12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Checklist for Implementing Rural Pathways to Train, Develop and Support Health Workers in Low and Middle-Income Countries

      brief-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: There is an urgent need to scale up global action on rural workforce development. This World Health Organization-sponsored research aimed to develop a Rural Pathways Checklist. Its purpose was to guide the practical implementation of rural workforce training, development, and support strategies in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). It was intended for any LMICs, stakeholder, health worker, context, or health problem.

          Method: Multi-methods involved: (1) focus group concept testing; (2) a policy analysis; (3) a scoping review of LMIC literature; (4) consultation with a global Expert Reference Group and; (5) field-testing over an 18-month period.

          Results: The Checklist included eight actions for implementing rural pathways in LMICs: establishing community needs; policies and partners; exploring existing workers and scope; selecting health workers; education and training; working conditions for recruitment and retention; accreditation and recognition of workers; professional support/up-skilling and; monitoring and evaluation. For each action, a summary of LMICs-specific evidence and prompts was developed to stimulate reflection and learning. To support implementation, rural pathways exemplars from different WHO regions were also compiled. Field-testing showed the Checklist is fit for purpose to guide holistic planning and benchmarking of rural pathways, irrespective of LMICs, stakeholder, or health worker type.

          Conclusion: The Rural Pathways Checklist provides an agreed global conceptual framework for the practical implementation of “grow your own” strategies in LMICs. It can be applied to scale-up activity for rural workforce training and development in LMICs, where health workers are most limited and health needs are greatest.

          Related collections

          Most cited references126

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.

            The scoping review has become increasingly popular as a form of knowledge synthesis. However, a lack of consensus on scoping review terminology, definition, methodology, and reporting limits the potential of this form of synthesis. In this article, we propose recommendations to further advance the field of scoping review methodology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Which intervention design factors influence performance of community health workers in low- and middle-income countries? A systematic review

              Community health workers (CHWs) are increasingly recognized as an integral component of the health workforce needed to achieve public health goals in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Many factors influence CHW performance. A systematic review was conducted to identify intervention design related factors influencing performance of CHWs. We systematically searched six databases for quantitative and qualitative studies that included CHWs working in promotional, preventive or curative primary health services in LMICs. One hundred and forty studies met the inclusion criteria, were quality assessed and double read to extract data relevant to the design of CHW programmes. A preliminary framework containing factors influencing CHW performance and characteristics of CHW performance (such as motivation and competencies) guided the literature search and review. A mix of financial and non-financial incentives, predictable for the CHWs, was found to be an effective strategy to enhance performance, especially of those CHWs with multiple tasks. Performance-based financial incentives sometimes resulted in neglect of unpaid tasks. Intervention designs which involved frequent supervision and continuous training led to better CHW performance in certain settings. Supervision and training were often mentioned as facilitating factors, but few studies tested which approach worked best or how these were best implemented. Embedment of CHWs in community and health systems was found to diminish workload and increase CHW credibility. Clearly defined CHW roles and introduction of clear processes for communication among different levels of the health system could strengthen CHW performance. When designing community-based health programmes, factors that increased CHW performance in comparable settings should be taken into account. Additional intervention research to develop a better evidence base for the most effective training and supervision mechanisms and qualitative research to inform policymakers in development of CHW interventions are needed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front Med (Lausanne)
                Front. Med.
                Frontiers in Medicine
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2296-858X
                27 November 2020
                2020
                : 7
                : 594728
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Faculty of Medicine, Rural Clinical School, University of Queensland , Toowoomba, QLD, Australia
                [2] 2Faculty of Medicine, Rural Clinical School, University of Queensland , Theodore, QLD, Australia
                [3] 3Keele Medical School, Keele University , Keele, United Kingdom
                [4] 4Ukwanda Center for Rural Health, Department of Global Health, Stellenbosch University , Cape Town, South Africa
                [5] 5Medical Education and Human Resources Center, Faculty of Medicine, Menoufia University , Shibin el Kom, Egypt
                [6] 6Family Medicine Practitioner, DOC24 Family Practice Clinic , Ghaziabad, India
                [7] 7Ghana College of Physicians and Surgeons , Accra, Ghana
                [8] 8Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University , Durham, NC, United States
                [9] 9Planning and Quality Management Unit, Base Hospital , Panadura, Sri Lanka
                [10] 10Center for Rural Health Studies, Memorial University of Newfoundland , St. John's, NL, Canada
                [11] 11College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University , Adelaide, SA, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Sarah Larkins, James Cook University, Australia

                Reviewed by: Torres Woolley, James Cook University, Australia; Harm Van Marwijk, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, United Kingdom

                *Correspondence: Belinda O'Sullivan belinda.osullivan@ 123456uq.edu.au

                This article was submitted to Family Medicine and Primary Care, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine

                Article
                10.3389/fmed.2020.594728
                7729061
                33330559
                04a9d84d-356f-4493-a3af-f22b9eba23bd
                Copyright © 2020 O'Sullivan, Chater, Bingham, Wynn-Jones, Couper, Hegazy, Kumar, Lawson, Martinez-Bianchi, Randenikumara, Rourke, Strasser and Worley.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 14 August 2020
                : 30 October 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 132, Pages: 14, Words: 11983
                Funding
                Funded by: World Health Organization 10.13039/100004423
                Categories
                Medicine
                Brief Research Report

                rural workforce,rural health workers,training,education,professional support,implement,lmics,guide

                Comments

                Comment on this article