Membranous Glomerulonephritis with Crescents

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

Introduction Membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN) is rarely associated with necrotizing and crescentic glomerulonephritis (NCGN). Methods We report the clinical and pathologic findings in 15 patients with MGN and NCGN associated with anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibodies (ANCAs), anti–glomerular basement membrane (GBM), or anti–phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) antibodies. Results The cohort consisted of 15 patients: 7 males and 8 females with a median age of 63 years (range: 18–79). In 12 of 15 patients, MGN and NCGN were diagnosed at the time of the biopsy, and in 3 cases, MGN predated the NCGN. ANCA was positive in 7 cases (6 MPO myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA and 1 PR3–ANCA), anti-GBM antibodies were detected in 5 cases, and anti-PLA2R antibodies were found in 2 cases. One case was negative for all antibodies. Microscopic hematuria was present in all but one patient who was anuric, and median urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio was 819.5 mg/mmol (range: 88–5600). Pathologic evaluation revealed MGN and NCGN with crescents involving 28% of glomeruli (median; range: 5%–100%). Follow-up was available for all 15 patients; all were treated with steroids; 10 with cyclophosphamide, and 6 also received rituximab. At a median follow-up of 72 months, 9 had stabilization or improvement of renal function, 6 had progressed to end-stage renal disease, and 4 died during the follow-up period. Conclusion MGN with crescents associated with ANCAs or anti-GBM antibodies is a rare dual glomerulopathy. Patients present with heavy proteinuria, microscopic hematuria, and acute kidney injury and should be treated for a rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. Prognosis is variable, and 40% of patients progress to end-stage renal disease.

Related collections

Most cited references 19

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Rituximab for Severe Membranous Nephropathy: A 6-Month Trial with Extended Follow-Up.

Karine Dahan, Hanna Debiec, Emmanuelle Plaisier … (2017)

Randomized trials of rituximab in primary membranous nephropathy (PMN) have not been conducted. We undertook a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial at 31 French hospitals (NCT01508468). Patients with biopsy-proven PMN and nephrotic syndrome after 6 months of nonimmunosuppressive antiproteinuric treatment (NIAT) were randomly assigned to 6-month therapy with NIAT and 375 mg/m(2) intravenous rituximab on days 1 and 8 (n=37) or NIAT alone (n=38). Median times to last follow-up were 17.0 (interquartile range, 12.5-24.0) months and 17.0 (interquartile range, 13.0-23.0) months in NIAT-rituximab and NIAT groups, respectively. Primary outcome was a combined end point of complete or partial remission of proteinuria at 6 months. At month 6, 13 (35.1%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 19.7 to 50.5) patients in the NIAT-rituximab group and eight (21.1%; 95% CI, 8.1 to 34.0) patients in the NIAT group achieved remission (P=0.21). Rates of antiphospholipase A2 receptor antibody (anti-PLA2R-Ab) depletion in NIAT-rituximab and NIAT groups were 14 of 25 (56%) and one of 23 (4.3%) patients at month 3 (P<0.001) and 13 of 26 (50%) and three of 25 (12%) patients at month 6 (P=0.004), respectively. Eight serious adverse events occurred in each group. During the observational phase, remission rates before change of assigned treatment were 24 of 37 (64.9%) and 13 of 38 (34.2%) patients in NIAT-rituximab and NIAT groups, respectively (P<0.01). Positive effect of rituximab on proteinuria remission occurred after 6 months. These data suggest that PLA2R-Ab levels are early markers of rituximab effect and that addition of rituximab to NIAT does not affect safety.

0 comments Cited 150 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Anti-Glomerular Basement Membrane Disease.

Stephen McAdoo, Charles D. Pusey (2017)

Anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease is a rare small vessel vasculitis that affects the capillary beds of the kidneys and lungs. It is an archetypic autoimmune disease, caused by the development of directly pathogenic autoantibodies targeting a well characterized autoantigen expressed in the basement membranes of these organs, although the inciting events that induce the autoimmune response are not fully understood. The recent confirmation of spatial and temporal clustering of cases suggests that environmental factors, including infection, may trigger disease in genetically susceptible individuals. The majority of patients develop widespread glomerular crescent formation, presenting with features of rapidly progressive GN, and 40%-60% will have concurrent alveolar hemorrhage. Treatment aims to rapidly remove pathogenic autoantibody, typically with the use of plasma exchange, along with steroids and cytotoxic therapy to prevent ongoing autoantibody production and tissue inflammation. Retrospective cohort studies suggest that when this combination of treatment is started early, the majority of patients will have good renal outcome, although presentation with oligoanuria, a high proportion of glomerular crescents, or kidney failure requiring dialysis augur badly for renal prognosis. Relapse and recurrent disease after kidney transplantation are both uncommon, although de novo anti-GBM disease after transplantation for Alport syndrome is a recognized phenomenon. Copresentation with other kidney diseases such as ANCA-associated vasculitis and membranous nephropathy seems to occur at a higher frequency than would be expected by chance alone, and in addition atypical presentations of anti-GBM disease are increasingly reported. These observations highlight the need for future work to further delineate the immunopathogenic mechanisms of anti-GBM disease, and how to better refine and improve treatments, particularly for patients presenting with adverse prognostic factors.

0 comments Cited 144 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Safety of Rituximab Compared with Steroids and Cyclophosphamide for Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy.

Jan A.J.G. van den Brand, Piero Ruggenenti, Antonietta Chianca … (2017)

Guidelines recommend steroid plus cyclical cyclophosphamide (St-Cp) therapy for patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy at high risk of progression to ESRD. Rituximab (Rtx) may be a safer alternative. In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we compared time to any adverse event (primary outcome); serious or nonserious events; partial and complete remission of the nephrotic syndrome; and a composite of doubling of serum creatinine, ESRD, or death between 100 Rtx-treated patients and 103 patients who received daily St-Cp We monitored patients with standardized protocols and adjusted for baseline characteristics by Cox regression. Over a median follow-up of 40 months, the Rtx group had significantly fewer adverse events than the St-Cp group (63 versus 173; P<0.001), both serious (11 versus 46; P<0.001) and nonserious (52 versus 127; P<0.001). Cumulative incidence of any first (35.5% versus 69.0%; P<0.001), serious (16.4% versus 30.2%; P=0.002), or nonserious (23.6% versus 60.8%; P<0.001) event was significantly lower with Rtx Adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) between Rtx and St-Cp groups were 0.27 (0.16 to 0.44) for any first adverse event, 0.32 (0.15 to 0.68) for serious adverse events, and 0.23 (0.13 to 0.41) for nonserious adverse events. Although the cumulative incidence of partial remission was lower in the Rtx group, rates of complete remission and the composite renal end point did not differ significantly between groups. Because of its superior safety profile, we suggest that Rtx might replace St-Cp as first-line immunosuppressive therapy in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy and nephrotic syndrome.