10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Map-A-Mole: Greenspace Area Influences the Presence and Abundance of the European Mole Talpa europaea in Urban Habitats

      research-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Simple Summary

          The European mole is a burrowing mammal which is widely distributed across Britain and much of continental Europe. Its presence is readily confirmed by the presence of molehills, which contain the spoil heaps left behind as the mole digs its underground tunnels. Despite being easy to record, there are very few studies of moles in an urban environment. We asked how area of greenspace (largely parks, recreation areas, nature reserves and playing fields), distance to the nearest patch, human disturbance, how long the green patch had been isolated for, and degree of urban construction around the patch affected mole presence and abundance. We found that patch size affected mole presence, with a minimum greenspace of approximately 10 ha required. Where moles were found, larger patches had more signs of moles and surprisingly, mole abundance was also associated with the degree of urban construction around the greenspace. This result shows how urban planning can affect the presence of unusual species, such as the European mole.

          Abstract

          The European mole Talpa europaea is common across much of Britain. It has a unique fossorial lifestyle, and evidence of its presence is readily identified through the presence of characteristic molehills. Although molehills are often a common sight in urban greenspaces, moles are remarkably understudied, with very few studies to date exploring the urban ecology of moles. Here, we investigate if factors such as greenspace (largely urban parks and playing fields) area, intensity of management, distance to nearest patch, amount of time the patch had been isolated from other green patches, and the amount of urbanization (constructed surfaces) surrounding the patch, influence the distribution and abundance of urban moles. Mole signs (hills and surface runs) were counted in all discrete urban greenspaces (excluding domestic gardens and one private golf course) within an 89.5 km 2 area in the UK town of Reading. We found that 17 out of 59 surveyed sites contained moles, with their presence being recorded in greenspaces with a minimum patch area of approximately 0.1 km 2 (10 ha). Where present, the abundance of mole territories in the greenspaces was associated with both the area of greenspace and degree of urbanization within 150 m of the patch boundary. While the former was not surprising, the latter outcome may be a consequence of sites with an increased risk of flooding being home to fewer moles, and the surrounding area is also less likely to be built upon. This case study highlights how choices made in designing urban green infrastructure will determine which species survive in urban areas long into the future.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Urbanization, Biodiversity, and Conservation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              A global strategy for road building.

              The number and extent of roads will expand dramatically this century. Globally, at least 25 million kilometres of new roads are anticipated by 2050; a 60% increase in the total length of roads over that in 2010. Nine-tenths of all road construction is expected to occur in developing nations, including many regions that sustain exceptional biodiversity and vital ecosystem services. Roads penetrating into wilderness or frontier areas are a major proximate driver of habitat loss and fragmentation, wildfires, overhunting and other environmental degradation, often with irreversible impacts on ecosystems. Unfortunately, much road proliferation is chaotic or poorly planned, and the rate of expansion is so great that it often overwhelms the capacity of environmental planners and managers. Here we present a global scheme for prioritizing road building. This large-scale zoning plan seeks to limit the environmental costs of road expansion while maximizing its benefits for human development, by helping to increase agricultural production, which is an urgent priority given that global food demand could double by mid-century. Our analysis identifies areas with high environmental values where future road building should be avoided if possible, areas where strategic road improvements could promote agricultural development with relatively modest environmental costs, and 'conflict areas' where road building could have sizeable benefits for agriculture but with serious environmental damage. Our plan provides a template for proactively zoning and prioritizing roads during the most explosive era of road expansion in human history.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Animals (Basel)
                Animals (Basel)
                animals
                Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI
                MDPI
                2076-2615
                25 June 2020
                June 2020
                : 10
                : 6
                : 1097
                Affiliations
                [1 ]People and Wildlife Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, Harborne Building, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AS, UK; kojoeah@ 123456live.co.uk (K.A.-H.); eliserocha1@ 123456gmail.com (E.A.R.); t.pirie@ 123456reading.ac.uk (T.J.P.); Rebecca.Thomas@ 123456rhul.ac.uk (R.L.T.)
                [2 ]Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Campus Universitário de Rondonópolis–UFMT, Rodovia Rondonópolis/Guiratinga, Rondonópolis 78736-900, MT, Brazil; fabio_angeoletto@ 123456yahoo.es (F.A.); jeatermaciel@ 123456gmail.com (J.W.M.C.S.); deleon_roo@ 123456hotmail.com (D.d.S.L.)
                [3 ]School of Biological Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: m.fellowes@ 123456reading.ac.uk ; Tel.: +44-118-376-7064
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5431-8637
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3084-3928
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8784-1707
                Article
                animals-10-01097
                10.3390/ani10061097
                7341262
                32630423
                8ef2ff15-165c-44d5-bcb7-c0da4d9eef07
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 07 June 2020
                : 22 June 2020
                Categories
                Article

                urban ecology,urban planning,urban greening,urban biodiversity,mammal,habitat management,species area relationships

                Comments

                Comment on this article