Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote cisplatin resistance in bladder cancer cells by increasing IGF-1/ERβ/Bcl-2 signalling

There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

Abstract

While cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumour microenvironment may play important roles in bladder cancer (BCa) progression, their impacts on BCa chemoresistance remain unclear. Using human BCa samples, we found that tumour tissues possessed more CAFs than did adjacent normal tissues. Both the presence of CAFs in the BCa stroma and the expression of ERβ in BCa contribute to chemoresistance, and CAFs and BCa cells interact to affect ERβ expression. In vitro co-culture assays demonstrated that compared with normal bladder cells, BCa cells had a higher capacity to induce the transformation of normal fibroblasts into CAFs. When BCa cells were co-cultured with CAFs, their viability, clone formation ability and chemoresistance were increased, whereas their apoptotic rates were downregulated. Dissection of the mechanism revealed that the recruited CAFs increased IGF-1/ERβ signalling in BCa cells, which then led to the promotion of the expression of the anti-apoptotic gene Bcl-2. Blocking IGF-1/ERβ/Bcl-2 signalling by either an shRNA targeting ERβ or an anti-IGF-1 neutralizing antibody partially reversed the capacity of CAFs to increase BCa chemoresistance. The in vivo data also confirmed that CAFs could increase BCa cell resistance to cisplatin by increasing ERβ/Bcl-2 signalling. The above results showed the important roles of CAFs within the bladder tumour microenvironment, which could enhance BCa chemoresistance.

Related collections

Most cited references 36

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Drug resistance and the solid tumor microenvironment.

Olivier Trédan, Carlos M. Galmarini, Krupa Patel … (2007)

Resistance of human tumors to anticancer drugs is most often ascribed to gene mutations, gene amplification, or epigenetic changes that influence the uptake, metabolism, or export of drugs from single cells. Another important yet little-appreciated cause of anticancer drug resistance is the limited ability of drugs to penetrate tumor tissue and to reach all of the tumor cells in a potentially lethal concentration. To reach all viable cells in the tumor, anticancer drugs must be delivered efficiently through the tumor vasculature, cross the vessel wall, and traverse the tumor tissue. In addition, heterogeneity within the tumor microenvironment leads to marked gradients in the rate of cell proliferation and to regions of hypoxia and acidity, all of which can influence the sensitivity of the tumor cells to drug treatment. In this review, we describe how the tumor microenvironment may be involved in the resistance of solid tumors to chemotherapy and discuss potential strategies to improve the effectiveness of drug treatment by modifying factors relating to the tumor microenvironment.

0 comments Cited 655 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study.

H von der Maase, S W Hansen, J Roberts … (2000)

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) and methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MVAC) were compared in patients with locally advanced or metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium. Patients with stage IV TCC and no prior systemic chemotherapy were randomized to GC (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15; cisplatin 70 mg/m2 day 2) or standard MVAC every 28 days for a maximum of six cycles. Four hundred five patients were randomized (GC, n = 203; MVAC, n = 202). The groups were well-balanced with respect to prognostic factors. Overall survival was similar on both arms (hazards ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.32; P = .75), as were time to progressive disease (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.30), time to treatment failure (HR, 0.89; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.10), and response rate (GC, 49%; MVAC, 46%). More GC patients completed six cycles of therapy, with fewer dose adjustments. The toxic death rate was 1% on the GC arm and 3% on the MVAC arm. More GC than MVAC patients had grade 3/4 anemia (27% v 18%, respectively), and thrombocytopenia (57% v 21%, respectively). On both arms, the RBC transfusion rate was 13 of 100 cycles and grade 3/4 hemorrhage or hematuria was 2%; the platelet transfusion rate was four patients per 100 cycles and two patients per 100 cycles on GC and MVAC, respectively. More MVAC patients, compared with GC patients, had grade 3/4 neutropenia (82% v 71%, respectively), neutropenic fever (14% v 2%, respectively), neutropenic sepsis (12% v 1%, respectively), and grade 3/4 mucositis (22% v 1%, respectively) and alopecia (55% v 11%, respectively). Quality of life was maintained during treatment on both arms; however, more patients on GC fared better regarding weight, performance status, and fatigue. GC provides a similar survival advantage to MVAC with a better safety profile and tolerability. This better-risk benefit ratio should change the standard of care for patients with locally advanced and metastatic TCC from MVAC to GC.

0 comments Cited 455 times – based on 0 reviews      Review now

Bookmark

Record: found
Abstract: found
Article: not found

The insulin and insulin-like growth factor receptor family in neoplasia: an update.

Michael Pollak (2012)

Although several early phase clinical trials raised enthusiasm for the use of insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF1R)-specific antibodies for cancer treatment, initial Phase III results in unselected patients have been disappointing. Further clinical studies may benefit from the use of predictive biomarkers to identify probable responders, the use of rational combination therapies and the consideration of alternative targeting strategies, such as ligand-specific antibodies and receptor-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Targeting insulin and IGF signalling also needs to be considered in the broader context of the pathophysiology that relates obesity and diabetes to neoplasia, and the effects of anti-diabetic drugs, including metformin, on cancer risk and prognosis. The insulin and IGFI receptor family is also relevant to the development of PI3K-AKT pathway inhibitors.