68
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      When Competence Is Irrelevant: The Role of Interpersonal Affect in Task-Related Ties

      ,
      Administrative Science Quarterly
      Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness

          Brian Uzzi (1997)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes.

            In the present research, consisting of 2 correlational studies (N = 616) including a representative U.S. sample and 2 experiments (N = 350), the authors investigated how stereotypes and emotions shape behavioral tendencies toward groups, offering convergent support for the behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes (BIAS) map framework. Warmth stereotypes determine active behavioral tendencies, attenuating active harm (harassing) and eliciting active facilitation (helping). Competence stereotypes determine passive behavioral tendencies, attenuating passive harm (neglecting) and eliciting passive facilitation (associating). Admired groups (warm, competent) elicit both facilitation tendencies; hated groups (cold, incompetent) elicit both harm tendencies. Envied groups (competent, cold) elicit passive facilitation but active harm; pitied groups (warm, incompetent) elicit active facilitation but passive harm. Emotions predict behavioral tendencies more strongly than stereotypes do and usually mediate stereotype-to-behavioral-tendency links.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Organizational behavior: affect in the workplace.

              The study of affect in the workplace began and peaked in the 1930s, with the decades that followed up to the 1990s not being particularly fertile. Whereas job satisfaction generally continues to be loosely but not carefully thought of and measured as an affective state, critical work in the 1990s has raised serious questions about the affective status of job satisfaction in terms of its causes as well as its definition and measurement. Recent research has focused on the production of moods and emotions at work, with an emphasis, at least conceptually, on stressful events, leaders, work groups, physical settings, and rewards/punishment. Other recent research has addressed the consequences of workers' feelings, in particular, a variety of performance outcomes (e.g., helping behaviors and creativity). Even though recent interest in affect in the workplace has been intense, many theoretical and methodological opportunities and challenges remain.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Administrative Science Quarterly
                Administrative Science Quarterly
                Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University
                0001-8392
                1930-3815
                December 2008
                December 2008
                : 53
                : 4
                : 655-684
                Article
                10.2189/asqu.53.4.655
                22623da3-0cdd-4bca-a20a-b7e8c3f94f23
                © 2008
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article