4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Depressed democracy, environmental injustice: Exploring the negative mental health implications of unconventional oil and gas production in the United States

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Highlights

          • U.S. unconventional oil and gas production has proliferated, moving into neighborhoods.

          • Institutional contexts and procedural equity matter for mental health.

          • Interviewees experienced inaccessible information as significant institutional barrier.

          • Interviewees experienced powerlessness to decide how, when, & where production takes place.

          • These 2 institutional barriers structure procedural inequity, amplify negative mental health impacts.

          Abstract

          Unconventional oil and gas (UOG) production has rapidly expanded, making the U.S. the top producer of hydrocarbons. The industrial process now pushes against neighborhoods, schools, and people’s daily lives. I analyze extensive mixed methods data collected over three years in Colorado – including 75 in-depth interviews and additional participant observation – to show how living amid industrial UOG production generates chronic stress and negative mental health outcomes, such as self-reported depression. I show how UOG production has become a neighborhood industrial activity that, in turn, acts as a chronic environmental stressor. I examine two key drivers of chronic stress – uncertainty and powerlessness – and show how these mechanisms relate to state-level institutional processes that generate patterned procedural inequities. This includes inadequate access to transparent environmental and public health information about UOG production’s potential risks and limited public participation in decisions about production, with negative implications for mental health.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Stress, Coping, and Social Support Processes: Where Are We? What Next?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The prevalence, distribution, and mental health correlates of perceived discrimination in the United States.

            The survey data presented here are on the national prevalences of major life-time perceived discrimination and day-to-day perceived discrimination; the associations between perceived discrimination and mental health; and the extent to which differential exposure and differential emotional reactivity to perceived discrimination account for the well-known associations between disadvantaged social status and mental health. Although more prevalent among people with disadvantaged social status, results show that perceived discrimination is common in the total population, with 33.5 percent of respondents in the total sample reporting exposure to major lifetime discrimination and 60.9 percent reporting exposure to day-to-day discrimination. The associations of perceived discrimination with mental health are comparable in magnitude to those of other more commonly studied stressors, and these associations do not vary consistently across subsamples defined on the basis of social status. Even though perceived discrimination explains only a small part of the observed associations between disadvantaged social status and mental health, given its high prevalence, wide distribution, and strong associations with mental health, perceived discrimination needs to be treated much more seriously than in the past in future studies of stress and mental health.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Theorising environmental justice: the expanding sphere of a discourse

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Energy Res Soc Sci
                Energy Res Soc Sci
                Energy Research & Social Science
                Elsevier Ltd.
                2214-6296
                2214-6296
                11 September 2020
                December 2020
                11 September 2020
                : 70
                : 101720
                Affiliations
                Department of Sociology, Colorado State University, United States
                Author notes
                [* ]Address at: B234 Clark Building, Department of Sociology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, United States.
                Article
                S2214-6296(20)30295-4 101720
                10.1016/j.erss.2020.101720
                7486049
                6def5a13-1c58-4185-8a79-c6d0c132c036
                © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

                Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

                History
                : 13 February 2020
                : 15 July 2020
                : 23 July 2020
                Categories
                Article

                hydraulic fracturing,environmental justice,procedural equity,mental health,chronic stress,shale development

                Comments

                Comment on this article