37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Predictions not commands: active inference in the motor system

      review-article
      , ,  
      Brain Structure & Function
      Springer-Verlag
      Active inference, Free energy, Hierarchy, Motor control, Reflexes

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The descending projections from motor cortex share many features with top-down or backward connections in visual cortex; for example, corticospinal projections originate in infragranular layers, are highly divergent and (along with descending cortico-cortical projections) target cells expressing NMDA receptors. This is somewhat paradoxical because backward modulatory characteristics would not be expected of driving motor command signals. We resolve this apparent paradox using a functional characterisation of the motor system based on Helmholtz’s ideas about perception; namely, that perception is inference on the causes of visual sensations. We explain behaviour in terms of inference on the causes of proprioceptive sensations. This explanation appeals to active inference, in which higher cortical levels send descending proprioceptive predictions, rather than motor commands. This process mirrors perceptual inference in sensory cortex, where descending connections convey predictions, while ascending connections convey prediction errors. The anatomical substrate of this recurrent message passing is a hierarchical system consisting of functionally asymmetric driving (ascending) and modulatory (descending) connections: an arrangement that we show is almost exactly recapitulated in the motor system, in terms of its laminar, topographic and physiological characteristics. This perspective casts classical motor reflexes as minimising prediction errors and may provide a principled explanation for why motor cortex is agranular.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          +44-207-8337454 , +44-207-813-1445 , rick.adams@ucl.ac.uk
          Journal
          Brain Struct Funct
          Brain Struct Funct
          Brain Structure & Function
          Springer-Verlag (Berlin/Heidelberg )
          1863-2653
          1863-2661
          6 November 2012
          6 November 2012
          May 2013
          : 218
          : 3
          : 611-643
          Affiliations
          [ ]The Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
          [ ]UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, Bath Street, London, EC1V 9EL UK
          Article
          475
          10.1007/s00429-012-0475-5
          3637647
          23129312
          0153ae89-63be-40a0-9c07-9cf492579f8a
          © The Author(s) 2012
          History
          : 25 January 2012
          : 25 October 2012
          Categories
          Review
          Custom metadata
          © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

          Neurology
          active inference,free energy,hierarchy,motor control,reflexes
          Neurology
          active inference, free energy, hierarchy, motor control, reflexes

          Comments

          Comment on this article