2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Estimation of Uncertainty in the Average Rate of Earthquakes Exceeding a Magnitude Threshold

      , , ,
      Seismological Research Letters
      Seismological Society of America (SSA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We propose a method to estimate the uncertainty of the average rate of earthquakes exceeding a magnitude threshold in a future period of given length based on observed variability of the earthquake process in an existing catalog. We estimate the ratio R of the variability to that of a stationary Poisson process. R is estimated from subsets of the catalog over a wide range of timescales. The method combines the epistemic uncertainty in estimating the rate from the catalog and the aleatory variability of the rate in future time periods. If R is stable over many timescales, there is a solid basis for estimating the uncertainty of earthquake rate estimates. In the 2022 revision of the New Zealand National Seismic Hazard Model (NZ NSHM), estimation of the total shallow earthquake rate over the next 100 yr and its uncertainty is an important element. Using a 70 yr New Zealand catalog with hypocentral depths ≤40 km and standardized magnitudes M ≥ 4.95, we find stable estimates of R for timescales from 3 days to 2.4 yr. This gives a standard error of 0.95 on the estimated annual rate of M ≥ 4.95, in the next 100 yr. R becomes unstable and has poor precision for longer subperiods. We investigate potential causes using synthetic catalogs with known inhomogeneities. Analysis of International Seismological Centre-Global Earthquake Model (ISC-GEM) catalog, to investigate the effect of higher magnitude thresholds, shows that R is lower for M ≥ 6.95 than for M ≥ 5.45. The ISC-GEM catalog restricted to New Zealand gives comparable stable estimates of R to the NZ NSHM 2022 catalog for M ≥ 5.45 and lower estimates than the NZ NSHM 2022 catalog for M ≥ 4.95. We also verify that magnitude standardization of the New Zealand GeoNet catalog has reduced the uncertainty of rate estimates by decreasing R throughout the entire range of timescales.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Frequency of earthquakes in California*

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Engineering seismic risk analysis

            C. Cornell (1968)
            This paper introduces a method for the evaluation of the seismic risk at the site of an engineering project. The results are in terms of a ground motion parameter (such as peak acceleration) versus average return period. The method incorporates the influence of all potential sources of earthquakes and the average activity rates assigned to them. Arbitrary geographical relationships between the site and potential point, line, or areal sources can be modeled with computational ease. In the range of interest, the derived distributions of maximum annual ground motions are in the form of Type I or Type II extreme value distributions, if the more commonly assumed magnitude distribution and attenuation laws are used.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              A Software Package to Analyze Seismicity: ZMAP

              S. Wiemer (2001)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Seismological Research Letters
                Seismological Society of America (SSA)
                0895-0695
                1938-2057
                November 30 2023
                November 30 2023
                Article
                10.1785/0220230242
                06f7bce5-77f4-485e-a87b-f4299b04ceb7
                © 2023
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article