0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tamsulosin vs. Tadalafil as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Purpose:

          Medical expulsive therapy (MET) is recommended for distal ureteral stones from 5 to 10 mm. The best drug for MET is still uncertain. In this review, we aim to compare the effectiveness of tadalafil and tamsulosin for distal ureteral stones from 5 to 10 mm in terms of stone expulsion rate (SER), stone expulsion time (SET) and the side effect profile.

          Materials and methods:

          A comprehensive literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science, from inception until April 2023. Only randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis.

          Results:

          Eleven publications with 1,330 patients were included. We observed that tadalafil has a higher SER (OR 0.55, CI 95% 0.38;0.80, p=0.02, I2=52%) and the same efficacy in SET (MD 1.07, CI 95% -0.25; 2.39, p=0.11, I2=84%). No differences were found when comparing side effects as headache, backache, dizziness, and orthostatic hypotension.

          Conclusion:

          Tadalafil has a higher stone expulsion rate than tamsulosin as a medical expulsive therapy for patients with distal stones from 5 to 10 mm without differences in side effects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis.

            There are two popular statistical models for meta-analysis, the fixed-effect model and the random-effects model. The fact that these two models employ similar sets of formulas to compute statistics, and sometimes yield similar estimates for the various parameters, may lead people to believe that the models are interchangeable. In fact, though, the models represent fundamentally different assumptions about the data. The selection of the appropriate model is important to ensure that the various statistics are estimated correctly. Additionally, and more fundamentally, the model serves to place the analysis in context. It provides a framework for the goals of the analysis as well as for the interpretation of the statistics. In this paper we explain the key assumptions of each model, and then outline the differences between the models. We conclude with a discussion of factors to consider when choosing between the two models. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I.

              This Guideline is intended to provide a clinical framework for the surgical management of patients with kidney and/or ureteral stones. The summary presented herein represents Part I of the two-part series dedicated to Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. Please refer to Part II for an in-depth discussion of patients presenting with ureteral or renal stones.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int Braz J Urol
                Int Braz J Urol
                ibju
                International Brazilian Journal of Urology : Official Journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
                Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
                1677-5538
                1677-6119
                07 February 2024
                Nov-Dec 2023
                : 49
                : 6
                : 668-676
                Affiliations
                [1 ] orgnameUniversidade de São Paulo orgdiv1Departamento de Técnica Cirúrgica São Paulo SP Brasil originalDepartamento de Técnica Cirúrgica, Universidade de São Paulo - USP, São Paulo, SP, Brasil;
                [2 ] orgnameUniversidade Nove de Julho orgdiv1Departamento de Urologia São Paulo SP Brasil originalDepartamento de Urologia, Universidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
                [3 ] orgnameServiço de Urologia Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz São Paulo SP Brasil originalServiço de Urologia Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
                Author notes
                Correspondence address: Jose Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz, MD Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 São Paulo, SP, 01246-903, Brasil Telephone +55 11 9 7371-1242 E-mail: arnaldoshiomi@yahoo.com.br

                CONFLICT OF INTEREST

                None declared.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6599-7548
                Article
                S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0345
                10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0345
                10947629
                37903004
                019645f0-5dbf-4091-897a-efab62899fed

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 26 July 2023
                : 26 August 2023
                : 25 September 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 25, Pages: 9
                Categories
                Review Article

                tadalafil,adrenergic alpha-antagonists,tamsulosin,meta-analysis as topic

                Comments

                Comment on this article