1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Interventions After First Post-Transplant Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Proposed Decision Framework

      discussion

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after organ transplant. Many patients subsequently develop multiple CSCC following a first CSCC, and the risk of metastasis and death is significantly increased compared to the general population. Post-transplant CSCC represents a disease at the interface of dermatology and transplant medicine. Both systemic chemoprevention and modulation of immunosuppression are frequently employed in patients with multiple CSCC, yet there is little consensus on their use after first CSCC to reduce risk of subsequent tumors. While relatively few controlled trials have been undertaken, extrapolation of observational data suggests the most effective interventions may be at the time of first CSCC. We review the need for intervention after a first post-transplant CSCC and evidence for use of various approaches as secondary prevention, before discussing barriers preventing engagement with this approach and finally highlight areas for future research. Close collaboration between specialties to ensure prompt deployment of these interventions after a first CSCC may improve patient outcomes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references78

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A Phase 3 Randomized Trial of Nicotinamide for Skin-Cancer Chemoprevention.

          Nonmelanoma skin cancers, such as basal-cell carcinoma and squamous-cell carcinoma, are common cancers that are caused principally by ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Nicotinamide (vitamin B3) has been shown to have protective effects against damage caused by UV radiation and to reduce the rate of new premalignant actinic keratoses.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Effect of long-term immunosuppression in kidney-graft recipients on cancer incidence: randomised comparison of two cyclosporin regimens.

            Long-term administration of cyclosporin carries a risk of renal toxicity, and immunosuppressants are associated with an increased rate of malignant disorders. We undertook an open randomised study of the risks and benefits of two long-term maintenance regimens of cyclosporin in kidney-allograft recipients. The primary endpoint was graft function; secondary endpoints were survival and occurrence of cancer and rejection. 231 recipients of a first allograft with at most one previous rejection episode were randomised 1 year after transplantation. Most were receiving cyclosporin and azathioprine. One group received cyclosporin doses adjusted to yield trough blood concentrations of 75-125 ng/mL (low-dose group); the second received doses that yielded trough concentrations of 150-250 ng/mL (normal-dose group). Analysis was by intention to treat. At 66 months' follow-up, the low-dose and normal-dose groups were similar in mean serum creatinine (182 [SD 160] vs 184 [157] micromol/L; p=0.9) and mean creatinine clearance (47.5 [25.1] vs 45.3 (22.5] mL/min; p=0.6). Nine of 116 patients in the low-dose group and one of 115 in the normal-dose group had symptoms of rejection (p<0.02). There was no difference between the low-dose and normal-dose groups in survival (95 vs 92%; p=0.7) or graft survival (89 vs 82%; p=0.17) at 6 years. 60 patients developed cancers, 37 in the normal-dose group and 23 in the low-dose group (p<0.034); 66% were skin cancers (26 vs 17; p<0.05). We found no evidence that halving of trough blood cyclosporin concentrations significantly changes graft function or graft survival. The low-dose regimen was associated with fewer malignant disorders but more frequent rejection. The design of long-term maintenance protocols for transplant recipients based on powerful immunosuppressant combinations should take these potential risks into account.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The genomic landscape of cutaneous SCC reveals drivers and a novel azathioprine associated mutational signature

              Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) has a high tumour mutational burden (50 mutations per megabase DNA pair). Here, we combine whole-exome analyses from 40 primary cSCC tumours, comprising 20 well-differentiated and 20 moderately/poorly differentiated tumours, with accompanying clinical data from a longitudinal study of immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients and integrate this analysis with independent gene expression studies. We identify commonly mutated genes, copy number changes and altered pathways and processes. Comparisons with tumour differentiation status suggest events which may drive disease progression. Mutational signature analysis reveals the presence of a novel signature (signature 32), whose incidence correlates with chronic exposure to the immunosuppressive drug azathioprine. Characterisation of a panel of 15 cSCC tumour-derived cell lines reveals that they accurately reflect the mutational signatures and genomic alterations of primary tumours and provide a valuable resource for the validation of tumour drivers and therapeutic targets.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Transpl Int
                Transpl Int
                Transpl Int
                Transplant International
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                0934-0874
                1432-2277
                22 November 2022
                2022
                : 35
                : 10880
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Oxford Institute (CAMS-COI) , Nuffield Department of Medicine , University of Oxford , Oxford, United Kingdom
                [2] 2 Oxford Transplant Unit , Oxford University Hospitals , NHS Foundation Trust , Oxford, United Kingdom
                [3] 3 Cheyenne Skin Clinic , Cheyenne, WY, United States
                [4] 4 Department of Renal Medicine and Transplantation , Barts Health NHS Trust , London, United Kingdom
                [5] 5 Department of Medicine , University of Virginia , Charlottesville, VA, United States
                [6] 6 Department of Dermatology , School of Medicine, John Hopkins University , Baltimore, MD, United States
                [7] 7 Department of Dermatology , Leiden University Medical Centre , Leiden, Netherlands
                [8] 8 Division of Dermatology , Department of Internal Medicine , Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin , Austin, TX, United States
                [9] 9 Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research , Blizard Institute , Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry , Queen Mary University of London , London, United Kingdom
                Author notes
                *Correspondence: Matthew J. Bottomley, matthew.bottomley@ 123456ndm.ox.ac.uk
                [ † ]

                These authors have contributed equally to this work

                Article
                10880
                10.3389/ti.2022.10880
                9722441
                36484063
                01843928-edc3-4cf1-a747-61559b54b3e3
                Copyright © 2022 Bottomley, Massey, Thuraisingham, Doyle, Rao, Bibee, Bouwes Bavinck, Jambusaria-Pahlajani and Harwood.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 01 September 2022
                : 10 November 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences , doi 10.13039/501100005150;
                Funded by: British Skin Foundation , doi 10.13039/501100000296;
                Categories
                Health Archive
                Point of View

                Transplantation
                cancer,outcomes,transplant,skin cancer,management
                Transplantation
                cancer, outcomes, transplant, skin cancer, management

                Comments

                Comment on this article