorax in females was 1.9 (95% CI: 1.4–2.6, P < 0.001).(13) We are unable to hypothesize a physiologically plausible explanation for this observation. Contrary to our findings, Udo et al. reported that male gender was as an independent predictor for a complication within two months of PPI.(4)

            In a multicentre database of 64,951 Japanese patients who underwent pacemaker implantation, the incidence of in-hospital complications was 2.5%.(14) The independent predictors of complications were haemodialysis, female gender, and a body mass index less than 18.5 kg/m.2(14) Kirkfeldt et al. found that implantation in a non-university hospital, an inexperienced operator who has performed less than 25 pacemaker implantations, a dual-chamber pacemaker device and passive fixation of the right atrial lead, all increased the risk of complications.(2)

            Another study involving 1517 patients receiving index pacemakers between 2003 and 2007 reported a short-term and long-term complication rate of 12.4% and 9.2%, respectively. The predictors of short-term complications were male gender, advanced age, an increased body mass index, anticoagulation drugs and passive atrial lead fixation. Predictors of long-term complications were an increased body mass index, hypertension and dual-chamber device implantation.(4) These complication rates are higher than the complication rate of 7.08% found in our study cohort, but these differences may be due to diverse definitions for a clinically significant complication.

            In the current study, haematology and biochemical parameters were routinely assessed in all patients before PPI. The WCC and CRP levels were done to exclude any pre-existing infective process that may predispose the patient to pacemaker sepsis.(15) Most of our study patients had WCC and CRP levels within the normal range. However, even patients with marginally elevated WCC and CRP levels did not demonstrate higher rates of sepsis compared to patients with a normal CRP and WCC.

            Pacemaker sepsis is a clinically challenging complication that requires complete removal of the pacemaker device and implantation of a new device at a different site after a full course of antibiotic therapy.(16) Contemporary data indicates that the incidence of device infection after PPI is 0.1%–0.7% and 0.7%–1.2% for implantable cardiac defibrillators.(17) In our study, infection/sepsis was diagnosed in 0.53% and 0.88% of patients, in the peri-operative period and post-hospital discharge, respectively. Despite the fact that we did not document procedural times during pacemaker implantation, we hypothesize that sepsis in our patients could possibly be related to relative operator inexperience and attendant increased procedural duration as our unit is a cardiology fellow training site.

            STUDY LIMITATIONS

            The occurrence of complications may not have been meticulously documented in clinical notes, leading to under- reporting of complications. Another limitation of this study is the lack of data on the number of operators and the operator's level of experience as there is a known association between the occurrence of complications and the operator's level of experience. The presence of structural heart disease was also not documented, although most of our patients were routinely screened with an echocardiogram before PPI.

            CONCLUSION

            In our study, atrioventricular block was the most common indication for PPI. The overall institutional complication rate was 7.08%, which is very similar to rates reported in economically developed countries. Furthermore, the risk of developing a complication was found to be significantly higher in females.

            ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

            The authors would like to thank Mr. Mthunzi Mbatha for assisting with the retrieval of patient records and data collection.

            References

            1. BrignoleM, AuricchioA, Baron-EsquiviasG, et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur Heart J. 2013; 34(29):2281–2329.

            2. KirkfeldtRE, JohansenJB, NohrEA, et al. Risk factors for lead complications in cardiac pacing: a population-based cohort study of 28,860 Danish patients. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8(10):1622–1628.

            3. PakarinenS, OikarinenL, ToivonenL. Short-term implantation-related complications of cardiac rhythm management device therapy: a retrospective single-centre 1-year survey. Europace. 2010; 12(1):103–108.

            4. UdoEO, ZuithoffNP, van HemelNM, et al. Incidence and predictors of short- and long-term complications in pacemaker therapy: the FOLLOWPACE study. Heart Rhythm. 2012; 9(5):728–735.

            5. JamaZV, ChinA, BadriM, MayosiBM. Performance of re-used pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators compared with new devices at Groote Schuur Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2015; 26(4):181–187.

            6. MillarRN, Cardiac Arrhythmia Society of South A. 1998 survey of cardiac pacing in South Africa—report of the working group on registries of the cardiac arrhythmia society of South Africa (CASSA). S Afr Med J. 2001; 91(10):873–876.

            7. BonnyA, NgantchaM, JeilanM, et al. Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and interventional electrophysiological procedures in Africa from 2011 to 2016: report of the Pan African Society of Cardiology (PASCAR) Cardiac Arrhythmias and Pacing Task Forces. Europace. 2017; 20(9):1513–1526.

            8. NowakB, TascheK, BarnewoldL, et al. Association between hospital procedure volume and early complications after pacemaker implantation: results from a large, unselected, contemporary cohort of the German nationwide obligatory external quality assurance programme. Europace. 2015; 17(5):787–793.

            9. AntonelliD, IlanLB, FreedbergNA, et al. Trends of permanent pacemaker implantation in a single center over a 20-year period. Harefuah. 2015; 154(5):288–291, 340.

            10. Mid-year population estimates 2019. Available from: www.statssa.gov.za (accessed 27.07.20).

            11. BayataS, YesilM, ArikanE, et al. Retrospective analysis of 1650 permanent pacemaker implantations experience over two different consecutive time periods in a single cardiology clinic. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2010; 10(2):130–134.

            12. NowakB, MisselwitzB, ErdoganA, et al. Do gender differences exist in pacemaker implantation? Results of an obligatory external quality control program. Europace. 2010; 12(2):210–215.

            13. KirkfeldtRE, JohansenJB, NohrEA, et al. Pneumothorax in cardiac pacing: a population-based cohort study of 28,860 Danish patients. Europace. 2012; 14(8):1132–1138.

            14. ShakyaS, MatsuiH, FushimiK, YasunagaH. In-hospital complications after implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices: Analysis of a national in-patient database in Japan. J Cardiol. 2017; 70(5):405–410.

            15. KlugD, BaldeM, PavinD, et al. Risk factors related to infections of implanted pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators: results of a large prospective study. Circulation. 2007; 116(12):1349–1355.

            16. NofE, EpsteinLM. Complications of cardiac implants: handling device infections. Eur Heart J. 2013; 34(3):229–236.

            17. KorantzopoulosP, SiderisS, DilaverisP, et al. Infection control in implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices: current evidence, controversial points, and unresolved issues. Europace. 2016; 18(4):473–478.

            Author and article information

            Journal
            WUP
            Wits Journal of Clinical Medicine
            Wits University Press (5th Floor University Corner, Braamfontein, 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa )
            2618-0189
            2618-0197
            2021
            : 3
            : 1
            : 19-24
            Affiliations
            Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
            Author notes
            [* ] Correspondence to: Nqoba Tsabedze, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand and the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, 17 Jubilee Road, Parktown, 2193, Johannesburg, Gauteng Province, South Africa. Telephone number: +27 114883611, Nqoba.Tsabedze@ 123456wits.ac.za
            Author information
            https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3664-8995
            https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3769-4686
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5092-0126
            https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7226-3115
            https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7210-1447
            Article
            WJCM
            10.18772/26180197.2021.v3n1a3
            2b36c140-68e2-42ef-bdb5-d65ac78b930a
            WITS

            Distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial NoDerivatives License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/, which permits noncommercial use and distribution in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited, and the original work is not modified.

            History
            Categories
            Research Article

            General medicine,Medicine,Internal medicine
            Permanent pacemaker implantation,symptomatic bradycardia,complications

            Comments

            Comment on this article