10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Binding and Retrieval of Response Durations: Subtle Evidence for Episodic Processing of Continuous Movement Features

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Re-encountering a stimulus retrieves nominally relevant, categorical response features related to previous action decisions in response to this stimulus. Whether binding and retrieval extend to nominally irrelevant, metric features relating to an actual body movement is unknown, however. In two experiments, we thus tested whether repeating target or distractor stimuli across trials retrieves the irrelevant duration of spatial responses to these stimuli. We found subtle indication of such retrieval by task-relevant target stimuli, suggesting that binding and retrieval also operate on metric features of a motor response. In contrast, there was no sign of binding and retrieval of metric features for distractor stimuli. We discuss these observations regarding the representation of action episodes during action-related decision making and during actual movement initiation and control.

          Related collections

          Most cited references40

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Toward an instance theory of automatization.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Event Files: Evidence for Automatic Integration of Stimulus-Response Episodes

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning.

              Traditional approaches to human information processing tend to deal with perception and action planning in isolation, so that an adequate account of the perception-action interface is still missing. On the perceptual side, the dominant cognitive view largely underestimates, and thus fails to account for, the impact of action-related processes on both the processing of perceptual information and on perceptual learning. On the action side, most approaches conceive of action planning as a mere continuation of stimulus processing, thus failing to account for the goal-directedness of even the simplest reaction in an experimental task. We propose a new framework for a more adequate theoretical treatment of perception and action planning, in which perceptual contents and action plans are coded in a common representational medium by feature codes with distal reference. Perceived events (perceptions) and to-be-produced events (actions) are equally represented by integrated, task-tuned networks of feature codes--cognitive structures we call event codes. We give an overview of evidence from a wide variety of empirical domains, such as spatial stimulus-response compatibility, sensorimotor synchronization, and ideomotor action, showing that our main assumptions are well supported by the data.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Cogn
                J Cogn
                2514-4820
                Journal of Cognition
                Ubiquity Press
                2514-4820
                07 April 2022
                2022
                : 5
                : 1
                : 23
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, DE
                [2 ]Media Informatics Group, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, DE
                [3 ]Cognitive Psychology, University of Trier, Trier, DE
                Author notes
                CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Roland Pfister Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, DE roland.pfister@ 123456psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4429-1052
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-6529
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8520-4672
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6256-8011
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6179-2214
                Article
                10.5334/joc.212
                9400643
                36072101
                00b256af-82fc-4da3-ad46-f0301c81f3da
                Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 01 September 2021
                : 21 February 2022
                Categories
                Research Article

                feature binding,stimulus-response binding,metric features,action control

                Comments

                Comment on this article