Average rating: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of importance: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of validity: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Level of completeness: | Rated 4 of 5. |
Level of comprehensibility: | Rated 5 of 5. |
Competing interests: | None |
ScienceOpen disciplines: | Earth & Environmental sciences, Life sciences |
Keywords: | biotechnology, carbon sequestration, carbonate chemistry, aquaculture, carbonate biology, remediation., climate change |
The review proposed by Moore and colleagues is timely and thoroughly delves into the arguments. After introducing the problem of recognising the carbon sink role played by the shells of bivalve molluscs and other calcifying organisms, it addresses and argues, point by point, the criticisms raised, providing appropriate bibliographic references and examples. The authors range from describing the chemistry in open waters vs what happens in coastal marine contexts, where the farms are located, describing the processes of calcium carbonate formation. Then they describe aspects such as the physiological mechanisms that regulate the formation of calcium carbonate and the release of CO2 resulting from the process, which does not take place in an aquatic environment but within the organism and its membranes, and ends by describing how multiple disciplines and tools (e.g. LCA) support their arguments. A minor shortcoming that may be noted is that the work perhaps fails to mention the importance of the dependence of environmental conditions (pH, CO2 partial pressure, salinity and temperature) for the conversion efficiency of hydrogen carbonate and calcium ion to calcium carbonate. However, overall, the work is really significant for the fervent scientific debate on this topic.