10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sex Differences in Lifestyle Behaviors among U.S. College Freshmen

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Within lifestyle behavior research, the sex of populations causes differences in behaviors and outcomes of studies. This cross-sectional study investigated lifestyle behavior patterns in college students, examining sex differences in four areas: Nutrition, physical activity, sleep, and stress. Data from over 1100 college freshmen across 8 United States universities were used for this cross-sectional analysis. Self-reported data assessed fruit and vegetable intake, fat percent intake, physical activity, perceived stress, and sleep quality. Statistical analysis included Pearson chi-squared and Mann–Whitney’s U tests for scores by sex. Likewise, healthy cut-offs were used to determine frequency of participants within range of the five tools. Males reported higher intake of both fruits and vegetables, and percent energy from fat than females. Males also reported higher physical activity levels, lower stress levels, and poorer sleep quality than females. Of the five self-reported tools, males were found to have a larger frequency of participants with healthy ranges than females. In a large college freshmen sample, sex was found to be related to general lifestyle behaviors which strengthen results reported in the previous literature. These findings shed light on the need for lifestyle behavior interventions among at-risk college students to enhance their behaviors to healthy levels.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Further Psychometric Support for the 10-Item Version of the Perceived Stress Scale

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sex differences in sleep: impact of biological sex and sex steroids

            Men and women sleep differently. While much is known about the mechanisms that drive sleep, the reason for these sex differences in sleep behaviour is unknown and understudied. Historically, women and female animals are underrepresented in studies of sleep and its disorders. Nevertheless, there is a growing recognition of sex disparities in sleep and rhythm disorders. Women typically report poorer quality and more disrupted sleep across various stages of life. Findings from clinical and basic research studies strongly implicate a role for sex steroids in sleep modulation. Understanding how neuroendocrine mediators and sex differences influence sleep is central to advancing our understanding of sleep-related disorders. The investigation into sex differences and sex steroid modulation of sleep is in its infancy. Identifying the mechanisms underlying sex and gender differences in sleep will provide valuable insights leading to tailored therapeutics that benefit each sex. The goal of this review is to discuss our current understanding of how biological sex and sex steroids influence sleep behaviour from both the clinical and pre-clinical perspective.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report.

              Development of the doubly-labeled water method has made it possible to test the validity of dietary intake instruments for the measurement of energy intake. Comparisons of measured energy expenditure with energy intake from either weighed or estimated dietary records against energy expenditure have indicated that obese subjects, female endurance athletes, and adolescents underestimate habitual and actual energy intake. Individual underestimates of 50% are not uncommon. Even in non-obese adults, where bias is minimal, the standard deviation for individual errors in energy intake approaches 20%. Two investigations of the validity of self-reported dietary records for measuring change in dietary intake also indicate large underestimates of the actual change. Because of bias and imprecision, self-reported energy intakes should be interpreted with caution unless independent methods of assessing their validity are included in the experimental design.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                07 February 2019
                February 2019
                : 16
                : 3
                : 482
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design, Division of Animal & Nutritional Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA; mbarr6@ 123456mix.wvu.edu
                [2 ]Clinical & Translational Science, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA; ccharlie@ 123456hsc.wvu.edu
                [3 ]Department of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 125 Fogarty Hall, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA; gwg@ 123456uri.edu
                [4 ]Department of Business Analytics and Statistics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA; wzhou4@ 123456utk.edu
                [5 ]Department of Nutrition, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA; scolby1@ 123456utk.edu
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-3891
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6332-215X
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0352-1314
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2346-8151
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-3690
                Article
                ijerph-16-00482
                10.3390/ijerph16030482
                6388375
                30736399
                0276b67b-6377-48ff-8e86-e87ec9b4678d
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 04 January 2019
                : 03 February 2019
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                sex differences,health behaviors,self-report,freshmen,college
                Public health
                sex differences, health behaviors, self-report, freshmen, college

                Comments

                Comment on this article