+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Effect of Prolonged Subcutaneous Implantation of Peritoneal Catheter on Peritonitis Rate during CAPD: A Prospective Randomized Study

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          We conducted a prospective randomized controlled study to confirm our earlier observation that prolonged subcutaneous implantation of peritoneal catheter reduced peritonitis rate when compared to retrospective data from patients with catheters placed by conventional access technique. A total of 60 patients were randomized into two groups: 30 patients had catheters left implanted subcutaneously for 6 weeks (I) and the other 30 patients had catheters inserted by conventional technique and had 6 weeks of break-in period (C). Subgroups of 15 patients each with new and conventional techniques used Y-connector (IY, CY) and remaining patients used standard spikes (IS, CS).Mean age was 47.7 years (range 16–71); 61.0% were male and 44.1% diabetics. Peritonitis, exit site infection, simultaneous peritonitis and exit site infection, and complication related to Staphylococcus or Pseudomonas infections were observed for up to 2 years in each patient after initiation of bag exchange or until termination of CAPD by transfer to hemodialysis or by death.Total duration of observation was 493.2 patient-months for new access technique and 409.6 patient-months for conventional technique. Patients in IY group had the lowest incidence of peritonitis (1/14.9 patient-months) and exit site infection (1/16.8 patient-months) among four subgroups. Peritonitis rate in IY was significantly lower compared to CY or CS. The total peritonitis-free period in those patients who did not experience peritonitis during the observation period was also significantly longer in IY (120 patient-months) than in CY (26 patient-months), IS (10.6 patient-months), or CS (10.4 patient-months). Simultaneous peritonitis and exit site infection was observed in none of IY group but 3 episodes in CY, 4 episodes in IS, and 3 episodes in CS. The rates of complications related to Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas infections were also significantly lower in IY than in CY, IS, or CS. Technique survival did not differ between the two groups.The present results confirm our previous observation that the new access technique reduces the incidence of peritonitis probably by reducing infection via periluminal route. The Y-connector system further reduces peritonitis rate by reducing infection via intraluminal route.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Blood Purif
          Blood Purification
          S. Karger AG
          June 1998
          08 July 1998
          : 16
          : 3
          : 171-178
          Hyonam Kidney Laboratory, Soon Chun Hyang University, Seoul, Korea
          14331 Blood Purif 1998;16:171–178
          © 1998 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 8
          Self URI (application/pdf): https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/14331
          Original Paper


          Comment on this article