11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Mechanisms of Chemotherapy-Induced Neurotoxicity

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Since the first clinical trials conducted after World War II, chemotherapeutic drugs have been extensively used in the clinic as the main cancer treatment either alone or as an adjuvant therapy before and after surgery. Although the use of chemotherapeutic drugs improved the survival of cancer patients, these drugs are notorious for causing many severe side effects that significantly reduce the efficacy of anti-cancer treatment and patients’ quality of life. Many widely used chemotherapy drugs including platinum-based agents, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, proteasome inhibitors, and thalidomide analogs may cause direct and indirect neurotoxicity. In this review we discuss the main effects of chemotherapy on the peripheral and central nervous systems, including neuropathic pain, chemobrain, enteric neuropathy, as well as nausea and emesis. Understanding mechanisms involved in chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity is crucial for the development of drugs that can protect the nervous system, reduce symptoms experienced by millions of patients, and improve the outcome of the treatment and patients’ quality of life.

          Related collections

          Most cited references370

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2019

          The number of cancer survivors continues to increase in the United States because of the growth and aging of the population as well as advances in early detection and treatment. To assist the public health community in better serving these individuals, the American Cancer Society and the National Cancer Institute collaborate every 3 years to estimate cancer prevalence in the United States using incidence and survival data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries; vital statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Center for Health Statistics; and population projections from the US Census Bureau. Current treatment patterns based on information in the National Cancer Data Base are presented for the most prevalent cancer types. Cancer-related and treatment-related short-term, long-term, and late health effects are also briefly described. More than 16.9 million Americans (8.1 million males and 8.8 million females) with a history of cancer were alive on January 1, 2019; this number is projected to reach more than 22.1 million by January 1, 2030 based on the growth and aging of the population alone. The 3 most prevalent cancers in 2019 are prostate (3,650,030), colon and rectum (776,120), and melanoma of the skin (684,470) among males, and breast (3,861,520), uterine corpus (807,860), and colon and rectum (768,650) among females. More than one-half (56%) of survivors were diagnosed within the past 10 years, and almost two-thirds (64%) are aged 65 years or older. People with a history of cancer have unique medical and psychosocial needs that require proactive assessment and management by follow-up care providers. Although there are growing numbers of tools that can assist patients, caregivers, and clinicians in navigating the various phases of cancer survivorship, further evidence-based resources are needed to optimize care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cellular senescence: when bad things happen to good cells.

            Cells continually experience stress and damage from exogenous and endogenous sources, and their responses range from complete recovery to cell death. Proliferating cells can initiate an additional response by adopting a state of permanent cell-cycle arrest that is termed cellular senescence. Understanding the causes and consequences of cellular senescence has provided novel insights into how cells react to stress, especially genotoxic stress, and how this cellular response can affect complex organismal processes such as the development of cancer and ageing.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mechanisms underlying inflammation in neurodegeneration.

              Inflammation is associated with many neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and multiple sclerosis. In this Review, we discuss inducers, sensors, transducers, and effectors of neuroinflammation that contribute to neuronal dysfunction and death. Although inducers of inflammation may be generated in a disease-specific manner, there is evidence for a remarkable convergence in the mechanisms responsible for the sensing, transduction, and amplification of inflammatory processes that result in the production of neurotoxic mediators. A major unanswered question is whether pharmacological inhibition of inflammation pathways will be able to safely reverse or slow the course of disease. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Pharmacol
                Front Pharmacol
                Front. Pharmacol.
                Frontiers in Pharmacology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1663-9812
                28 March 2022
                2022
                : 13
                : 750507
                Affiliations
                [1] 1 Laboratory of Molecular Oncology and Innovative Therapies , Military Institute of Medicine , Warsaw, Poland
                [2] 2 Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine , Medical University of Warsaw , Warsaw, Poland
                [3] 3 Área de Farmacología y Nutrición , Departamento de Ciencias Básicas de la Salud , Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC) , Alcorcón, Spain
                [4] 4 High Performance Research Group in Experimental Pharmacology (PHARMAKOM-URJC) , URJC , Alcorcón, Spain
                [5] 5 Unidad Asociada I+D+i del Instituto de Química Médica (IQM) , Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) , Madrid, Spain
                [6] 6 School of Biomedical Sciences , The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
                [7] 7 The Laboratory Animal Services Centre , The Chinese University of Hong Kong , Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
                [8] 8 Institute for Health and Sport , Victoria University , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                [9] 9 Department of Medicine Western Health , University of Melbourne , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                [10] 10 Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cells Program , Australian Institute for Musculoskeletal Science (AIMSS) , Melbourne, VIC, Australia
                [11] 11 High Performance Research Group in Physiopathology and Pharmacology of the Digestive System (NeuGut-URJC) , URJC , Alcorcón, Spain
                [12] 12 Grupo de Trabajo de Ciencias Básicas en Dolor y Analgesia de la Sociedad Española del Dolor , Madrid, Spain
                Author notes

                Edited by: David A. Gewirtz, Virginia Commonwealth University, United States

                Reviewed by: M. Imad Damaj, Virginia Commonwealth University, United States

                Sahil Sharma, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, United States

                Martial Caillaud, Université de Nantes, France

                *Correspondence: Raquel Abalo, raquel.abalo@ 123456urjc.es

                This article was submitted to Pharmacology of Anti-Cancer Drugs, a section of the journal Frontiers in Pharmacology

                Article
                750507
                10.3389/fphar.2022.750507
                8996259
                35418856
                02f51d96-f20b-40b8-8183-65159c98f546
                Copyright © 2022 Was, Borkowska, Bagues, Tu, Liu, Lu, Rudd, Nurgali and Abalo.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 30 July 2021
                : 02 March 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: Narodowym Centrum Nauki , doi 10.13039/501100004442;
                Funded by: Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny , doi 10.13039/501100017244;
                Funded by: Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades , doi 10.13039/100014440;
                Categories
                Pharmacology
                Review

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                chemotherapy,neurotoxicity,chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (cipn),chemobrain,enteric neuropathy,chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (cinv)

                Comments

                Comment on this article