142
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Screening for social determinants of health in clinical care: moving from the margins to the mainstream

      Public Health Reviews
      Springer Science and Business Media LLC

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background Screening for the social determinants of health in clinical practice is still widely debated. Methods A scoping review was used to (1) explore the various screening tools that are available to identify social risk, (2) examine the impact that screening for social determinants has on health and social outcomes, and (3) identify factors that promote the uptake of screening in routine clinical care. Results Over the last two decades, a growing number of screening tools have been developed to help frontline health workers ask about the social determinants of health in clinical care. In addition to clinical practice guidelines that recommend screening for specific areas of social risk (e.g., violence in pregnancy), there is also a growing body of evidence exploring the use of screening or case finding for identifying multiple domains of social risk (e.g., poverty, food insecurity, violence, unemployment, and housing problems). Conclusion There is increasing traction within the medical field for improving social history taking and integrating more formal screening for social determinants of health within clinical practice. There is also a growing number of high-quality evidence-based reviews that identify interventions that are effective in promoting health equity at the individual patient level, and at broader community and structural levels.

          Related collections

          Most cited references70

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency

            Background The scoping review has become an increasingly popular approach for synthesizing research evidence. It is a relatively new approach for which a universal study definition or definitive procedure has not been established. The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of scoping reviews in the literature. Methods A scoping review was conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A search was conducted in four bibliographic databases and the gray literature to identify scoping review studies. Review selection and characterization were performed by two independent reviewers using pretested forms. Results The search identified 344 scoping reviews published from 1999 to October 2012. The reviews varied in terms of purpose, methodology, and detail of reporting. Nearly three-quarter of reviews (74.1%) addressed a health topic. Study completion times varied from 2 weeks to 20 months, and 51% utilized a published methodological framework. Quality assessment of included studies was infrequently performed (22.38%). Conclusions Scoping reviews are a relatively new but increasingly common approach for mapping broad topics. Because of variability in their conduct, there is a need for their methodological standardization to ensure the utility and strength of evidence. © 2014 The Authors. Research Synthesis Methods published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Addressing social determinants of health at well child care visits: a cluster RCT.

              To evaluate the effect of a clinic-based screening and referral system (Well Child Care, Evaluation, Community Resources, Advocacy, Referral, Education [WE CARE]) on families' receipt of community-based resources for unmet basic needs.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Public Health Reviews
                Public Health Rev
                Springer Science and Business Media LLC
                2107-6952
                December 2018
                June 22 2018
                December 2018
                : 39
                : 1
                Article
                10.1186/s40985-018-0094-7
                1b174023-5deb-4812-9f51-470c4fac6332
                © 2018

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article