Inviting an author to review:
Find an author and click ‘Invite to review selected article’ near their name.
Search for authorsSearch for similar articles
14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ten Simple Rules for a successful remote postdoc

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Author summary Postdocs are a critical transition for early-career researchers. This transient period, between finishing a PhD and finding a permanent position, is when early-career researchers develop independent research programs and establish collaborative relationships that can make a successful career. Traditionally, postdocs physically relocate—sometimes multiple times—for these short-term appointments, which creates challenges that can disproportionately affect members of traditionally underrepresented groups in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). However, many research activities involving analytical and quantitative work do not require a physical presence in a lab and can be accomplished remotely. Other fields have embraced remote work, yet many academics have been hesitant to hire remote postdocs. In this article, we present advice to both principal investigators (PIs) and postdocs for successfully navigating a remote position. Using the combined experience of the authors (as either remote postdocs or employers of remote postdocs), we provide a road map to overcome the real (and perceived) obstacles associated with remote work. With planning, communication, and creativity, remote postdocs can be a fully functioning and productive member of a research lab. Further, our rules can be useful for research labs generally and can help foster a more flexible and inclusive environment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references11

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations of Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Candidates

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            When Two Bodies Are (Not) a Problem: Gender and Relationship Status Discrimination in Academic Hiring

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              How the entire scientific community can confront gender bias in the workplace

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                PLOS Computational Biology
                PLoS Comput Biol
                Public Library of Science (PLoS)
                1553-7358
                May 7 2020
                May 7 2020
                : 16
                : 5
                : e1007809
                Article
                10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007809
                136fca45-04c0-4c0d-a62c-14368a5fb2eb
                © 2020

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article