2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Urinary Sediment Profile in Proliferative and Nonproliferative Glomerulonephritis by Bright-Field and Phase-Contrast Microscopy

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sir, We report herein a study demonstrating the value of urine sediment profile in distinguishing proliferative glomerulonephritis (PGN) from nonproliferative glomerulonephritis (NPGN). This distinction is of clinical importance as it helps the nephrologist recognize PGNs which usually need urgent attention and a biopsy on priority. The study included 129 biopsy proven cases, 57 of PGN and 72 of NPGN. The urine sample in each case was collected prior to the biopsy, processed according to the meticulous protocol, and all cells and casts in the sediment were semiquantitatively scored according to the method proposed by Fogazzi.[1] The sediment was examined by bright-field, polarizing, and phase contrast microscopy in all cases. The latter is of particular importance in recognizing dysmorphic RBCs, which were reported as a percentage of the total RBCs. The results of the study are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 P value of urine particles in proliferative glomerulonephritis and nonproliferative glomerulonephritis: Quantitative analysis Particles PGN NPGN P RBCs 45.80±3159.10 10.88±457.43 <0.001 WBCs 11.04±373.647 4.12±45.89 <0.001 RTECs 1.44±1.88 1.09±1.87 0.294 WBC casts 0.11±0.10 0.1±0.50 0.46 RBC casts 0.06±0.01 0.006±0.0008 <0.001 Fatty casts 0.05±0.02 0.03±0.015 0.55 RTE casts 1.44±3.55 1.09±3.51 <0.001 Granular casts 3.102±5.41 1.56±4.86 0.091 PGN: Proliferative glomerulonephritis, NPGN: Nonproliferative glomerulonephritis, RBCs: Red blood cells, WBCs: White blood cells, RTECs: Renal tubular epithelial cells RBCs, dysmorphic RBCs, WBCs, RBC casts, and renal tubular epithelial casts were significantly higher in PGN. A discriminant analysis with the dependent variables being PGN and NPGN and the independent variables being RBC, WBC, and RBC casts yielded a sensitivity of 91.23% and specificity of 58.33% in our study, whilst that done by Fogazzi et al.[2] yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 80.8% and 79.2%, respectively. Dysmorphic RBCs have long been considered a hallmark of glomerular hematuria. The percentage of dysmorphic RBCs used as a cutoff has varied from as low as 20%[3] to as high as 90%.[4 5] In this study, a cutoff of >40% dysmorphic RBCs had a sensitivity of 91.2% and a specificity of 79.17% in distinguishing PGN from NPGN. In summary, urine sediment analysis when accurately performed is of value in predicting the type of glomerulopathy. As dysmorphic RBCs are seen in nonproliferative GN also, a cutoff of 40% can be used as a screening procedure to recognize proliferative GN which need urgent clinical attention and biopsies. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references4

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Urinary sediment features in proliferative and non-proliferative glomerular diseases.

          The studies on urine sediment particles in patients with glomerular diseases (GD) are few and have focused only on single urine particles. In this study, we investigated the prevalence and number of 12 urine sediment particles in two groups of patients, one with proliferative GD, and the other with non-proliferative GD. The urine sediment of 100 consecutive patients, with a renal biopsy-proven proliferative or non-proliferative GD and marked cylindruria, were examined a few hours before renal biopsy according to a standardized method. The urine particles investigated were erythrocytes, leukocytes, renal tubular cells, lipids and hyaline, hyaline-granular, granular, waxy, erythrocytic, leukocytic, epithelial and fatty casts. Patients with proliferative GD (n=52) had both a significantly higher prevalence of microscopic hematuria, leukocyturia, tubular epithelial cells, erythrocytic casts, epithelial casts, and significantly higher amounts of erythrocytes,leukocytes, tubular epithelial cells/20 high power field (HPF), erythrocytic and epithelial casts. On the other hand, patients with non-proliferative GD (n=48) had significantly higher numbers of fatty casts. In proliferative GD, leukocyturia was associated with intracapillary and extracapillary proliferation, crescents and fibrinoid necrosis at renal biopsy. At discriminant analysis, the two types of GD could be identified with 80.8% sensitivity and 79.2% specificity. By multiple logistic regression analysis, patients with erythrocytes, leukocytes and erythrocytic casts in the urine had an odds ratio (OR) of 9.91 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.01-97.51), 7.85 (95% CI: 2.77-22.20), and 4.33 (95% CI: 1.41-13.31), respectively, of having proliferative GD. Our examination of the urine sediment shows that proliferative GD and non-proliferative GD differ in many respects.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phase contrast microscopic examination of urinary erythrocytes to localise source of bleeding: an overlooked technique?

            To localise the source of bleeding in the urinary tract in patients presenting with haematuria.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              Phase Contrast Microscopy of the Urine Sediment for the Diagnosis of Glomerular and Nonglomerular Bleeding-Data in Children and Adults with Normal Creatinine Clearance

              In a pediatric and in an adult group of patients with hematuria and normal creatinine clearance overnight urine examination was carried out on 2 nonconsecutive days by means of phase contrast microscopy by two independent observers working in two different institutions. In this way it was possible to distinguish between patients on the basis of dysmorphic (glomerular) and isomorphic (nonglomerular) red cells in urine and to correlate the findings with the final diagnosis. A clear-cut indication (more than 80% of isomorphic and/or dysmorphic red cells) was obtained in 163 patients (102 of pediatric age) and final diagnosis of hematuria correlated with red-cell microscopy findings in 96.4% of glomerular diseases and in all cases of nonglomerular origin. Mixed hematuria (50–75% of dysmorphic red cells) was found in 2 cases of renal tuberculosis, 2 cases of polycystic kidney disease and in 1 child with viral meningoencephalitis with a bladder stone. The data indicate that the method is safe and accurate but further experience must be gathered for the many etiologies of glomerular and nonglomerular diseases hitherto not studied.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Nephrol
                Indian J Nephrol
                IJN
                Indian Journal of Nephrology
                Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd (India )
                0971-4065
                1998-3662
                Mar-Apr 2019
                : 29
                : 2
                : 148
                Affiliations
                [1] Department of Histopathology, Apollo Hospitals, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, India
                [1 ] Department of Clinical Pathology, Apollo Hospitals, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad, India
                Author notes
                Address for correspondence: Dr. S. Gowrishankar, Department of Histopathology, 6 th Floor, Health Street Building, Apollo Hospitals, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad - 500 096, India. E-mail: swarnalatag@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                IJN-29-148
                10.4103/ijn.IJN_37_18
                6440329
                01192d9f-2726-447a-af0d-53646293b249
                Copyright: © 2019 Indian Journal of Nephrology

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                Categories
                Letters to Editor

                Nephrology
                Nephrology

                Comments

                Comment on this article